You keep claiming that and I keep replying to you. Funny how that works.
I can't think of a single exchange with you where you've had the last word. If I've forgotten something, post a link so that I can fix it.
No just exposing your past statements.
Go ahead and deny it. I'll quote you directly yet again.
What, so that you can end up running away again?
I'm not the one claiming the law shouldn't apply because Aztlán thinks the land was "stolen". That would be you. I actually think the law should apply to all races and no one is exempt. That's where we differ.
LOL, the Mexican government themselves stole the land. Why doesn't this ever get through your head? By the way, as I've said before, I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine by saying that you should be repatriated to Europe, since that's what the consistent application of your rules demands. It's not something I personally advocate.
Thanks for proving once again you wish to impose your own morality to accept circumventing the law.
This isn't a counter-argument. Try stepping it up, tex.
So you based your assumption he would violate the law based on your own lack of morality. Got it.
No, I remember him saying that. Why do you continue to repeat the assertion about it being morally wrong to violate the law when I've demonstrated that the law and morality aren't always in step? Can't you engage in independent ethical analysis?
Explain why should it be easy to immigrate. Go ahead. Or should it only be easy for people who had their land "stolen" by evil whitey. :roll:
It should be easy to migrate because people should rise and fall based on their merits and willingness to work hard, rather than pre-existing factors that they had no control over. Why do you bring up the most retarded strawmen about "evil whitey" over and over again, especially when I've said that I'm part white and probably descended from some "evil whiteys" myself? Do you feel persecuted? That's what the line on Stormfront
is, and the initial motivation for white populism.
And why do people like you find themselves on the same side as Aztlán and La Reconquista?
Mexican aliens seek to retake 'stolen' land - Washington Times
:lol:
All you know how to do is repeatedly contradict, but you're never quite able to debate. You've been told numerous times that the Mexican government is also descended from European colonists, so they won't be "re-taking" anything that wasn't stolen by their predecessors. You've also been told that the Indian racial identity of the majority of migrant laborers places them at odds with the white upper class, which is why they don't have an incentive to extend their authority over them. This hasn't penetrated your skull at all.
I love it how you keep bringing up Stormfront when I've said repeatedly I'm not against legal immigration just illegal.
I'm bringing up Stormfront because of your shared white populism, derived from your shared axiomatic conceptual values.
Illegal Mexican killed by Border Patrol - Stormfront
President Felipe Calderon said Tuesday that his goverment "will use all resources available to protect the rights of Mexican migrants.
This statement needs to be fixed;
President Felipe Calderon said Tuesday that his goverment "will use all resources available to protect the rights of Mexican illegal migrants.
Doesn't sound quiet as politically useful now, does it?
Sounds exactly like something you or any of the "very conservative" authoritarians here could say.
Once again your dishonesty rears its ugly head.
I've just accurately described what's going on. It’s chauvinistic white populism that’s the basis for propaganda about a "reconquista" and authoritarian policy like police state purges of migrant laborers that have higher employment rates than the citizen population, prohibition of ethnic studies programs, removal of teachers with accents, establishment of authoritarian and inhumane camps in Arpaio’s tent cities, and the draconian restrictions on freedom of movement around our Berlin Wall of the Southwest. It’s white populism that provides the foundation for the screeching about "Islamofascism" and the environment of harassment of Arabs and non-Arabs perceived as "Middle Eastern," which is why moronic populists attacked
Sikhs after 9/11. The "divided loyalties" rhetoric was also a cause for suspicion of Jews and widespread internment of Japanese, and is generally inflamed during tumultuous periods for the WASP population, be it military conflict, economic turmoil, or the combination that they are currently experiencing.
Ignorance about the non-WASP "ethnic" population is also typically a facet. Sikhs were attacked because the white populists were too ignorant to distinguish them from Muslims. Han Chinese and other East Asians were sometimes interned with Japanese despite the fact that they despised the Japanese empire for their invasive tactics, because the white populists were too ignorant to distinguish them from Japanese. And now, the white populists think that Mexicans are a racial group, rather than a national group ruled by a white upper class, and they're too ignorant to separate the Guatemalan and Salvadoran immigrants.
This is right up your alley, tex:
The foundations for a white populist backlash (association of hostile foreign status with a certain non-white/Anglo phenotype, attacks on the ethnic population’s usage of a minority language, overwhelmingly negative characterizations), are in place. The combination of economic troubles and prior social conservatism in the state of Arizona led to greater intolerance for immigrants, in the familiar pattern of support for authoritarianism increasing in times of crisis.
You are seen for what you are.
