• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Economy Added 162,000 Jobs in March, Most in 3 Years

and the biggie---DEBT

the 2009 and 2010 budgets BORROW an astonishing THREE TRILLION dollars, some 14% of gdp

that's not SUSTAINABLE

the NEW YORK TIMES, the president's pet press partner (did you read politico's piece on the topic this week?), forecasts service on our debts, MERE INTEREST ALONE, will approach A TRIL PER YEAR by 2016, 2017

the grey lady laments leadership's reliance on PHONY NUMBERS to project ITS estimation of some EIGHT HUNDRED BILLION service costs by decade's end

the white house (like all white houses) depends on unrealistically rosey GROWTH numbers AS WELL AS fantastically friendly INTEREST RATES

when the lady adjusted those two fundamentals underlying service costs, well, that's how SHE arrived at A TRIL PER YEAR in interest somewhere around mid decade

very worrisome, don't you think?

The growing fiscal challenge is entirely a different issue from the current and near-term state of the economy/labor market.

• Is the economy in the midst of a recovery? The growing body of data, including the new GDP report, show that the economy is in a moderate-paced recovery. Since the last quarter of contraction (2009 Q2), real GDP has expanded 2.7%. To put things into perspective, three quarters following the last quarter of contraction in the 1990-91 recession, real GDP expanded 1.5%. In the 2001 recession, that figure was 1.8%. A moderate-paced recovery is underway. No one here is arguing that an economic boom is underway. Moreover, I expect the long-term growth to amount to less than what occurred during the 1980s and 1990s due to the nation's debt overhang/competitiveness issues in certain economic sectors/structural damage caused by the housing bubble, etc. But again, that does not require one to ignore the reality that the economy has resumed expansion. The data show that it has.

• Is the labor market growing? Most data indicate that the labor market has stabilized. There is some data suggesting that the labor market may be in the early stages of a resumption of growth. By this summer, I expect that it will be clear that the labor market is again expanding. That does not mean that the economy will be anywhere close to full employment anytime soon. Given the sizable structural component to the unemployment problem, a full employment situation is not likely anytime soon.

• Are there major fiscal imbalances? There are. Those imbalances could undermine growth in the medium- and longer-term. They do not mean that the economy is not in a recovery right now.

As I've commented frequently on the need for a credible fiscal consolidation effort (discretionary spending cuts; mandatory spending reform/fundamental health reform to deal with the excess cost growth issue; tax hikes) beginning as early as 2011, my recognition of the existence of such fiscal imbalances and their associated medium- and long-term economic, political, and social risks is clear.

But that's an entirely different issue from the above two matters. Recognition of the gravity of the fiscal challenges does not require one to deny the moderate growth that is now underway nor preclude the possibility of labor market expansion that could occur in coming months as the cyclical recovery advances (as is likely despite the presence of headwinds in some sectors).

In the end, I can understand that the resumption of economic growth and later, job growth, is inconvenient for the political leaders who forecast 'endless recession' or worse in opposing various public policy decisions/changes. That economic recovery and job growth will undermine their credibility in the face of their gloomy predictions and will likely begin to impact electoral outcomes as the recovery advances and unemployment rate begins to fall is completely their problem. That such dire forecasts and exaggeration closely echo those made in 1982-83 following a severe recession and contentious policy environment is not at all surprising in the context of human behavior.
 
The growing fiscal challenge is entirely a different issue from the current and near-term state of the economy/labor market.

hardly

the "growing fiscal challenge," as the ny times patiently explains in detail (and common english), is IN YO' FACE by about TWENTY SIXTEEN, or thereabouts

ie, "long term" and "current/near term" are morphing into NOW

Is the economy in the midst of a recovery?

the economy cannot recover, almost by definition, until the FIXES for what ails us are in place

But again, that does not require one to ignore the reality that the economy has resumed expansion

fine, but there's a whole lot more to an economy

As I've commented frequently on the need for a credible fiscal consolidation effort (discretionary spending cuts; mandatory spending reform/fundamental health reform to deal with the excess cost growth issue; tax hikes) beginning as early as 2011...

1. there is no "credible fiscal consolidation effort" even being CONTEMPLATED for 2011

2. not here on earth, leastaways

3. maybe in some chatroom there is

4. 2011 is way too late

my recognition of the existence of such fiscal imbalances and their associated medium- and long-term economic, political, and social risks is clear

good for you

and your recognition of two plus two adding to four is equally clear, no one (who can understand you) can fault you

In the end, I can understand that the resumption of economic growth and later, job growth, is inconvenient for the political leaders who forecast 'endless recession' or worse in opposing various public policy decisions/changes.

1. what public policy decisions/changes?

2. the 2009/2010 budgets?

3. the continued hamp'ing of those already hamp'ed?

4. the roofless reconstruction of fannie and fred, accounted by cbo already to cost the taxpayer 400B?

5. the exemption of the f's from dead dodd's legislation?

6. the failure to address the yuan?

7. the mandate upon at&t and the others to book an extra billion each for obamacare?

8. the 200B mandate placed on already bankrupt states in the form of expanded medicaid?

9. 86% of the american people describe their economy as in crisis---are ALL of them saying so for "political convenience?"

10. LOL!
 
Last edited:
hardly

the "growing fiscal challenge," as the ny times patiently explains in detail (and common english), is IN YO' FACE by about TWENTY SIXTEEN, or thereabouts

At least you're consistent. Ignoring the fact that such fiscal issues will require higher taxes and decreased discretionary spending.

ie, "long term" and "current/near term" are morphing into NOW

This is not 2017. In the absence of an economic recovery, the US will be exceedingly more challenged to tackle the long term fiscal issues. It seems backwards (at least to me) to begin addressing the fiscal uncertainties projected seven years from now, before we deal with unemployment economic confidence.

the economy cannot recover, almost by definition, until the FIXES for what ails us are in place

There are no "fixes" to cyclical downturns; only remedies that lessen the severity of the symptoms. Make no mistake, unemployment is not a result of the spending from Washington (you would be hard pressed to make even a somewhat relevant argument for such a statement).

fine, but there's a whole lot more to an economy

Employment (income determinant) and consumer spending (a function of the income determinant) are the main drivers in the US economy. Nobody has said housing is not an issue, but it is and will be a slow process. There is no way to boost the real estate sector without driving up long term interest rates.

1. there is no "credible fiscal consolidation effort" even being CONTEMPLATED for 2011

Do you have anything to support such an empty statement? How about one of those nice articles you seem to fancy; the ones from months ago?

2. 2011 is way too late

Incorrect! Given the content of your recent posts, i am very much so justified in this statement.

and your recognition of two plus two adding to four is equally clear, no one (who can understand you) can fault you

Non sequitur. Nothing you have posted negates both the objectivity and accuracy of Don's post(s). Absolutely nothing (because your posts lack both familiarity and substance).

1. what public policy decisions/changes?

2. the 2009/2010 budgets?

Already addressed.

3. the continued hamp'ing of those already hamp'ed?

At least make a minimal attempt at clarity.

4. the roofless reconstruction of fannie and fred, accounted by cbo already to cost the taxpayer 400B?

Opinionated drivel and nothing more.

5. the exemption of the f's from dead dodd's legislation?

Just a political talking point.

6. the failure to address the yuan?

Provide a detailed response on how you would address this issue. Keep in mind the thin line between "gains in consuming outside ones productive capacity" and "trade imbalance".

7. the mandate upon at&t and the others to book an extra billion each for obamacare?

This has already been addressed ad nauseam.

8. the 200B mandate placed on already bankrupt states in the form of expanded medicaid?

So the Federal government should pick up that tab? Or could you just be politicizing the health care bill because your favorite talk radio host does so on a daily basis.

9. 86% of the american people describe their economy as in crisis---are ALL of them saying so for "political convenience?"

86% of a poll, not 86% of the American people. For the record, 86% of the American people are not politically active, or financially/economically literate.


The jokes on you.
 
At least you're consistent. Ignoring the fact that such fiscal issues will require higher taxes and decreased discretionary spending.

tell it to obama, cuz he aint doin neither

"decreased discretionary spending," by the way, aint gonna cut it

ask don

LOL!

This is not 2017. In the absence of an economic recovery, the US will be exceedingly more challenged to tackle the long term fiscal issues. It seems backwards (at least to me) to begin addressing the fiscal uncertainties projected seven years from now, before we deal with unemployment economic confidence.

don's the one calling for a "credible fiscal consolidation effort" by 2011

There are no "fixes" to cyclical downturns

there are, however, fixes for the causes of the downturns

hello

Make no mistake, unemployment is not a result of the spending from Washington (you would be hard pressed to make even a somewhat relevant argument for such a statement).

who you arguin with now?

none of my links (LOL!) suggests such

Nobody has said housing is not an issue, but it is and will be a slow process.

unfortunately, it's going backwards

commerce's own report has housing investment down a terrifying TEN POINT NINE %

foreclosures are projected to RISE by a savage SIXTY PERCENT this year over awful 09

There is no way to boost the real estate sector without driving up long term interest rates.

i know, that's why there's no way out

despite all the polysyllabic optimism from certain quarters

Do you have anything to support such an empty statement?

what, that leadership has offered NOTHING in the way of that "credible fiscal consolidation effort" we're all looking for?

LOL!

just what "credible fiscal consolidation" is in the offing?

How about one of those nice articles you seem to fancy; the ones from months ago?

the oldest article linked is november, last year

it's the ny times piece that explains how interest payments will approach a tril per year by right around mid decade

read it

it answers several of the other questions you've put to me in the past

LOL!

Incorrect! Given the content of your recent posts, i am very much so justified in this statement.

sorry, 2011 is too late to get started on the cfc, credible fiscal consolidation (LOL!)

ask bernanke

Bernanke says prompt action needed on deficit - Yahoo! News

ask orszag

UPDATE 1-W.House's Orszag warns of dangers of huge deficits | Reuters

ask the commission

?Debt Like Cancer? Addressed by Obama Commission on U.S. Debt - Bloomberg.com

Non sequitur. Nothing you have posted negates both the objectivity and accuracy of Don's post(s).

in my opinion don, when he's not telling us his personal projections (which we all treasure), merely states the obvious

Opinionated drivel and nothing more.

"Together the two firms [fannie and fred] have already tapped $125 billion from government lifelines and the Congressional Budget Office predicts they ultimately will drain $380 billion. That would far exceed the final tabs for rescuing the big banks, the automakers or even insurance behemoth American International Group (AIG)."

"Fannie and Freddie aren't mentioned in either the Senate or House financial regulatory reform bills."

Why Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Continue To Cost US Taxpayers Billions

Just a political talking point.

"The Treasury said on Dec. 24 it would provide an unlimited amount of assistance to the companies as needed for the next three years to alleviate market concern that the government lifeline for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the largest source of money for U.S. home loans, could lapse or be exhausted."

U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on Fannie, Freddie, Wallison Says - Bloomberg.com

Provide a detailed response on how you would address this issue.

the yuan?

ask obama, ask bernanke, they're the ones getting paid to solve these problems

So the Federal government should pick up that tab?

well, someone should

cuz the 200B in expanded medicaid costs HAVE been mandated on new york, california, pennsylvania, michigan...

and our states ARE drastically upside down, as you know

how are we ever gonna get to cfc (LOL!) with this "mother of unfunded mandates," as departing dem governor of tennessee phil bredesen so famously calls it

Or could you just be politicizing the health care bill because your favorite talk radio host does so on a daily basis.

dr laura does health care?

86% of a poll, not 86% of the American people.

that's what a poll is, silly

For the record, 86% of the American people are not politically active, or financially/economically literate.

still, they're the ones who decide who sits in the white house, the senate, the state capitols...

The jokes on you.

you sound like obama

President Obama's strategy gets personal - Jonathan Allen and Carol E. Lee - POLITICO.com

LOL!
 
in my opinion don, when he's not telling us his personal projections (which we all treasure), merely states the obvious...

Sadly, the "obvious," namely that the economy is in the midst of a moderate-paced recovery, seems less than obvious. For example, loud denials of the ongoing moderate economic recovery and stabilization/possible emerging resumption of growth in the labor market that is broadcast almost daily by political pundits/commentators distorts the picture of what actually is happening economically.

Why do, for example, certain talk show hosts talk down the ongoing economic recovery even as the evidence for the recovery mounts? They are peddling political interests, not economic analysis. The reality of an economic recovery is highly inconvenient with respect to the entrenched political positions they adopted, often with sweeping and exaggerated rhetoric. After all, according to those pundits, the fiscal stimulus plan (which one could argue for or against on cost-benefit propositions, efficiency, etc.) wasn't supposed to allow for a resumption of growth. Now, despite all the angry rhetoric and grim doom-and-gloom forecasts they had broadcast over the air waves almost ad nauseum, it is clear to objective observers that the economy has turned. In addition, there is emerging evidence that the job market is starting to turn, as well.

Finally, as far as dates or ideas are concerned, I cite them for illustrative purposes. That, for example, I mentioned the 2011 starting point for fiscal consolidation (message #108 in this thread and elsewhere) is not so much a matter of "personal opinion" but an assessment consistent with macroeconomic developments and principles of mainstream economics (namely the widespread belief that withdrawal of stimulus/fiscal consolidation should wait until the recovery is sustained). Not surprisingly, in its 4/21 World Economic Outlook, the IMF advised, "Looking further ahead, if macroeconomic developments proceed as expected, most advanced economies should embark on significant fiscal consolidation in 2011."
 
loud denials of the ongoing moderate economic recovery and stabilization/possible emerging resumption of growth in the labor market that is broadcast almost daily by political pundits/commentators distorts the picture of what actually is happening economically.

oh, no, my esteemed, eggheady amigo, what's happening in the housing market and to the deficit and with the service costs and concerning f&f and about at&t and consumer confidence and greece and the state budgets and what's not happening concerning the yuan and the credible fiscal consolidations are tragically NOT DISTORTIONS

Why do, for example, certain talk show hosts talk down the ongoing economic recovery even as the evidence for the recovery mounts?

i don't know, you'd have to ask them, whoever they are

but i'll tell you, your psychology is not as impressive (to me) as your economics, even if the latter do strike me as somewhat tedious

despite all the angry rhetoric

the only anger i see is 3 posts up

it is clear to objective observers that the economy has turned

86% aren't objective?

That, for example, I mentioned the 2011 starting point for fiscal consolidation (message #108 in this thread and elsewhere) is not so much a matter of "personal opinion" but an assessment consistent with macroeconomic developments and principles of mainstream economics

yes, i know, i appreciate that

those macroeconomic developments and principles are spot on

unfortunately, the cfc's you call for are NOT happening

and they're not going to happen, as you've repeatedly intimated

sad
 
Last edited:
For the fourth month in a row, the U.S. experienced net job growth. April saw the net creation of 290,000 jobs. Average weekly hours also ticked higher for the second consecutive month, further underlining the cyclical economic rebound that is now underway.

However, as the labor market grew even more sharply (805,000) on optimism that the labor market had stabilized and had possibly been moving into the early stages of renewed expansion, the nation's unemployment rate rose to 9.9%. Often as the labor market stabilizes, workers re-entering the workforce exceed job growth. That phenomenom contributes to the unemployment rate's being a lagging indicator of economic growth.

On the more worrisome note concerning the structural component of unemployment, the share of workers without jobs for 27 or more weeks increased to 45.9%.

The full report can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
 
NINE POINT NINE!

ouch!

that's devastating

i'm very sorry

thanks for the update
 
NINE POINT NINE!

ouch!

that's devastating

i'm very sorry

thanks for the update

And yesterday's 340-point drop is being followed this morning by another 200-point drop.

Meanwhile, the Dow is down almost 900 in the past four days.

There's so much air in this "recovery", Wall Street might float away.
 
And yesterday's 340-point drop is being followed this morning by another 200-point drop.

Meanwhile, the Dow is down almost 900 in the past four days.

There's so much air in this "recovery", Wall Street might float away.

Erod,

Events on Wall Street and the Greek debt situation/growing concerns over other parts of Europe do not mean that there is no cyclical recovery underway. Should the stock sell-off persist leading to a rapid significant decline in valuations e.g., 20%-30% over the next few weeks/months, or the contagion from Greece spread, those shocks could weaken or even undermine the current economic recovery, that just now may be spreading into the labor market. In short, there remain headwinds (commercial real estate sector) and near-term risks (Greek debt situation, among others). The handoff from stimulus to private demand could also be somewhat tricky.
 
Erod,

Events on Wall Street and the Greek debt situation/growing concerns over other parts of Europe do not mean that there is no cyclical recovery underway.

Nor do fabricated temporary government jobs mean a recovery is underway.

Once the GOP regains control of Congress in November as expected, business will begin to relax knowing President Doofus can't do any more damage the next two years.

The more business feels that is inevitable, the more hiring risk they will take on.
 
Nor do fabricated temporary government jobs mean a recovery is underway.

From the employment situation report:

In April, nonfarm payroll employment rose by 290,000. Sizable employment gains occurred in manufacturing, professional and business services, health care, and in leisure and hospitality. Federal government employment increased due to the hiring of temporary workers for Census 2010. Since December, nonfarm payroll employment has expanded by 573,000, with 483,000 jobs added in the private sector. The vast majority of job growth occurred during the last 2 months.

From data contained in the report:

Last 3 Months:
Private sector: +467,000
Government: +92,000

Last 2 Months:
Private sector: +405,000
Government: +115,000

Most Recent Month:
Private sector: +231,000
Government: +59,000

Once the GOP regains control of Congress in November as expected...

While current polling data and off-year election experience would suggest Republican gains in the 2010 election, the magnitude of gains is far from certain. Much can change between now and Election Day. A change in control in one or both houses of Congress is not a certainty.
 
From the employment situation report:

In April, nonfarm payroll employment rose by 290,000. Sizable employment gains occurred in manufacturing, professional and business services, health care, and in leisure and hospitality. Federal government employment increased due to the hiring of temporary workers for Census 2010. Since December, nonfarm payroll employment has expanded by 573,000, with 483,000 jobs added in the private sector. The vast majority of job growth occurred during the last 2 months.

From data contained in the report:

Last 3 Months:
Private sector: +467,000
Government: +92,000

Last 2 Months:
Private sector: +405,000
Government: +115,000

Most Recent Month:
Private sector: +231,000
Government: +59,000



While current polling data and off-year election experience would suggest Republican gains in the 2010 election, the magnitude of gains is far from certain. Much can change between now and Election Day. A change in control in one or both houses of Congress is not a certainty.

And yet unemployment rose to 9.9 percent.

How many Americans will graduate high school/college and enter the job market this month?

You have to add a ton of jobs each month just to accommodate the new work force.

That's why one month of anything is really nothing.
 
Last edited:
And yet unemployment rose to 9.9 percent.

How many Americans will graduate high school/college and enter the job market this month?

You have to add a ton of jobs each month just to accommodate the new work force.

That's why one month of anything is really nothing.

The fact is the total unemployed rose to 15,260,000 and the discouraged workers rose again as well so that the real unemployment rate is closer to 17%. apparently 15.2 million unemployed people don't believe much in that hope and change.

We have a disaster in the WH who spins this as good news and his minions buy it. Facts always get in the way of Obama rhetoric.
 
And yet unemployment rose to 9.9 percent.

As noted earlier today, monthly payroll growth came to 290,000 jobs. However, the labor force expanded by 805,000 persons. The larger labor force relative to employed persons resulted in the higher unemployment rate.

How many Americans will graduate high school/college and enter the job market this month?

You have to add a ton of jobs each month just to accommodate the new work force.

Labor force stabilization and now a resumption of labor force expansion do not mean that the employment situation is strong. It, most definitely, is not. The labor market recovery is just getting started.

Younger persons, particularly those without a college degree, face a brutal unemployment situation. Those aged 16-19 had a 25.4% unemployment rate in April (down slightly from 26.1% in March). Summer jobs may well be difficult to obtain this year.

Nonetheless, the employment situation for the current college graduating class has improved. The National Association of Colleges and Employers revealed:

NACE’s 2010 Student Survey shows that nearly one-quarter (24.4 percent) of 2010 graduates who applied for a job actually have one waiting for them after graduation. In comparison, just 19.7 percent of 2009 graduates who applied for a job had one at this time last year...

This year, 39 percent of seniors taking part in the study reported they had received job offers, and 59 percent of those students took the job.

Last year, 40 percent of responding seniors were offered jobs, but only 45 percent accepted them.


That's why one month of anything is really nothing.

Posting the latest data merely shows how things have recently been trending. This thread also has earlier data. What is clear is that the labor market has stabilized. Moreover, there is now evidence that it has, in fact, resumed growth. Clearly, the situation is not anything close to full employment. Moreover, on account of the large structural component to unemployment that resulted from the recent severe recession, a full employment situation is not likely anytime soon.
 
The fact is the total unemployed rose to 15,260,000 and the discouraged workers rose again as well so that the real unemployment rate is closer to 17%. apparently 15.2 million unemployed people don't believe much in that hope and change.

We have a disaster in the WH who spins this as good news and his minions buy it. Facts always get in the way of Obama rhetoric.

The resumption of employment growth is good news, especially if it is sustained. The employment situation overall remains bad. There is a distinction between an emergent trend (beginning stages of a labor market recovery) and the present state of the employment situation.
 
The resumption of employment growth is good news, especially if it is sustained. The employment situation overall remains bad. There is a distinction between an emergent trend (beginning stages of a labor market recovery) and the present state of the employment situation.

No one knows why the labor force grew but it could have something to do with unemployment compensation running out but to focus solely on the jobs created without viewing to total picture is disengenuous and that is what this Administration is.
 
No one knows why the labor force grew but it could have something to do with unemployment compensation running out but to focus solely on the jobs created without viewing to total picture is disengenuous and that is what this Administration is.

There is no reason to turn this into a political issue, as has been attempted by many who seek to gain politically. The fact that the republican base is talking down any aspects of recovery is telling enough.

Job growth has exceeded even the optimists expectations. Admitting as much would go along ways in restoring credibility.
 
There is no reason to turn this into a political issue, as has been attempted by many who seek to gain politically. The fact that the republican base is talking down any aspects of recovery is telling enough.

Job growth has exceeded even the optimists expectations. Admitting as much would go along ways in restoring credibility.

The question is, though, whether this is happening because of government interventions, or despite government interventions. And the situation is still very terrible, we have to admit that.

I'm trying to get info on PPR right now. I'll post it here if I find it (or just make it myself).
 
The question is, though, whether this is happening because of government interventions, or despite government interventions. And the situation is still very terrible, we have to admit that.

I'm trying to get info on PPR right now. I'll post it here if I find it (or just make it myself).

Do tell me what PPR is again. Pipe penetrating radar?;)

Most certainly, fiscal and monetary stimulus have had only a positive impact on financial and employment markets.
 
Last edited:
There is no reason to turn this into a political issue, as has been attempted by many who seek to gain politically. The fact that the republican base is talking down any aspects of recovery is telling enough.

Job growth has exceeded even the optimists expectations. Admitting as much would go along ways in restoring credibility.

Actually the facts alone are quite telling and make this political. Obama had his emergency stimulus plan passed immediately to control unemployment and we all see how that has worked. The Administration is taking victory laps today for the job creation but ignoring the total results. They made it political today and someone has to point out the falacy of their claims.

I would love to give him credit but when you have an 842 billion stimulus plan that generates govt. jobs instead of really promoting the private sector I cannot do that. Job growth is meager at best and never in our history has so much been spent to generate so little.
 
Actually the facts alone are quite telling and make this political. Obama had his emergency stimulus plan passed immediately to control unemployment and we all see how that has worked. The Administration is taking victory laps today for the job creation but ignoring the total results. They made it political today and someone has to point out the falacy of their claims.

I would love to give him credit but when you have an 842 billion stimulus plan that generates govt. jobs instead of really promoting the private sector I cannot do that. Job growth is meager at best and never in our history has so much been spent to generate so little.

The optimal choice would have been nearly double the size, and more infrastructure laden.

What are these "total results" (bold)?
 
The tone of the "Hannity followers" when job creation is in full effect will be priceless. If there is job creation in the tune of 300k by summers end, the "conservative victory tour" will be a wash out.

As many have pointed out, we are no where near to a budget that isn't loosing money and 300k in jobs is a drop in the bucket. Yes its good we aren't loosing even more jobs but hardly a reason to declare victory.


Psst. Your lean says "Libertarian" instead of "Very Liberal"

When you get a chance make sure you update it. :2wave:
 
The optimal choice would have been nearly double the size, and more infrastructure laden.

What are these "total results" (bold)?


Total results include the total labor force, total unemployed, total discouraged, and the make up of the jobs created
 
Do tell me what PPR is again. Pipe penetrating radar?;)

The lower limit of where personal wealth really is. The true value is somewhere between GNP and PPR. But of course, I shouldn't have to explain to you why government expenditures aren't entirely efficient.

Most certainly, fiscal and monetary stimulus have had only a positive impact on financial and employment markets.

Yeah, if you think that trying to blow up another bubble is a good idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom