And that last quote of course completely fabricated by you to paint your opponents with a position they never took. Its the same old song with you.
No, it's an accurate characterization of the kind of belligerent nationalism/chauvinism I see in this thread. If you don't like that, you should talk to your fellow nationalists.
There are more accurate 's' words that could be used for description here, actually.
Of course it offends us because you once again take your own personal opnion and paint the entire country with the same brush.
There's no such thing as an independent entity called "the country." The reference to the actions of "the country" is usually reference to the actions of the executive branch of the federal government, as I said.
BTW, we have only one US government.
There are various municipal, regional, and state governments and branches within them that are frequently at odds with each other and the power of the federal government. But my reference was to the people within administrations, who move in and out.
And yes many of us do know people within the intelligence community and the military so your comments dismissing the government as a who for those who love and have had loved ones die to defend it is incredibly offensive.
Everyone knows "people" that are intelligence or military personnel. Are you personally a top-level administrator that manages intelligence and military operations? Do you work in the upper echelons of the DoD? Are you stationed at the Pentagon? If you are none of those things, you have no reason to claim that you have possession of actions and campaigns ordered by those people.
Which is why you hate it so much. You've proven time and time again by your own statements that you have no respect for US law and want to use your own personal morality to judge law because in your mind the ethnicity of a person determines their "right" to land within the US.
That is an outdated and racist approach and those of us who believe the law was written for all races to follow equally will not allow you to distrort the facts based on personal morality.
My statements are intended as reciprocal, as mirrors of your own statements, to give you a taste of your own medicine and show you the consequences of the consistent application of your ideas. If you don't like the fact that consistent application of principles against immoral/illegal immigration means that Europeans should not have landed and pillaged the Western Hemisphere, you should adopt a less belligerent stance.
Indian Reservations, lands of wasted chances and ruined futures.
Right, just like the black welfare queens in Harlem, right? Poor because of their lack of hard work and self-discipline, and immoral to ask others for handouts because of their own laziness? Responsible for their own conditions?
Am I right in guessing you had a non-infantry, or more precisely, a non-combat MOS? It's usually POGs that feel that they have to compensate for something.