• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Federal Gay Marriage Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional

Re: Federal Gay Marriage Ban is Ruled Unconstitutional

I read the bolded part and was really excited for someone to tell how gay marriage will cause harm.
Then, I notice, a distinct lack of explaining what that harm is. You are arguing: "Gay marriage causes harm because you can't predict the harm it will cause."

That's not a "successful" argument. That's not even an argument. Also, your "very conservative" tag isn't sufficient. We need a tag for "Would prefer to reinstate segregation."

Be honest... you are only arguing because of the "very conservative" tag in the first place.

Why are you always bringing up someone's political lean as a weapon against them in a debate, as a means to dismiss everything they say.
 
Re: Federal Gay Marriage Ban is Ruled Unconstitutional

Be honest... you are only arguing because of the "very conservative" tag in the first place.

Why are you always bringing up someone's political lean as a weapon against them in a debate, as a means to dismiss everything they say.

What do you mean, my centrist friend?
 
Thanks! As I stated in one post to CC, I am never deliberately dishonest in anything I post.

Tim-

I give you credit for admitting you were wrong. I will say, however, that I pointed out the error in your "endorsement" position, pages ago. I took a different route, identifying how it was an inaccurate usage in context. I did not explain it in as much detail as Tucker did, but the conclusion was the same.

Good job in re-looking at your position.
 
Back
Top Bottom