• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court: Sex offenders can be held indefinitely

I agree with you, but the problem I have is that we can make the penalty under the law to be life in prison without parole. I think that is a more sensible way to handle it. Change it at the sentencing level, not just say that if the government finds they may be a threat after they have served their sentence, we can hold them. That concept scares me.

I think I understand your point, and agree; but digsbe is talking about repeat offenders. There may be situations where the court determines that at the end of a sentence, an offender has not changed, and therefore would have to commit another offense (due to the requirement to first free the offender) before the court could remedy the situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom