• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Foes of tea party movement to infiltrate rallies

Fiddytree said:
I think that is the Coffee Party, which is truly the only group of people who could make the Tea Party movement seem like it is ready to become politically relevant.
Click to expand...

I belong to the Latte Party, a grandisimo movement that seeks to return the nation to the ideals of founding father Alexander Hamilton, in which supreme authority is permanently assigned to the banking industry.
 
So a Tea Party crasher goes to a tea party. He then stands in-between an FBI woman and a CIA man, and behind a homeland security officer.

Know your enemy like you know yourself.

Infiltration of groups is a common practice. When the gubmint announced back in 2001, that they were starting a TAPS group (if I recall correctly) to allow citizens to rat out potential terrorists, I signed up immediately. After a couple of news letters, the idea was rightfully abandoned. Too bad they didn't offer rewards. They could have filled a second Gitmo in just a few months time.

Infiltration weakened the KKK. Their recruiting levels dropped off severely.

Guess I'll Google for my local tea party assemblies today. Hey! I'm a new member!
 
It isn't so much the product of these infiltrations.. but the mere threat of it that does the damage. Otherwise rational individuals are scared stiff to be labeled homophobes, racist, whatever... so they will more likely not join the fray.

So the infiltrations have worked without so much a single protest being "infiltrated".

There is a certain portion of the population that get the movement, there is a certain portion that are scared sh!tless of it, and there are those that only know what they are told void of any actual experience..

The CURE for the Tea Party SH!TSTORM is for you to attend one and realize that the liberal attack machine is exactly that, and that those at those rallies are simply after 3 things: Smaller government, less taxes, and less interference from the totalitarian progressives in Washington.

Wouldn't it be a hoot if the liberals would USE the Constitution (instead of simply disclaiming it) and take their fight where it belongs... their STATE CAPITAL! It's a shame the totalitarians have duped the libs into wasting their efforts, to support them in simply obtaining more and more power for a corrupt system in Washington.
 
ConservaBill said:
The CURE for the Tea Party SH!TSTORM is for you to attend one and realize that the liberal attack machine is exactly that, and that those at those rallies are simply after 3 things: Smaller government, less taxes, and less interference from the totalitarian progressives in Washington.
Click to expand...

Those three items are all excuses to cover the TP's real agenda of demanding a return to White rule.

smaller government - perhaps we should stop building bridges and interstate highways. What do you care about how "big" the government is - it's exactly big enough to support the demands of the American people.

less taxes - most people's taxes were decreased this year, so WTF are you crying about?

less interference from the totalitarian repressives - Oh for God's sake, WTF does this mean anyway, that you think someone wants to take your guns away? Grow up!
 
WillRockwell said:
Those three items are all excuses to cover the TP's real agenda of demanding a return to White rule.

smaller government - perhaps we should stop building bridges and interstate highways. What do you care about how "big" the government is - it's exactly big enough to support the demands of the American people.

less taxes - most people's taxes were decreased this year, so WTF are you crying about?

less interference from the totalitarian repressives - Oh for God's sake, WTF does this mean anyway, that you think someone wants to take your guns away? Grow up!
Click to expand...





Awesome, Extremist logic always fosters intelligent discourse...:roll:



Please link to one tea party member who says government should not build bridges.
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
Awesome, Extremist logic always fosters intelligent discourse...:roll:



Please link to one tea party member who says government should not build bridges.
Click to expand...

Nagh... he's too busy trolling to worry about logic and civility..
 
reefedjib said:
My Dad is skeptically attending a Tea Party event in Myrtle Beach, SC today. He thinks it is going to be mainly attended by whack jobs. I told him to spread the word about the Whigs!
Click to expand...

Are you saying that whack jobs will be wearing wigs ? $%^&***&^%^
 
WillRockwell said:
Those three items are all excuses to cover the TP's real agenda of demanding a return to White rule.

smaller government - perhaps we should stop building bridges and interstate highways. What do you care about how "big" the government is - it's exactly big enough to support the demands of the American people.

less taxes - most people's taxes were decreased this year, so WTF are you crying about?

less interference from the totalitarian repressives - Oh for God's sake, WTF does this mean anyway, that you think someone wants to take your guns away? Grow up!
Click to expand...

Idiotic point! Nicely done!

White rule, black rule, green rule, if it will reduce the size of the federal government and pay off the deficit, count me in. Hell...I like purple...lets go with purple rule.

Are you so incredibly invested in the federal government that you OPPOSE reducing federal and deficit spending? Do you actually support federal spending that has taken us 13.5 trillion dollars in debt? Certainly you cant be THAT kind of moron...someone that just kneejerk opposes ideas and people because they dont support your destructive political ideology...
 
Hey textmaster --

I found one of those infiltrators for ya:

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMaXx8gbAHM"]YouTube- victoria.MOV[/nomedia]

She had them all singing along with her.

Hugh -- any comments? The whole friggin' crowd was singing with her!! Now tell us what the Tea Party is!:roll::roll:
 
VanceMack said:
Idiotic point! Nicely done!

White rule, black rule, green rule, if it will reduce the size of the federal government and pay off the deficit, count me in. Hell...I like purple...lets go with purple rule.

Are you so incredibly invested in the federal government that you OPPOSE reducing federal and deficit spending? Do you actually support federal spending that has taken us 13.5 trillion dollars in debt? Certainly you cant be THAT kind of moron...someone that just kneejerk opposes ideas and people because they dont support your destructive political ideology...
Click to expand...

It was Republicans, including many who are now Teabaggers, who wasted the surplus and poured our economy into the sands of Iraq. I have little sympathy for the economic ideas of the Tea Party, or those who, having broke the economy, now whine about the expense of fixing it.
 
hazlnut said:
Hey textmaster --
Click to expand...

Who is that? How long have I been posting here and you still can't even spell my name right? Whats wrong with you? Never mind, I forgot there is a text limit and i wouldn't want to cut your answer short.

I found one of those infiltrators for ya:
Click to expand...
YouTube- victoria.MOV

She had them all singing along with her.
Click to expand...


LOL So the hell what? How does this disprove the OP?

Oh thats right, it doesn't.

At least I'm honest enough in my profile to describe my political leanings hazlnut.

You are about as moderate as Hanoi Jane :rofl
 
Last edited:
We had one couple show up in ATL.. they THOUGHT they were gettin' it done.. until they figured out the reason every one was taking their picture was a lady beside them with a sign pointing out what they were... the real joke. :doh They shortly wondered back to their socialist utopia (and drank copious Smirnoff Ice beverages I'm sure)..

I wonder when the rest of the marxist progressives are going to learn the lesson these two learned last night... that is how ridiculous and childish they are, that freedom loving Americans see them as a laughing stock, and that the progressive minions are one a one-way trip back to where they belong, under a slimy rock.. just like FDR's marxist minions so many years ago...HOOWHAA!

In the darkest hours Liberty's light shines the brightest!!!
 
Beaverton school officials place tea party crasher teacher on leave during investigation
By Melissa Navas, The Oregonian
April 15, 2010, 1:17PM
BEAVERTON -- Jason Levin, the Conestoga Middle School teacher who created the "Crash the Tea Party" Web site, has been placed on paid administrative leave while Beaverton school officials investigate whether he inappropriately used school equipment or time to work on his Web site.


EPIC FAIL:rofl
 
[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYfmShJe5MA&feature=player_embedded#"]YouTube- How to Deal With TEA Party Infiltrators.[/nomedia]!
 
WillRockwell said:
It was Republicans, including many who are now Teabaggers, who wasted the surplus and poured our economy into the sands of Iraq. I have little sympathy for the economic ideas of the Tea Party, or those who, having broke the economy, now whine about the expense of fixing it.
Click to expand...

Dont be an ideological idiot. it wasnt 'republicans'...it was politicians...on BOTH sides. Democrats AND republicans. Who do you think has had control over the budget since 2006?

The 'Tea Party' isnt a political party. No person that has joined the tea party movement is responsible for driving us into the debt. They object to the rampant and out of control government spending...to the tune of 13.5 trillion in debt and counting.

Of course...no DEMOCRAT voted for the war. Of course...Bill Clinton didnt send us to war in Bosnia and keep us in that land and obligate American taxpayer dollars for...what...14 years now...and didnt launch 8 different attacks and didnt endorse 17 failed UN resoloutions...did he.

Politicians...BOTH SIDES...have caused this debt. And maybe...JUST maybe...if people werent such blind ideological muppets and didnt blanket endorse party ideals they MIGHT recognize that there isnt a dimes difference between the two parties and both parties have spent us into this hole and MAYBE its time we demand they STOP.

Of course...the un and underemployed crippled and dependent pets wont object the left ideology...because they want...no...NEED mommy to continue to take care of them. Pathetic.
 
texmaster said:
At least I'm honest enough in my profile to describe my political leanings hazlnut.

You are about as moderate as Hanoi Jane :rofl
Click to expand...

LOL, I was thinking more along the lines of Trotsky.

Bottom line, the fervor in the tea party is shared by many, many people that don't subscribe to the tea party, including a huge percentage of independents and even conservative Democrats, who are a dying breed.

This is real. The underlying anger toward this administration is more palpable among more people than anything I've ever seen, even Carter.

These tired tactics might work in a calmer place and time, but not now. People are awake, and if November weren't around the corner, they'd be ready to take up pitchforks in the streets.

People are just pissed.
 
VanceMack said:
Dont be an ideological idiot. it wasnt 'republicans'...it was politicians...on BOTH sides. Democrats AND republicans. Who do you think has had control over the budget since 2006?

The 'Tea Party' isnt a political party. No person that has joined the tea party movement is responsible for driving us into the debt. They object to the rampant and out of control government spending...to the tune of 13.5 trillion in debt and counting.

Of course...no DEMOCRAT voted for the war. Of course...Bill Clinton didnt send us to war in Bosnia and keep us in that land and obligate American taxpayer dollars for...what...14 years now...and didnt launch 8 different attacks and didnt endorse 17 failed UN resoloutions...did he.

Politicians...BOTH SIDES...have caused this debt. And maybe...JUST maybe...if people werent such blind ideological muppets and didnt blanket endorse party ideals they MIGHT recognize that there isnt a dimes difference between the two parties and both parties have spent us into this hole and MAYBE its time we demand they STOP.

Of course...the un and underemployed crippled and dependent pets wont object the left ideology...because they want...no...NEED mommy to continue to take care of them. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

No reason to call names, I had to report you for that.
Leadership in Washington begins in the White House, and it was the Bush administration that lobbied for the war, tax cuts, all the items that broke this economy. Democrats didn't vote "for the war", they voted to grant the president the power to deal with Saddam Hussein, and they did it after being fed a concoction of lies about WMD and the Iraqi nuclear capability. If you and the Republicans ever want to be granted the trust of governing this country again, you should start by accepting responsibility for placing a fool in the presidency.
 
WillRockwell said:
No reason to call names, I had to report you for that.
Leadership in Washington begins in the White House, and it was the Bush administration that lobbied for the war, tax cuts, all the items that broke this economy. Democrats didn't vote "for the war", they voted to grant the president the power to deal with Saddam Hussein, and they did it after being fed a concoction of lies about WMD and the Iraqi nuclear capability. If you and the Republicans ever want to be granted the trust of governing this country again, you should start by accepting responsibility for placing a fool in the presidency.
Click to expand...

Own it...its all you baby.

Are you REALLY that stupid though or do you JUST follow some idiotic script? Bush used the smae intel that Clinton had. read the comments from the Bush admin and the Clinton admin...and tell me there is a difference. Read Bush's comments about the nuclear threat and Obamas comments and tell me there is a difference. Clinton spent 8 years keeping our troops in Saudi, Kuwait, and Turkey and spent hundreds of billions of dollars and enforced the 'no fly zone' and launched 8 seperate attacks. He declared war against a sovereign nation which represented ZERO threat to the US...and we are STILL there to this day spending US dollars...

Oh...but thats DIFFERENT...right?

You may not like the words...it doesnt make them not true. Mindless muppet...ideologue.

Glad you ran to mommy and reported me...that too says all I will ever need to know about you.
 
WillRockwell said:
No reason to call names, I had to report you for that.
Leadership in Washington begins in the White House, and it was the Bush administration that lobbied for the war, tax cuts, all the items that broke this economy. Democrats didn't vote "for the war", they voted to grant the president the power to deal with Saddam Hussein, and they did it after being fed a concoction of lies about WMD and the Iraqi nuclear capability. If you and the Republicans ever want to be granted the trust of governing this country again, you should start by accepting responsibility for placing a fool in the presidency.
Click to expand...

Oh...and just...you know...food for thought...

I didnt vote for Bush. I left the party because of Bush and the rest of the republicans that regularly exercised fiscal irresponsibility. Not because of the war...because he and they did a lousy job of controlling the other spending. If democrats had run a candidate that was even halfway competent in 2004 Bush would not have been reelected. And it may surprise you to know that had Hillary won the dem nominatio I would have voted for her instead of Bob Barr in 2008. Im not an idealogue. I actually CARE about my country...not some idiotic notion of partisan ideology that you seem to have embraced.
 
VanceMack said:
Own it...its all you baby.

Are you REALLY that stupid though or do you JUST follow some idiotic script? Bush used the smae intel that Clinton had. read the comments from the Bush admin and the Clinton admin...and tell me there is a difference. Read Bush's comments about the nuclear threat and Obamas comments and tell me there is a difference. Clinton spent 8 years keeping our troops in Saudi, Kuwait, and Turkey and spent hundreds of billions of dollars and enforced the 'no fly zone' and launched 8 seperate attacks. He declared war against a sovereign nation which represented ZERO threat to the US...and we are STILL there to this day spending US dollars...

Oh...but thats DIFFERENT...right?

You may not like the words...it doesnt make them not true. Mindless muppet...ideologue.

Glad you ran to mommy and reported me...that too says all I will ever need to know about you.
Click to expand...

Clinton didn't try to start a war on his intel. Cheney spent weeks at the CIA throwing his weight around until he had "intel" that satisfied his needs. Please don't pretend you weren't alive then, or that the rest of us have forgotten.
 
WillRockwell said:
No reason to call names, I had to report you for that.
Leadership in Washington begins in the White House, and it was the Bush administration that lobbied for the war, tax cuts, all the items that broke this economy. Democrats didn't vote "for the war", they voted to grant the president the power to deal with Saddam Hussein, and they did it after being fed a concoction of lies about WMD and the Iraqi nuclear capability. If you and the Republicans ever want to be granted the trust of governing this country again, you should start by accepting responsibility for placing a fool in the presidency.
Click to expand...

Try reading some history. The war didn't bring down the economy, the housing market did and the liberals in congress forced banks to make loans to people who couldn't afford it and guess what happened, they couldn't pay and the economy when in the ****ter.

This isn't rocket science. At least do some research beyond moveon.org.
 
WillRockwell said:
Clinton didn't try to start a war on his intel. Cheney spent weeks at the CIA throwing his weight around until he had "intel" that satisfied his needs. Please don't pretend you weren't alive then, or that the rest of us have forgotten.
Click to expand...

If you are going to lie, at least cite some kind of evidence for this charge against cheney.

And I don't mean an Op Ed.
 
WillRockwell said:
Clinton didn't try to start a war on his intel. Cheney spent weeks at the CIA throwing his weight around until he had "intel" that satisfied his needs. Please don't pretend you weren't alive then, or that the rest of us have forgotten.
Click to expand...

Did or did not Clinton take us to war in Bosnia? Based on what justification?And as for Iraq...nah...he just spent 8 years endorsing 17 failed UN resloutions and launching multiple attacks. God what a freqin muppet.

Tell you what sparky...Ive got over a thousand posts...find ONE where I have blanket endorsed Bush and the republicans. You wont find it...but good luck. Every post has been about fiscal responsibility, smaller government, and even social spending but done at a state level.

Whereas you, dear teacup, swallow everything you are fed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom