- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,824
- Reaction score
- 68,902
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
I'm not saying the GOVT should be able to arbitrarily strip citizenship for any reason. But a terrorist who has plotted against the US can hardly expect sympathy.
But it then sounds as if that's exactly the argument you want to make. Because who designates "terrorist"? It's not us, it's the government. If you're saying that once designated a "terrorist", one shouldn't expect the protections of the Constitution; then you are saying it's up to the government to apply at their digression the namesake "terrorist" and once doing so remove themselves from the constraints and rules of the Constitution.