- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I admit mistakes all the time. I also have teh fortitude to actually apologize for making them, especialy if they involve an accusation.
False. My initial post was:
As you can see, the argument involved them being on the Mexican side of the border from the very start. I don't consider rocks thrown at a distance of greater than 20 feet to be a legitimate weapon to warrant lethal force. But I do allow for the caveat that Lethal force is warranted if the perosn is on the US side of the border, due to the fact that this is well-within the Border Guards jurisdiction.
The clarification about being able to shoot over the border came here (which is the third of fourth post by me in that thread):
Clearly I was never arguing anything but what I have said I was arguing the whole time. Nothing has changed in my stance.
As you can see, the only person lying is you. You are lying about understanding my argument, and you are lying in how you are portraying that argument. Nothing I have said has been proven wrong.
Me admitting errror just last week:
When someone actually proves me wrong, I am totally willing to admit error. I would even be willing to wager that I have done this far mroe often than you have.
My contention is that your admission of error was merely a prevetantaive measure to keep me form pointing out the error, which you could do nothing to dodge. You still haven't admitted the error that exists in the attacks on my credibility. That can only be admitted through an apology directly tro me for your unfounded accusations.
By teh way, on the "character" accusation, allow me to add into evidence an apology that I have offered to others due to an error made by me:
As I thought about my error in that thread, it occured to me that it might have caused offense to otehrs. I added the apology as an additional aspect due to the fact that I felt guilty over the offense that my error may have caused. It may not have been absolutey necessary in that case, for I made no accusations, but I offered it anyway because I felt it was the right thing to do in that case.
What I did not do was compound the error by repeating it. i.e. Your accusations against me earlier for having "deleted" posts was as unfounded as your accusations now about my character. I do not expect you to have the character to apologize for either of these accusations, but I would be pelasently surprised if you did display that degree of character.
You are trying with the apology thing to get one or both of us into trouble, and I for one refuse to step into that trap.
You posted this big block of you responding to you.
Yes, YOU don't consider rocks to be a threat. Law Enforcement does.
YOU don't think they should be allowed to shoot into Mexico. Law Enforcement CAN.
You, spent a lot of time trying to ignore the facts of the case to justify your errant opinion. Is anyone aside you buying this?
I'm thinking no, no they are not. You insulted everyone that doesn't agree with you as not being smart enough to "Get" your logic. Sorry, you failed to make your case about anything other then your personal, and wrong, opinion.