- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Lets Apply your definition to the 2nd and see where the logic falls..
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
A direct ruled milita, being neccessary to the security of a free state.......
wait, even with your definition applies, it still does not change the fact that the right of the people shall not be infringed....
So any of your definitions applied, does not change the fact that the 2nd amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms...
Your point is moot.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
A direct ruled milita, being neccessary to the security of a free state.......
wait, even with your definition applies, it still does not change the fact that the right of the people shall not be infringed....
So any of your definitions applied, does not change the fact that the 2nd amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms...
Your point is moot.