• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huckabee likens gay marriage to incest, drugs, and polygamy

61 Electric Bron-Yr-Aur said:
I'm not the querulous type. Anybody who can't see who Obama really is (a radical, elitist, pompous, mendacious, stealing, Know-Nothing-In-Chief) needs to invest in some Critical Thinking For Dummies.
Click to expand...

Good luck on this forum, you'll need it. Bye.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Cut out the personal attacks
 
misterman said:
You can dislike Obama, but you can't call him dumb. Bush was dumb.
Click to expand...


Really? I call Obama a vapid empty suit. Luckily for him, the masses that kneel before him and swallow what he offers them dont care. I watch him try to string sentences together without a teleprompter and laugh my ass off. Obama failed as a college lecturer, failed as a community organizer, but hey, he is a 'clean and well spoken black person' and gives a speech that someone else has written well (as long as someone is feeding him lines. Yep...the stuff of intellectual giants.

And I'd put Bush up against...Oh...say...YOU any day...
 
misterman said:
Even if he was at the bottom of his class at Harvard Law, he was at Harvard Law. You? But hey, you're smarter than me and Obama, and you can see right through him. :lol:

No, you can't call him dumb. Not with any credibility. That's like calling him a commie or a secret Muslim - an absurd overreach that has sucked all the credibility out of his critics, like you.
Click to expand...

Why dont you pit your credentials against Bush? That should be fun...
 
VanceMack said:
Why dont you pit your credentials against Bush? That should be fun...
Click to expand...

I don't go around claiming people who are obviously smart are dumb.

You don't have to like Obama, but come on, he's not stupid.
 
VanceMack said:
Really? I call Obama a vapid empty suit. Luckily for him, the masses that kneel before him and swallow what he offers them dont care. I watch him try to string sentences together without a teleprompter and laugh my ass off.
Click to expand...

You mean like all of those he did before he was elected? :2wave:

Obama failed as a college lecturer
Click to expand...

Which is little more then conjecture on your part.

failed as a community organizer
Click to expand...

Which is little more then conjecture on your part again.

And I'd put Bush up against...Oh...say...YOU any day...
Click to expand...

I dunno. I don't know anyone here who ran a successful sports team into the ground and then had to beg daddy to get his rich Saudi investor friends to take in on the chin for him. :rofl
 
misterman said:
I don't go around claiming people who are obviously smart are dumb.

You don't have to like Obama, but come on, he's not stupid.
Click to expand...

I dont think his cred is all that different than Bush...which is why I made the post. Shockingly...you leap to criticize Bush but defend Obama...
 
VanceMack said:
I dont think his cred is all that different than Bush...which is why I made the post. Shockingly...you leap to criticize Bush but defend Obama...
Click to expand...

Oh it's different.

Bush got an MBA, Obama a JD.
Bush ran businesses, Obama worked as a lecturer and a lawyer.

If anything, Bush's failures were well known before he was elected. Obama's weren't.
 
obvious Child said:
You mean like all of those he did before he was elected? :2wave:

Which is little more then conjecture on your part.

Which is little more then conjecture on your part again.

I dunno. I don't know anyone here who ran a successful sports team into the ground and then had to beg daddy to get his rich Saudi investor friends to take in on the chin for him. :rofl
Click to expand...

Nort conjecture...fact. he got his 'job' because of politics. Read some of the interviews with his fellow educators. And have you LOOKED at his communities that he 'organized'?

And we'll put you down as another muppet that swallows what you are fed like a good little boy. Notice...I am not defending Bush...I brought him up. But when you get your degrees at Yale and Harvard, make sure we all know about it! When you successfully run for governor anywhere...give us a shout. ANd apparently as 'dumb' as we was he danced cricles around all the democrat wunderkinds for 8 years...so what does that say about THEM.

And you.
 
obvious Child said:
Oh it's different.

Bush got an MBA, Obama a JD.
Bush ran businesses, Obama worked as a lecturer and a lawyer.

If anything, Bush's failures were well known before he was elected. Obama's weren't.
Click to expand...

Wipe your chin...you dribbled a little.
 
VanceMack said:
Nort conjecture...fact. he got his 'job' because of politics. Read some of the interviews with his fellow educators. And have you LOOKED at his communities that he 'organized'?
Click to expand...

Interviews with fellow educators prove this? Quote them, with links. Are any of them in a position to know this with credibility? I seriously doubt it. They could be spewing the same conjecture you are. Pure gossip.

Get some actual evidence.

And we'll put you down as another muppet that swallows what you are fed like a good little boy.
Click to expand...

Like vague claims that fellow educators said something once?
 
obvious Child said:
If anything, Bush's failures were well known before he was elected. Obama's weren't.
Click to expand...

And yet, the American people almost elected him in 2000, and did reelect him in '04. That does kind of make you wonder, doesn't it?
 
61 Electric Bron-Yr-Aur said:
His competition was a charlatan and a doofus. Not really tough.
Click to expand...

Well, it would be nice to have a clear cut choice, instead of choosing the lesser of the evils.

Right now, it looks like we'll have a similar choice next time around, that is unless the Republicans can come up with someone better than what they have now.
 
61 Electric Bron-Yr-Aur said:
Unfortunately, it appears that way. Palin or Huckabee would be toast. The GOP's only hope is a Jindalesque figure.
Click to expand...

Yet, there must be hundreds of Americans who are rational, reasonable, and have demonstrated real leadership. Surely, someone could be recruited.

When Clinton was doing his Monica thing, I was sure we couldn't do any worse. When Bush was elected, I knew I was wrong. Obama has more going for him, but still is advocating a spending spree that we'll never be able to sustain.

It's time for a head hunter to make a search.
 
61 Electric Bron-Yr-Aur said:
Unfortunately, it appears that way. Palin or Huckabee would be toast. The GOP's only hope is a Jindalesque figure.
Click to expand...

You mean someone like Jindal except with a hope of winning? Who would that be?
 
VanceMack said:
Nort conjecture...fact. he got his 'job' because of politics. Read some of the interviews with his fellow educators. And have you LOOKED at his communities that he 'organized'?
Click to expand...

How about you support some of your claims?

And we'll put you down as another muppet that swallows what you are fed like a good little boy. Notice...I am not defending Bush...I brought him up. But when you get your degrees at Yale and Harvard, make sure we all know about it!
Click to expand...

Okay...doesn't make up for his running of the Rangers into the ground.

When you successfully run for governor anywhere...give us a shout. ANd apparently as 'dumb' as we was he danced cricles around all the democrat wunderkinds for 8 years...so what does that say about THEM.

And you.
Click to expand...

8 years? Come again? What world do you live in? Bush barely won the 2004 election with one of the smallest margins in US history against arguably one of the worst candidates the Democrats have ever fielded in their history.
 
Bush should never have won either election. It was the Supreme Court, not the American voters, who put him in office the first time. The second time (2004) the election was so influenced by outright lies that a new political term was coined: "swiftboating".
 
Dittohead not! said:
Bush should never have won either election. It was the Supreme Court, not the American voters, who put him in office the first time. The second time (2004) the election was so influenced by outright lies that a new political term was coined: "swiftboating".
Click to expand...

The first time was just a cluster ****. No way around it, so I think we have to accept that one. But nothing was more disheartening than the swiftboating. I believe it hurt veterans both in the past and in the future. I don't believe you can really care about veterans and support the swiftboaters for untruth.
 
Boo Radley said:
The first time was just a cluster ****. No way around it, so I think we have to accept that one. But nothing was more disheartening than the swiftboating. I believe it hurt veterans both in the past and in the future. I don't believe you can really care about veterans and support the swiftboaters for untruth.
Click to expand...

God Bless the Swiftboat men and the Medal of Honor winners who stood with them against that traitor John Kerry...........I believe they are one of the main reasons this aristocratic snob from the North East did not get elected......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom