• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DA: sex ed could get teachers arrested

You want to teach kids how to ****, then insist that teen pregger rates will go down. You can't be serious.

Well now this is just shrill, dishonest mouthfoaming. No one in this thread has insisted that teens be taught how to "****" as you so crudely put it.

Try debating rather than whatever it is you think you are doing here.
 
"can", and, "might". Where's the source that proves that it does?

Massive fail!!

How is it a massive fail? The fact that what we are teaching in a comprehensive sex ed classroom is 60% better than no sex ed and 30% than abstinence-only sex ed is a good thing. And you are asking for 100% in a subject area that is still changing and trying to find better ways to teach. I sure as hell support mights and cans over nothing.

And you know what you keep on saying massive fail to might and cans, but what do you suggest we do? And I am expecting an answer because you don't need to back it up with sources, something you have proven so far you won't do. But what do you personally what kids to learn about in terms of sex ed?
 
Well now this is just shrill, dishonest mouthfoaming. No one in this thread has insisted that teens be taught how to "****" as you so crudely put it.

Try debating rather than whatever it is you think you are doing here.

What is sex ed about, then? Don't they teach kids basic anatomy, thereby showing them what hole to put his tally-whacker in? If that's not teaching them how to ****, then what would you call it?
 
You want to teach kids how to ****, then insist that teen pregger rates will go down. You can't be serious.

First, post where I said that.

Second, that doesn't back up your statement. So far they've given evidence that lends credibility to theirs. You've provided nothing.
 
So, apdst, where are your links proving your assertion? We are still waiting with baited breath to see if you've got ANYTHING.
 
First, post where I said that.

Second, that doesn't back up your statement. So far they've given evidence that lends credibility to theirs. You've provided nothing.

I never said you said that.
 
So, apdst, where are your links proving your assertion? We are still waiting with baited breath to see if you've got ANYTHING.

I have given up on links. The continually asking for sources is starting to really hurt my broken right hand and sprained left wrist. I instead want to know what he would rather we do instead of sex ed.
 
I have given up on links. The continually asking for sources is starting to really hurt my broken right hand and sprained left wrist. I instead want to know what he would rather we do instead of sex ed.

Masturbation accident huh?

This is why we need sex ed:mrgreen:
 
I have given up on links. The continually asking for sources is starting to really hurt my broken right hand and sprained left wrist. I instead want to know what he would rather we do instead of sex ed.

Copy and paste is your friend. :mrgreen:

So, apdst, where are your links proving your assertion? We are still waiting with baited breath to see if you've got ANYTHING.
 
I never said you said that.

You're correct.

You've never said anything other than your opinion to back up your statements.

Thus why I'm asking if you have anything to provide, if not their "might" and actual evidence is greater than what you've provided.

Which is nothing
 
So, apdst, where are your links proving your assertion? We are still waiting with baited breath to see if you've got ANYTHING.
 
And you know what you keep on saying massive fail to might and cans, but what do you suggest we do? And I am expecting an answer because you don't need to back it up with sources, something you have proven so far you won't do. But what do you personally what kids to learn about in terms of sex ed?
 
What is sex ed about, then? Don't they teach kids basic anatomy, thereby showing them what hole to put his tally-whacker in? If that's not teaching them how to ****, then what would you call it?

Oh so now you have a problem with teaching kids basic biology. I don't know what to tell you then because it's going to be taught to them and you are just going to have to deal with that.
 
I do not send my kids to school to learn how to roll a condom on their/his penis.

What's next? How to give a blow job without scraping your teeth and causing a potential infection?

Gimme a break. School was not meant for this. American children by and large are just plain stupid. I interview people regularly that just leave me shaking my head about how ridiculously uneducated they are at such an advanced age. THAT is the bigger problem.


Guess you want them to remian stupid about sex ed., huh? :roll:

It shocks me that so many adults do not want Little Jimmy and Jane to learn how to protect themselves from STD's that can kill em. Not to mention protect them from having a little Jimmy Jr.

Wake The Hell Up People! :(
 
Oh so now you have a problem with teaching kids basic biology. I don't know what to tell you then because it's going to be taught to them and you are just going to have to deal with that.

When I took biology in school, it didn't include teaching us how to ****.
 
When I took biology in school, it didn't include teaching us how to ****.

Then you were just too dense to understand that tab A (penis) goes into slot B (vagina).

And no one is teaching anyone "how to ****", your shrill caterwauling notwithstanding. Biology includes sexual reproduction and most kids get that if they aren't rocking the 47th chromosome. And even then, they figure it out, too.
 
When I took biology in school, it didn't include teaching us how to ****.

I have backspaced over a dozen jokes. Not worth the thread ban...
 
Then you were just too dense to understand that tab A (penis) goes into slot B (vagina).

And no one is teaching anyone "how to ****", your shrill caterwauling notwithstanding. Biology includes sexual reproduction and most kids get that if they aren't rocking the 47th chromosome. And even then, they figure it out, too.

Ok, let me put it another way. Do you have kids?
 
Irrelevant. But yes, I have one.

No, it's very relevant. Do you want your kid to take a class to learn how to **** in high school?

As a parent, I don't.
 
No, it's very relevant. Do you want your kid to take a class to learn how to **** in high school?

As a parent, I don't.

They don't teach you have to have sex in sex ed. What they teach you is that if you are to find yourself having sex be smart about it and protect yourself.
 
No, it's very relevant.

No, it is entirely irrelevant to this discussion as the discussion is not about me. It is about the topic.

And no one has asserted that kids take classes to learn how to ****. You are being completely dishonest and shrill as fingernails on a chalkboard in your commitment to spreading this blatant lie.
 
They don't teach you have to have sex in sex ed. What they teach you is that if you are to find yourself having sex be smart about it and protect yourself.

There's no reasoning with him. He has devolved to mindless jabbering and slavering idiocy because he was owned in the discussion early on. He's just gonna repeat the same shrill lie over and over again despite reality telling a completely different tale.
 
Well, since his opinion has been duly noted, I wish he'd stop posting it over and over again- same exact opinion, same exact words. Kids taught to **** in class. Etc, etc.
Yes, we get it.

He's just wasting bandwidth and disrupting the flow of reasonable discussion on this thread, a behavior which I believe is known in some quarters as "trolling".
 
Back
Top Bottom