• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Muslim Hate Group Gives Death-threat to South Park

1) Your logic is entirely based on the well-known fallacy argument from ignorance.

2) The second half is a false dichotomy you've created.

You might want to rethink your position, it's extraordinarily weak.

Yeah, sure. You got schooled, dude. And you know it, which is why you had no real response. How about this: Prove pink snorklewackers do not exist. They do, you know. And THEY are the real gods. And they are pissed and you are screwed. They told me so. And you know who agrees? Santa and pink unicorns and wizards and, yes, Allah.
 
He doesn't have to prove anything. How do you prove or disprove a negative concept.

I tell you what, since you obvious believe that Allah does exist or is likely to exist, why don't you do all of your fellow posters a favour by pointing to evidence that supports your position?

That way we can get around the fallacy of ignorance, by adducing some positive evidence.

Kindly appreciated. :)

He doesn't get it. They make some unsupported claim and then you say "what?" They then ask you to prove their silly fairy tale is wrong. As if you need to prove that the infinite number of things that do not exist don't. How stupid is that? But they will agree flying pink unicorns don't exist. Or bigfoot. Based, of course, on the same logic I'm using to say Allah is a figment of their collective imaginations. Human are strange indeed.
 
I'm not sure if child molestation is an applicable when people were getting married when they were twelve, there was little to no public education or decent living standards, and when you were lucky to live to forty. 'Child molestation' as an ethical and legal concept is an invention of modern times, pertaining to a certain dysfunctional psychological profile who are unable to act according to established cultural mores.

And when did murder change?
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Boom! <---- Revolution Islams site currently

That....is....AWESOME
 
Haha their site got exploited. Serves them right for making death threats against two of the coolest guys in America.
 
HUH?????
what does partisan politics have to do with a racial hate-group giving death "warnings" to innocent artists expressing their creativity!?!?!?!?

Looks like certain hate group Muslims don't believe in freedom of speech and are determined to use scare tactics to squelch that freedom.
 
I wish Two and a Half Men would make an anti-Islam comment. That show needs to be blown up.

A comment was made about an Arab shiek having several young girls as wives...
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Boom! <---- Revolution Islams site currently

That....is....AWESOME
Awesome! AMERICA, **** YEAH!!
 
And when did murder change?

Depends on the cultural context and time.

In medieval Iceland, going up to a person and putting an axe in his head because he originated insulting poetry about you could amount to nothing or a few years exile.

Not all civilizations are "bothered" by murder.
 
Last edited:
No. Episode 20 and 201.

Oh...no haven't seen them, can't find the streams...but bleeping "Mohammad" and the resulting "this is what I learned today" moment at the end of the episode sound like typical South Park stunts.
 
Oh...no haven't seen them, can't find the streams...but bleeping "Mohammad" and the resulting "this is what I learned today" moment at the end of the episode sound like typical South Park stunts.

:doh:doh:doh:doh

Checked the news lately, Jerry?
 
you cant judge satire by the opinions of the most stupid people who see it.
 
Give props where props is due.

1271986524457.jpg
 
He doesn't have to prove anything. How do you prove or disprove a negative concept.

I tell you what, since you obvious believe that Allah does exist or is likely to exist, why don't you do all of your fellow posters a favour by pointing to evidence that supports your position?

That way we can get around the fallacy of ignorance, by adducing some positive evidence.

Kindly appreciated. :)

Sure he does. He claims to know for certain something. That's quite a claim, and I want to see how he can make the claim.

Obviously I don't expect him to be able to do so, he cannot prove a negative.
 
Yeah, sure. You got schooled, dude. And you know it, which is why you had no real response. How about this: Prove pink snorklewackers do not exist. They do, you know. And THEY are the real gods. And they are pissed and you are screwed. They told me so. And you know who agrees? Santa and pink unicorns and wizards and, yes, Allah.

Why would I need to prove they don't exist? I'm not the one claiming to know they don't exist.

I gave you a real response. Your entire argument is nothing. Simple as that. so instead you try to play some completely unrelated card. Read again: your logic is completely fallacious. Means I don't have to say anything more, because you have nothing.
 
I guess that's why I stick to the philosophy section. People outside it are incapable of serious logical discussion, and rely on the emotional support of others to make an argument rather than sound reason.

Take a Logic 101 class or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom