- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,080
- Reaction score
- 3,918
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I never claimed any of those things are meals, but you knew that already. A combination of three pieces of fruit and a handful of nuts makes a pretty decent lunch.
For who? Are you claiming that everyone has the same caloric requirements as you? You're on a diet, after all.
No. What does that have to do with anything?
No. Again, what does that have to do with anything?
It has everything to do with this thread. You are not in the socioeconomic bracket that I'm even talking about, so of course you can talk like it's so easy to make healthy changes.
No. Good choices like staying in school and studying a marketable skill make a huge difference. But again, that has little to do with anything in relation to this thread.
And if you're a single parent, how do you make that happen? You're a conservative and I know you tend to be against entitlement programs. So tell me, how does a single parent with a low income job further their education and also spend money on higher quality food + spend more time on preparation of said food?
I don't think you understand the full array of reasons of why people choose to eat unhealthy, fast food in today's world. There is a positive correlation between poverty and fast food consumption. Does that matter to you?
I'm not going to apologize for looking after my own health. In fact, I am advocating that everyone do the same.
Straw man. I wasn't attacking you for looking after yourself. I was pointing out that you have fewer opportunity costs which is WHY you can spend 10 hours a week at the gym. You are not counted as being in the lower class.
No. The talk is about government involvement in issues it should not be involved in. The talk is about the government providing an unnatural advantage to the weak willed, the stupid, and the infirm by making decisions for them. The talk is about the government involving itself in business models of private corporations rather than letting the market decide what the model should be.
I don't think we can make any headway in this discussion until you are willing to expand your scope and understanding for why people consume this kind of food. You're too busy seeing it as an issue of stupidity and placing blame on the individual when it's a holistic problem. Marketing shapes those choices.
There are stupid people in every country, so why does yours have such a high obesity rate?
Not my argument.
You said your problem is the government butting its nose in where it does not belong, but you have failed to demonstrate that's what's happening here. Is part of the government's job not to reasonably ensure public health/
And as I said: if the food's got too much salt in it for you, choose a different food.
Most processed foods have too much salt in them.
Because I think we are shallowing our gene pool by removing the consequences of personal irresponsible behavior.
Oh I see. So you're in favor of allowing the obesity, heart disease, and diabetes epidemic to continue to your country's detriment?
I care about my country having a healthy population. I guess that is the difference between you and I. That pretty much ends the debate then.