I can't think of a single exchange with you where you've had the last word. If I've forgotten something, post a link so that I can fix it.
LOL Just because you said the last thing by no means can be interpreted as a win. Perhaps in the 3rd grade yes but not in big people word.
What, so that you can end up running away again?
Are you denying it or not? Answer the question.
LOL, the Mexican government themselves stole the land. Why doesn't this ever get through your head? By the way, as I've said before, I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine by saying that you should be repatriated to Europe, since that's what the consistent application of your rules demands. It's not something I personally advocate.
Another lie. Where did I ever say all Mexicans should go home? Go on, show us all where I said that.
If you are going to lie so blatantly, this isn't going to be as much fun as I hoped.
This isn't a counter-argument. Try stepping it up, tex.
Nice dodge. It doesn't get around the fact you used your own lack of morality to assume someone would act the same way you would. Pathetic.
No, I remember him saying that.
Thats another lie and I demand you produce the quote up where he said that.
Why do you continue to repeat the assertion about it being morally wrong to violate the law when I've demonstrated that the law and morality aren't always in step? Can't you engage in independent ethical analysis?
Wow your reading comprehension level is atrocious. I said you use your own view of morality to justify not following law you are personally opposed to and you did exactly that. Trying to duck that fact is really sad.
It should be easy to migrate because people should rise and fall based on their merits and willingness to work hard, rather than pre-existing factors that they had no control over.
The idioicy of that statement is staggering. If you are want to immigrate to the US the process by its very nature should be hard to encourage only the hard working and dedicated people to immigrate. Your pathetic reasoning for allowing people to enter based on assumptions that could never be proven because they are from another country where we could verify none of those characteristics takes stupidity to a whole new level.
Why do you bring up the most retarded strawmen about "evil whitey" over and over again, especially when I've said that I'm part white and probably descended from some "evil whiteys" myself? Do you feel persecuted? That's what the line on Stormfront is, and the initial motivation for white populism.
And thats why I bring it up. You post anti white images from posters, you claim the laws of the US should not be followed because they stole the land from the locals and your position and any time someone tells you the laws should be enforced you compare them to Stormfront. You are your own worst enemy amigo
All you know how to do is repeatedly contradict, but you're never quite able to debate. You've been told numerous times that the Mexican government is also descended from European colonists, so they won't be "re-taking" anything that wasn't stolen by their predecessors.
LOL The next time you show me a white mexican trying to smuggle his way in you let me know :rofl
Dishonesty is just a way of life for you isn't it?
Which is a pathetic argument You've also been told that the Indian racial identity of the majority of migrant laborers places them at odds with the white upper class, which is why they don't have an incentive to extend their authority over them. This hasn't penetrated your skull at all.
I know you love pretending you aren't anti-white but claiming the land was stolen, posting anti white pictures and comparing anyone who doesn't agree with you to white supremacist groups shows the lack of character and honesty in your arguments.
I'm bringing up Stormfront because of your shared white populism, derived from your shared axiomatic conceptual values.
Illegal Mexican killed by Border Patrol - Stormfront
Sounds exactly like something you or any of the "very conservative" authoritarians here could say.
I'm not Conway you simpleton. LOL Do you even know who you are replying to?
So your argument against me is by associating me with someone I've never even spoken with? Thats your great link?
Doesn't get any more dishonest than that.
See you can't debate and thats why you fall into these racist rants of yours. I can quote your words, your posts and your thoughts. Your best shot is associating me with people I can never even spoken with.
Its the sign of a weak debater who can't hold his ground on the facts but that shouldn't sound new to you.
I've just accurately described what's going on.
No, you've simply lied about what's going on.
It’s chauvinistic white populism that’s the basis for propaganda about a "reconquista" and authoritarian policy like police state purges of migrant laborers that have higher employment rates than the citizen population, prohibition of ethnic studies programs, removal of teachers with accents, establishment of authoritarian and inhumane camps in Arpaio’s tent cities, and the draconian restrictions on freedom of movement around our Berlin Wall of the Southwest. It’s white populism that provides the foundation for the screeching about "Islamofascism" and the environment of harassment of Arabs and non-Arabs perceived as "Middle Eastern," which is why moronic populists attacked
Sikhs after 9/11. The "divided loyalties" rhetoric was also a cause for suspicion of Jews and widespread internment of Japanese, and is generally inflamed during tumultuous periods for the WASP population, be it military conflict, economic turmoil, or the combination that they are currently experiencing.
Ignorance about the non-WASP "ethnic" population is also typically a facet. Sikhs were attacked because the white populists were too ignorant to distinguish them from Muslims. Han Chinese and other East Asians were sometimes interned with Japanese despite the fact that they despised the Japanese empire for their invasive tactics, because the white populists were too ignorant to distinguish them from Japanese. And now, the white populists think that Mexicans are a racial group, rather than a national group ruled by a white upper class, and they're too ignorant to separate the Guatemalan and Salvadoran immigrants.
This is right up your alley, tex:
The foundations for a white populist backlash (association of hostile foreign status with a certain non-white/Anglo phenotype, attacks on the ethnic population’s usage of a minority language, overwhelmingly negative characterizations), are in place. The combination of economic troubles and prior social conservatism in the state of Arizona led to greater intolerance for immigrants, in the familiar pattern of support for authoritarianism increasing in times of crisis.
You are seen for what you are.
This is what I am:
I actually think the law should apply to all races and no one is exempt. That's where we differ.
Unlike your lies about myself and dishonesty linking me to groups I never even spoke to let alone agreed with, these are your words and your posts:
All quotes by Cochise and no one else:
I’ve grown sick of hearing claims that the U.S. government simply have the absolute right to exclude Mexican illegal immigrants or the Mexican government the right to exclude Guatemalan illegal immigrants for whatever reason when all American governments are ruling over territory that was unjustly acquired.
The state’s administration simply do not have the ethical authority to declare national sovereignty over any territory in the Americas, since the territory was gained through forcible and fraudulent aggression against the indigenous residents.
A good deal of current U.S. national territory is based on injustice
I don't honor or respect some kind of uber-nationalist screaming about *his* land being invaded. It's not his. It never was.
why do you care if illegal immigrants come and "steal" from people in the U.S.? If they can take it, as they are, shouldn't it be theirs
As the evidence shows, you are the racist not me. You believe in ethnicity over law and you thrive on the dream of kicking all whites out of America claiming the land was "stolen". Its in your own words and the pictures you post. Its there for all to read for themselves unlike when you argue you can't even quote the person directly, just lie about phony associations for your "argument"
You aren't fooling anyone when your own words sink you so easily.