- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,416
- Reaction score
- 35,258
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Oh, and since its talked about in another thread I won't go into it in a long way here.
I agree and disagree with Paul.
I agree with him that for the most part those laws are no longer needed and do more damage to the philosophy and theory of personal property rights than they do good in regards to racism in todays society.
I disagree with him because I do think, at the time, it was a necessary evil. However, I do not know if I'd disagree with his seeming belief that he wouldn't have voted for it then, in large part because I would figure it'd do as it is now, never seem to go away even after its no longer really useful and is just more bad than good.
I agree and disagree with Paul.
I agree with him that for the most part those laws are no longer needed and do more damage to the philosophy and theory of personal property rights than they do good in regards to racism in todays society.
I disagree with him because I do think, at the time, it was a necessary evil. However, I do not know if I'd disagree with his seeming belief that he wouldn't have voted for it then, in large part because I would figure it'd do as it is now, never seem to go away even after its no longer really useful and is just more bad than good.