Again, look at the last 2 examples. In both cases she is arguing to change the law on gay marriage and both examples she uses polls to boost her argument to that effect.
Sadly I couldn't look at the last two you posted. One's 50 pages long, one
The one in the thread "Fox News Poll: Most Voters Say Allow Gays to Serve Openly" was not advocating that the law be changed because of the poll numbers. It was expressing shock that the poll numbers were that high. How in the world you get that saying "WOW, those were higher than I thought" equals "Wow, I now believe we must change the law specifically because this poll says so" is beyond me, or anyone actually looking at this honestly.
Your link for the one in "Health Care Bill has passed" so not searching 30 pages on that.
In regards to the quote you posted for th thread "New Jersey Senate Defeats Gay Marriage Bill" (BTW, if you quote these things right it helps to make your argument not look like you're hiding something. Having to search through 17 pages because you don't quote it right is frustrating) again, no where is Redress advocating changing the law because of a Poll. Redress was pointing out that according to Polling data the American peoples views on homosexuality has became more and more moderated in regards to the morality of it and that based on that fact they believe the laws will end up changing.
Note, there is a LARGE difference between saying "The law should change because the majority of people in this poll approve of changing it" and "I think eventually the laws are going to end up changing as more and more people begin to think in a certain way, as evidenced by 'X' poll".
In one case you're advocating for a new law based on the poll. In the other case you're saying you think eventually that laws will changed based on the publics views on the issue.
To put it another way....
Saying "The Health Care Bill should be over turned because 58% of the people want it overturned" is saying that the law should be altered BECAUSE of a poll. Saying "The Health Care Bill will likely be over turned in the coming years since those that want its repeal has shown a steady increase, from 54% to 58%, and I believe that will continue" is citing a trend and making an assertion based on it.
Lets continue looking
In the thread you linked "Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell" again, redress's statement was not saying change the law based on a Poll. Redress was using a poll to show that someones assertion on why the law shouldn't change, countering Fiddlytree's statement that "I think it is an exaggeration to say 'The American people' are open to this."
Fiddly tried to made an opinion, his belief it was an exaggeration. Redress provided facts to show that his opinion was likely wrong, and that it may not be an exaggeration to say the "American People" are open to it. This is not to say that is why the law should change, but simply responding to an argument someone else had made.
In not a single, solitary post you quoted was there evidence of Redress suggesting that a Law should be changed or made based simply on the outcome of a Poll.
The ONLY way you can criticize Redress as being hypocritical or wrong in their statement earlier is if you read their statement as a LITERAL statement, suggesting that they NEVER use polls in any way, in which case I'm eagerly awaiting to see you jump into the Rush Limbaugh thread and demand he get his ass down to Costa Rica.