You think that parents who want to protect their kids from vile porn should have their kids taken away? Or that parents should watch their kids' activities every second of every day? Hey, I've got an idea. How about we lock up all the sicko perverts on the Internet and throw away the key? Problem solved.
My kids' right not to be exposed to sick porn trumps so-called "free speech for furries."
Here's how your kids can not be exposed to "sick porn".
1. You teach them not to look at sick porn.
2. They don't google for sick porn.
3. They enter in sick porn urls
4. They don't visit sites that would link to or pop up sick porn
5. They don't play games or get involved in activites rated higher than their age appropriate range
6. You use the child safety features in your OS
7. You use the child safety features in your browser
8. You use the child safety features in your security programs
9. You buy a program dedicated to child safety features.
10. You make rules that they can't use the computer alone.
Oh look, a HUGE amount of ways for you to keep your kids safe from "Sick Porn" that DOESN'T infringe upon other peoples rights and simply requires YOU to actually do this amazing thing called PARENTING.
Guess what, if you fail at taking advantage of multiple avenues of protection or fail to instill your kids with the proper attitude towards those things those are
your fault not everyone elses. If your child decides to bypass security, ignore your rules, or reject your morality that is
your problem not everyone elses.
Until it is impossible to visit any sight on the internet without seeing porn and that there is no ability to put child locks on software your argument is null because YOUR desire to be lazy or a crappy parent doesn't give you the right to infringe upon others freedoms, as disgusting or vile as they may be.
Could after ALL of that they still MAYBE get exposed to it? Sure. Your child could get hit by a car despite all the safety features and laws we have in place, should we remove cars? You could have your music playing inside a bulding with good insulation and without it being obscenely loud and there's still ways your child could potentially here curse words from it, should we ban music? Children at school could potentially tell a racist joke around your kids exposing them to it, should we ban children from speaking outside of class?
No, your right to wrap your child in bubble wrap ends when you expect other peoples freedoms to be infringed upon it. Obscinity laws are based in part off of reasonability. Its reasonable not to expect Yahoo News! to have explicite uncensored pictures of two people eating another's dead body. Its reasonable to not expect the encyclopedia britanica to have a full length triple penetration porn. It is however completely UNREASONABLE to expect however that the ENTIRE internet is free and clear of ANYTHING that could possibly offend your precious little snow flake.