• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

APNewsBreak: Bubble of methane triggered rig blast

Gina

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
44,019
Reaction score
29,303
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO – The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation.

As has been posted earlier on this subject, cement placed at the bottom of the well meant to act as a seal seems to be the culprit.

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor. A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.

There are safe guards and from interviews of the workers on the rig, the safeguards did not work.

Investigators looking into the cause of the explosion have been focusing on the so-called blowout preventer. Federal regulators told The Associated Press Friday that they are going to examine whether these last-resort cutoff valves on offshore oil wells are reliable.

Blowouts are infrequent, because well holes are blocked by piping and pumped-in materials like synthetic mud, cement and even sea water. The pipes are plugged with cement, so fluid and gas can't typically push up inside the pipes.

Instead, a typical blowout surges up a channel around the piping. The narrow space between the well walls and the piping is usually filled with cement, so there is no pathway for a blowout. But if the cement or broken piping leaves enough space, a surge can rise to the surface.

There, at the wellhead of exploratory wells, sits the massive steel contraption known as a blowout preventer. It can snuff a blowout by squeezing rubber seals tightly around the pipes with up to 1 million pounds of force. If the seals fail, the blowout preventer deploys a last line of defense: a set of rams that can slice right through the pipes and cap the blowout.

Deepwater Horizon was also equipped with an automated backup system called a Deadman. It should have activated the blowout preventer even if workers could not.

Based on the interviews with rig workers, none of those safeguards worked.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gulf_oil_spill
 
Last edited:
As has been posted earlier on this subject, cement placed at the bottom of the well meant to act as a seal seems to be the culprit.

Well, here we go. Now we have people who don't know jack **** about how an oil well works acting like they know how an oil well works. Hint #1, they don't use cement as a plug.

This is a classic case of some reporter taking half-assed information and adding their own creative license to it. I was waiting for this.
 
Well, here we go. Now we have people who don't know jack **** about how an oil well works acting like they know how an oil well works. Hint #1, they don't use cement as a plug.

This is a classic case of some reporter taking half-assed information and adding their own creative license to it. I was waiting for this.


Did you read the link? The reporter is quoting Robert Bea:

Portions of the interviews, two written and one taped, were described in detail to an Associated Press reporter by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He received them from industry friends seeking his expert opinion.

So:

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor. A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.

It's not the reporter's supposition, it is Bea's.
 
Did you read the link? The reporter is quoting Robert Bea:



So:



It's not the reporter's supposition, it is Bea's.


Those who can, do and those who can't, teach.

I'm not really concerned with the opinion of a school teacher, from Berkley, of all places. And, if Bea is saying that they use cement as a plug, then his credibility is shot. Either he knows dick about drilling, or the use of the word cement is being used to set it up to be Halliburton's fault, and on we go to Dick Cheney.

Let me add something that I should have clarified in my first post: could a gas pocket have been the culprit? Sure! That's how blowouts typically happen. I recall hearing the guy on Mark Levin's show saying that the rig, "took a kick". That's when the workstring--the drill pipe--penetrates a cavity and natural gas, at massive pressure tries to travel up the string. Now, taking a kick and blowing out are two different things.

The piece of information I'm waiting for, is what they were doing when the well blew out. I've heard they were drilling. I've also heard they were running casing. That's a very important tidbit that hasn't been clarified, yet.

If they were running casing, then the gas bubble theory, IMO, isn't accurate.

As far as the BOP--blow out preventer--goes, the Horizon was using what's known in the industry as a subsea tree. The tree houses the BOP stack, which is made up of the BOP(s) and the annuler.

This is a conventional BOP stack. The annuler at the top, then a double BOP, then a single BOP. The subsea tree is much more advanced than this apparatus, which has only one hydraulic power source. The subsea tree used on the Horizon--built by FMC--had three operating sources.

BOPstack1.JPG
 
Oh, the irony …

“A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts.” — Associated Press

I saw that too. A little premature?

I wonder what their reaction is since they were there to experience the danger their workers faced. Will they push for more strict safeguards?
 
Oh, the irony …

“A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts.” — Associated Press

Yeah, the Libs are all excited about this. Huh?

Now ya'll have an excuse to stop drilling and put a million people out of work.
 
I saw that too. A little premature?

I wonder what their reaction is since they were there to experience the danger their workers faced. Will they push for more strict safeguards?


You better believe they will. BP will lose billions because of this blowout. They sure as hell don't want it to happen again.
 
Well, here we go. Now we have people who don't know jack **** about how an oil well works acting like they know how an oil well works. Hint #1, they don't use cement as a plug.

This is a classic case of some reporter taking half-assed information and adding their own creative license to it. I was waiting for this.

Actually.....

I (actually, Halliburton) have plugged wells on several occassions using cement. We also used cement to secure casing. But that was 20 years ago when I worked in the oil patch. Don't know if they still use it today but I don't know why they wouldn't unless some better technology has come about.

The most common cause for blowouts, as far as I know, is because above oil formations it is quite common to find salt domes, or other formations holding gasses under high pressure. Once this formation is "punctured, so to speak, the weight of the "drilling mud" (barite or "bar" as we called it) is supposed to keep downhole pressures downhole. But when the mud comes into a void, and sucked into that void, it can all be lost in a matter of seconds. When methane, or any gas for that matter, rises it expands thus adding additional pressure, overcoming the weight of the drilling mud, this "burping" the drilling mud out of the string of pipe, thus enabling the gas to make it's way to the surface. Sort of a domino effect.

Drilling mud is constantly monitored for weight and viscosity and return. When the flapper on the return line clicks faster than the mud goes into the hole, you have a problem. It means something is pushing your mud OUT of the hole and you lose the weight holding the downhole pressures down. When you lose your mud return, it means you're losing it downhole. Not a good scenerio either.

That's when bopper's (Blow Out Preventers or BOP's) are suppose to come into play. You got blind rams and shear rams. Each have their function. They are tested frequently. At least, they supposed to be.

I worked offshore on J Storm 5 (Marine Drilling) when the gas count registered in the return mud at over 3000 units. We had stand by boats. Daily drills. Used only brass sledgehammers (brass doesn't spark) and absolutely no smoking was allowed.

It's no place for a screw up. that's for sure.
 
Last edited:
Those who can, do and those who can't, teach.

I'm not really concerned with the opinion of a school teacher, from Berkley, of all places. And, if Bea is saying that they use cement as a plug, then his credibility is shot. Either he knows dick about drilling, or the use of the word cement is being used to set it up to be Halliburton's fault, and on we go to Dick Cheney.

Let me add something that I should have clarified in my first post: could a gas pocket have been the culprit? Sure! That's how blowouts typically happen. I recall hearing the guy on Mark Levin's show saying that the rig, "took a kick". That's when the workstring--the drill pipe--penetrates a cavity and natural gas, at massive pressure tries to travel up the string. Now, taking a kick and blowing out are two different things.

The piece of information I'm waiting for, is what they were doing when the well blew out. I've heard they were drilling. I've also heard they were running casing. That's a very important tidbit that hasn't been clarified, yet.

If they were running casing, then the gas bubble theory, IMO, isn't accurate.

As far as the BOP--blow out preventer--goes, the Horizon was using what's known in the industry as a subsea tree. The tree houses the BOP stack, which is made up of the BOP(s) and the annuler.

This is a conventional BOP stack. The annuler at the top, then a double BOP, then a single BOP. The subsea tree is much more advanced than this apparatus, which has only one hydraulic power source. The subsea tree used on the Horizon--built by FMC--had three operating sources.

BOPstack1.JPG

Oh for God's sake. He worked for BP. He's an engineer for oil safety.

Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s.

Further, he also worked for Shell and on oil rigs. So he did, but is now 73 and can't.

"What we had learned when I worked as a drill rig laborer was swoosh, boom, run," Bea said. "The swoosh is the gas, boom is the explosion and run is what you better be doing."

The gas flooded into an adjoining room with exposed ignition sources, he said.

"That's where the first explosion happened," said Bea, who worked for Shell Oil in the 1960s during the last big northern Gulf of Mexico oil well blowout. "The mud room was next to the quarters where the party was. Then there was a series of explosions that subsequently ignited the oil that was coming from below."

Disparage him all you want, I really don't have a dog in the fight, but he has credentials and his opinion was sought as an expert.



Also, there isn't a word about Halliburton in the entire article
 
Actually.....

I (actually, Halliburton) have plugged wells on several occassions using cement. We also used cement to secure casing. But that was 20 years ago when I worked in the oil patch. Don't know if they still use it today but I don't know why they wouldn't unless some better technology has come about.

The most common cause for blowouts, as far as I know, is because above oil formations it is quite common to find salt domes, or other formations holding gasses under high pressure. Once this formation is "punctured, so to speak, the weight of the "drilling mud" (barite or "bar" as we called it) is supposed to keep downhole pressures downhole. But when the mud comes into a void, and sucked into that void, it can all be lost in a matter of seconds. When methane, or any gas for that matter, rises it expands thus adding additional pressure, overcoming the weight of the drilling mud, this "burping" the drilling mud out of the string of pipe, thus enabling the gas to make it's way to the surface. Sort of a domino effect.

Drilling mud is constantly monitored for weight and viscosity and return. When the flapper on the return line clicks faster than the mud goes into the hole, you have a problem. It means something is pushing your mud OUT of the hole and you lose the weight holding the downhole pressures down. When you lose your mud return, it means you're losing it downhole. Not a good scenerio either.

That's when bopper's (Blow Out Preventers or BOP's) are suppose to come into play. You got blind rams and shear rams. Each have their function. They are tested frequently. At least, they supposed to be.

I worked offshore on J Storm 5 (Marine Drilling) when the gas count registered in the return mud at over 3000 units. We had stand by boats. Daily drills. Used only brass sledgehammers (brass doesn't spark) and absolutely no smoking was allowed.

It's no place for a screw up. that's for sure.


Yes, cement is used to set casing. Yes, cement is used to P&A--plug an abandon--a well. But, you know as well as I do that cement isn't used as a plug while drilling operations are going on.

Last I heard, the BOP stack is tested everytime the rig trips pipe--or, as you say, supposed to be.
 
Oh for God's sake. He worked for BP. He's an engineer for oil safety.



Further, he also worked for Shell and on oil rigs. So he did, but is now 73 and can't.



Disparage him all you want, I really don't have a dog in the fight, but he has credentials and his opinion was sought as an expert.



Also, there isn't a word about Halliburton in the entire article

He was a pencil pusher that became a teacher. Like I said, those who can do, those who can't, teach.

Further, he also worked for Shell and on oil rigs. So he did, but is now 73 and can't.

He wasn't on this rig, so therefore it's his opinion of what might have happened. On that, he's correct. That is what might have happened.
 
Last edited:
He was a pencil pusher that became a teacher. Like I said, those who can do, those who can't, teach.



He wasn't on this rig, so therefore it's his opinion of what might have happened. On that, he's correct. That is what might have happened.



There are several applications that are loosly referred to as "plugging the well" using cement. I can't swear to it but I seem to remember using a rubber compund once or twice too.

Service hands did all that stuff. Schlumberger, Halliburton, National Well Control, etc.

I just had the pleasure of doing all the floor-hand (read: ****ty work) duties and putting up BOP's and taking them down again and again and again. Back then we used a BFH (sledge) and a hammer wrench. No impact wrenches. Hanging off a ridebelt, above the ocean, torquing up bolts as big as apples, by hand, makes one strong like ox and smart like bull. Wonder if that's why they called us roughnecks? :confused:

I have spent many years in the Gulf. It's a world away from the rest of the world.
 
There are several applications that are loosly referred to as "plugging the well" using cement. I can't swear to it but I seem to remember using a rubber compund once or twice too.

Yes, that is correct. I've seen rubber plugs used, as well. FMC is in the rubber plug business. However, the only time they, "plug", a well using cement is when they are killing the well, permanently. Or, semi-permanently, because I think they can still go back and open a well that's been P&A'ed.

Service hands did all that stuff. Schlumberger, Halliburton, National Well Control, etc.

Yessir, along with BJ Services, Franks Casing and Weatherford. I do alotta work for BJ's and Halliburton's cement crews on land rigs.

I just had the pleasure of doing all the floor-hand (read: ****ty work) duties and putting up BOP's and taking them down again and again and again. Back then we used a BFH (sledge) and a hammer wrench. No impact wrenches. Hanging off a ridebelt, above the ocean, torquing up bolts as big as apples, by hand, makes one strong like ox and smart like bull. Wonder if that's why they called us roughnecks? :confused:

Purdy much how they do it now.

I have spent many years in the Gulf. It's a world away from the rest of the world.

Where'd you leave out of? Fourchon? Venice? Cameron? Freshwater City? Intracoastal City? Morgan City? Berwick? Port Lavaca? Port O'Conner? Harbor Island? I've poured sweat in all of'em...:rofl
 
Oh come on. That's just the right wing media spin. Everyone knows this is Bush's fault.




And Haliburton
 
too bad that environmental impact study was cancelled

washingtonpost.com

mms' assessments are insulting---a large spill would bleed 1500 barrels total, deepwater disasters would never reach land, would dissipate in 10 days, would dispose "sub lethal" effects on fish...

it's not just oil, by the way, it's sleaze:

In 2008, a series of government watchdog reports implicated a dozen current and former employees of the MMS in inappropriate or unethical relationships with industry officials.

The reports described "a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity'' in the Royalty in Kind program, in which the government forgoes royalties and takes a share of the oil and gas for resale instead. From 2002 to 2006, nearly a third of the RIK staff socialized with and received gifts and gratuities from oil and gas companies.

Since spill, feds have given 27 waivers to oil companies in gulf | McClatchy
 
Oh come on. That's just the right wing media spin. Everyone knows this is Bush's fault.




And Haliburton

You jest, but I did hear a sound bite where some clown was saying that since Bush didn't make the offshore companies use accoustic shut-offs, that it was, indeed, Bush's fault.

I saw Bob Beckel on Hannity Monday night going on about how it's Halliburton's fault. Plus we have that silly thread about how it might be Halliburton's fault. I knew it would get rediculous as some point; just didn't think it would take so long...lol
 
There are several applications that are loosly referred to as "plugging the well" using cement. I can't swear to it but I seem to remember using a rubber compund once or twice too.

Yes, that is correct. I've seen rubber plugs used, as well. FMC is in the rubber plug business. However, the only time they, "plug", a well using cement is when they are killing the well, permanently. Or, semi-permanently, because I think they can still go back and open a well that's been P&A'ed.



Yessir, along with BJ Services, Franks Casing and Weatherford. I do alotta work for BJ's and Halliburton's cement crews on land rigs.



Purdy much how they do it now.



Where'd you leave out of? Fourchon? Venice? Cameron? Freshwater City? Intracoastal City? Morgan City? Berwick? Port Lavaca? Port O'Conner? Harbor Island? I've poured sweat in all of'em...:rofl

Right on brother. You ****ing rock. We WILL drill!

When I was with Marine Drilling, we flew outta the Corus Christi Area. When I was working with Penrod, I would catch the helo outta, I wanna say, Leevilles, Leesville, LA??? We could see Venice lights at night. It was at the Chevron yards, I believe.

When I was doing completions, (setting slips, inspecting well-head installations, testing annulus's (sp???) for National Well Control, I would catch outta wherever the hell they sent me. I've done Cameron, Intracostal City, Morgan City and Port Lavaca for sure. Port O'Conner rings a bell but Harbor Island and Berwick does not. But maybe... you never know. That was 2 decades ago.

I also worked a lotta land rigs in the Austin Chalk near Giddings, La Grange, (they gotta lotta nice girls..sahh..) Texas area. Also worked on some doubles and triples, land rigs drilling and doing some workover throughout Texas. Also dod a butt-load of completions on land rigs for NWC in the chalk.

I got scars bro. By now, you probably know that to be true having worked the patch yourself.

Keep turnin' to the right.

Captain America
 
Last edited:
Right on brother. You ****ing rock. We WILL drill!

When I was with Marine Drilling, we flew outta the Corus Christi Area. When I was working with Penrod, I would catch the helo outta, I wanna say, Leevilles, Leesville, LA??? We could see Venice lights at night. It was at the Chevron yards, I believe.

When I was doing completions, (setting slips, inspecting well-head installations, testing annulus's (sp???) for National Well Control, I would catch outta wherever the hell they sent me. I've done Cameron, Intracostal City, Morgan City and Port Lavaca for sure. Port O'Conner rings a bell but Harbor Island and Berwick does not. But maybe... you never know. That was 2 decades ago.

I also worked a lotta land rigs in the Austin Chalk near Giddings, La Grange, (they gotta lotta nice girls..sahh..) Texas area. Also worked on some doubles and triples, land rigs drilling and doing some workover throughout Texas. Also dod a butt-load of completions on land rigs for NWC in the chalk.

I got scars bro. By now, you probably know that to be true having worked the patch yourself.

Keep turnin' to the right.

Captain America

Leeville, is where the Chevron dock is. Leesville is where Fort Polk is at.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom