- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 10,320
- Reaction score
- 2,116
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Why can't it be modified?
It CAN be modified.... through the proper amendment process ... NOT through judicial activism...
Why can't it be modified?
What's not to understand? Obama needs friends in high places to forward, and sustain his wickedly dishonest progressive agenda.
Have you noticed...out of the box...the left is "complaining" that she's too "centrists". A new strategy I'm detetecting here...but, just the same old blatant lies, and intellectual dishonesty to insure "social justice" for all on the backs of the few.
Never, ever trust a leftist...they're morally bankrupt, and will look you in the eye as they lie about and obfuscate their "progressive" (communist) plans for America.
Yes, he could have picked worse, but he could have picked far better.
Apparently not. It might help some of your arguments.Did any of you happen to catch Charlie Rose last night? They had a discussion on her.
Hopefully.
An interesting argument from a Moderate attorney I know who is currently employed in the Obama DOJ
he noted that he worries about Justices such as (ex justice) Souter, Sotomayor and perhaps now Kagan who are unmarried and have no children because they don't have near as much stake in the future as those with children.
Thought I don't know if I entirely agree with this it is a point worth considering.
"If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the US population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats," Buchanan wrote in a column for WorldNetDaily on Friday. "Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity?"
Buchanan: With Kagan, too many Jews on Supreme Court bench | Raw Story"So why hasn’t Buchanan been complaining about the severe overrepresentation of Episcopalians and Presbyterians on the bench?" Frisch asks. "They account for 50 percent of all Justices and only 4.5 percent of the U.S. population. Certainly that would enrage someone like Buchanan, right?"
pat buKKKanan did it again:
Buchanan: With Kagan, too many Jews on Supreme Court bench | Raw Story
the reich wingers are looking for anything to use against Obama's appointee, no matter how bigoted it might make them appear
My sense of humor suffers everytime I write a quarterly check to the feds to feed and house your ilk.
Not to mention to pay for Interstate Highways, the Air traffic control system, to build airports, to forecast the weather, to research and develop very large and fast jet fighters and bombers, to research and develop very powerful weapons and defense systems, pay for our adventures in the middle east, pay for an SEC to somewhat temper fraud in the markets, pay for our national parks and national forests, pay for the clean-up of the gulf as we know BP/Trans-Ocean and Halliburton will shrug that "personal responsibility", pay for the FBI, the CIA and the NSA, pay for our local police and firefighters, pay for the space shuttle, pay for the NIH including the Center for Disease Control and pay so we don't have mass homelessness amongst those over 65 (aka social security and medicare).
So, because some spending is warranted, heck, even mandated by the Constitution in the case of roads, that means that we should just shut up and not question any of it?
Yeah ok...... :roll:
j-mac
pat buKKKanan did it again:
Buchanan: With Kagan, too many Jews on Supreme Court bench | Raw Story
the reich wingers are looking for anything to use against Obama's appointee, no matter how bigoted it might make them appear