- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Check the facts
126 injured on the police/firefighters side, 2 guys killed by rioters
These are casualties.
j-mac
Check the facts
126 injured on the police/firefighters side, 2 guys killed by rioters
So as usual those who dare to point out that Israel does not care about international law are "anti-Israeli". And in this case it's the entire world. Gosh!
thanksYeah you are right sorry if my post came off like that.. I have a bad habbit of phailing to get ideas from me head onto paper/forums D:
What I ment is that Europe has no expirance with whats happening in Israel right now, ( all the rest was me being an idiot i appoligize)
they never had to deal with these kinds of events, and Israel is the only nation on earth to have this expirance with it.
I propose if any other europian nations were to be in Israel's shoes they would also be like that, the world just sees us as we are cause we are diff, cause we are the only ones in this situation
^
These are casualties.
j-mac
:lol:What Apocalypse does not realize is that everyone quickly condemned this guy not too long ago:
:lol:
Please point out one similatry between Israel and NK thats facts not assumptions or personal views ^^
Both are increasingly isolated on the international scene?
So as usual those who dare to point out that Israel does not care about international law are "anti-Israeli". And in this case it's the entire world. Gosh!
What Apocalypse does not realize is that everyone quickly condemned this guy not too long ago:
Those who tell soldiers not to fire back when they are being shot at are not only anti-Israeli, but possess an inhuman hatred towards the Jewish state.
Those who condemn Israel before even checking the facts are clearly and absolutely motivated by a political agenda.
Oh and did you understand the calimero stuff?
Would you like to explain?
# The word "Calimero" passed into Portuguese, French and Slovene language usage to denote, "someone that is always complaining" or considers himself a victim. It is still occasionally heard and, as of 2009, remains widely understood [1]
# In the Netherlands and Belgium, Calimero complex, is used to denote someone who thinks the world is against him/her
:lol:
Not really relevant but funny as hell
I believed it was international but then I checked on wiki:
Calimero - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You know the famous line, "Just because you're a paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you"?
no one was killed on the rioter side, that was the point
cas·u·al·ty [kazh-oo-uhl-tee] Show IPA
–noun, plural -ties.
1.
Military .
a.
a member of the armed forces lost to service through death, wounds, sickness, capture, or because his or her whereabouts or condition cannot be determined.
b.
casualties, loss in numerical strength through any cause, as death, wounds, sickness, capture, or desertion.
2.
one who is injured or killed in an accident: There were no casualties in the traffic accident.
3.
any person, group, thing, etc., that is harmed or destroyed as a result of some act or event: Their house was a casualty of the fire.
4.
a serious accident, esp. one involving bodily injury or death.
Casualty | Define Casualty at Dictionary.com
That doesn't mean they're after you neither
/checkmate :2razz:
OOOOOOOOH! That the point? Well, I should then bone up on mind reading skills, because you said "NO CASUALTIES"
Pay attention to what I highlighted here. Your take on things is interesting to say the least bub. I guess you have the right to reinvent words eh?
j-mac
You're arguing semantics but that does not change my point at all: my argument was that 126 French policemen were wounded (= these were very violent riots) and that they remained calm enough so that they did not kill anyone among the rioters.
Look bub, words mean things. When you start twisting them to suit your argument, then not only do you take your credibility and toss it out the window, but you cheapen the debate.
Now, you can say semantics all you want as a deflection to your being absolutely wrong, but those of us paying attention see it clearly.
j-mac
Seeing you post from South Carolina, I assume your first language is English. That's not my case, sometimes I don't use the exact words but I can assure you that I refered to "dead people on the rioters side", as any reasonable person would assume while reading my posts.
That being said, I still fail to see how this invalidates my argument: "126 French policemen were wounded (= these were very violent riots) and that they remained calm enough so that they did not kill anyone among the rioters."
That being said, I still fail to see how this invalidates my argument: "126 French policemen were wounded (= these were very violent riots) and that they remained calm enough so that they did not kill anyone among the rioters.". Now when you compare with the respective casualty rate on the humanitarian ship, you can only deduct that the IDF has more than probably used a disproprtionate level of violence.
You're right, because he was condemned more. Calls for sanctions have already been heared. Where are the calls for sanctions on Israel?1) This guy was not condemned the same level Israel was.
There was no UN general assembly resolution made against him.
No evidence of any wrong-doing? I suggest going back a page or two and reread the posts regarding the legal opinions of the event. Stating there was no Israeli wrong doing is merely your opinion.2) The facts seem to be against this guy, and in this case no evidence for an Israeli wrong-doing was presented so far, and the contrary is true.
If Israel had sunk which country's warship? It would be nuked by who? I don't really care for speculation based rhetoric.And by the way if Israel would have done what he did it would already be nuked.