• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"All Black People" Asked to Leave S. Jersey Wal-Mart

Disprove it if you can, but I grow weary of lazy people who don't feel like doing their own research.....:doh
If you're going to make statements of fact it is up to you to source them when asked.

2) You don't want me to be banned, do you?....:2razz:
I'm beginning to think they brought Aaronssong out of retirement to get rid of me.......:lol:
No, I don't want you to get banned. So what you are saying is that the answer would get you banned?
You're dodging. Now please explain why you think "Per capita says that as a pecentage there are far more blacks on welfare & unemployment than any other category.......;)"
 
Only in some cases.

I wish I had the third party data, but it does not negate my first hand experiences. I believe you agreed with me that the attitude of a "white man's education" does in fact exist among some black communities.

I'd like to know what kinds of things could be done to combat this damaging attitude.
 
If you're going to make statements of fact it is up to you to source them when asked.


No, I don't want you to get banned. So what you are saying is that the answer would get you banned?
You're dodging. Now please explain why you think "Per capita says that as a pecentage there are far more blacks on welfare & unemployment than any other category.......;)"

See post #392.......;)
 
No, I don't want you to get banned. So what you are saying is that the answer would get you banned?
You're dodging. Now please explain why you think "Per capita says that as a pecentage there are far more blacks on welfare & unemployment than any other category.......;)"

See post #392.......;)
The most prevalent question is why there are so many blacks in poverty. Liberals argue that it is the result of continuing racism and discrimination, especially at hiring time. Conservatives have argued a variety of other causes: moral shortcomings, poor work ethic, even intellectual inferiority. Another important question is whether welfare causes poverty.
I see. Now I do want you banned. :doh
 
Take a number and join the club.

Why?.....:confused:
For providing a link that was demanded?.....:doh
People should not ask questions unless they want straight answers....:shrug:
 
Why?.....:confused:
For providing a link that was demanded?.....:doh
People should not ask questions unless they want straight answers....:shrug:

No. Cause you're a racist troll who never provides any input into any debate. I'm surprised you've lasted this long.
 
I kind of embarassed myself at Disneyland on Friday when my partner tried to squeeze into the tram seat next to me and I said, "Oh hell no, there's no room for you here. Get to the back of the bus, Ms. Parks".

Had no idea there was a black family sitting behind me. I was told they were glaring holes through the back of my head. :lol:

I'd like to know how many minority youths know who Ms. Parks is. They would probably respond she's a character in South Park!! It is tragic that we cannot laugh at each other. We are now a totalitarian society whereby you can be sued for life by making a crack about one's ehtnic background. Yet, in our media we see cracks made every day and we are paying to watch!! We laugh at fat folks, skinny folks, folks that are funny or ugly looking. The foundation of our society is supposed to be based on people that are different. It is what we are;different! Get over this s@#t!!!
 
They like any other groups have little control over the lunatic fringe. When is the last time the Democrats or moderate liberals tried to control code pink or boobs not bombs? Oh never? And yet the same people would yell and scream that they do not represent the majority.

Play the partisan game someplace else.

Uh, make me...you can cease and desist with ordering folks around like you're still in the military. Get off the stage.
 
I'd like to know how many minority youths know who Ms. Parks is. They would probably respond she's a character in South Park!! It is tragic that we cannot laugh at each other. We are now a totalitarian society whereby you can be sued for life by making a crack about one's ehtnic background. Yet, in our media we see cracks made every day and we are paying to watch!! We laugh at fat folks, skinny folks, folks that are funny or ugly looking. The foundation of our society is supposed to be based on people that are different. It is what we are;different! Get over this s@#t!!!

That is its foundation, but not where it is headed.....;)
 
Disprove it if you can, but I grow weary of lazy people who don't feel like doing their own research.....:doh

Here are the statistics on welfare recipients:
Traits of families on AFDC (1)

Race
--------------
White 38.8%
Black 37.2
Hispanic 17.8
Asian 2.8
Other 3.4

Time on AFDC
---------------------------
Less than 7 months 19.0%
7 to 12 months 15.2
One to two years 19.3
Two to five years 26.9
Over five years 19.6

Number of children
-------------------
One 43.2%
Two 30.7
Three 15.8
Four or more 10.3

Age of Mother
------------------
Teenager 7.6%
20 - 29 47.9
30 - 39 32.7
40 or older 11.8

Status of Father 1973 1992
-------------------------------------
Divorced or separated 46.5% 28.6
Deceased 5.0 1.6
Unemployed or Disabled 14.3 9.0
Not married to mother 31.5 55.3
Other or Unknown 2.7 5.5
Notes on teenagers

As the statistics show, teenage mothers comprise a very small part of the welfare population.

And contrary to popular belief, teenage pregnancy has declined in the last several decades. Many are surprised to learn that the height of teenage pregnancy in the U.S. actually occurred in the 1950s - a decade known for its supposed conservative social values. Between 1960 and 1992, the number of births per 1,000 teenagers (aged 15-19) declined from 89 to 61. (2)

However, this was also an era when individual welfare benefits declined. Between 1970 and 1991, the purchasing power of benefits for the typical AFDC family fell 42 percent, primarily as a result of state and federal cuts. (3) Ironically, many conservatives will be surprised to learn that their correlation still stands, even if they thought it was in the other direction.

However, the period from 1946 to 1963 is known as the "Baby Boom," because all childbearing age groups - not just teenagers - were having children at unusually high rates. The teenage birth rate is not the only one that has declined in the decades since.

Furthermore, the socially conservative 50s featured much less sex education, and many sexually active teenagers were ignorant of birth control. The falling teenage birthrates in the last several decades could as well be correlated with better sex education as falling individual welfare payments.

And on that score, we should compare the U.S to Europe, which not only promotes early sex education to a far greater degree, but also has far greater welfare benefits for mothers with dependent children. And the success or failure of these two very different policies can be seen in the following statistics:

Sexually active teenage population: (4)

Norway 66%
United States 65
United Kingdom 57
Germany 56
Canada 53
Italy 34
France 34

Percent who have not had intercourse by age 20:

Boys Girls
Belgium 61 63
Netherlands 58 62
Germany 33 28
Norway 33 25
United Kingdom 24 23
France 9 25
United States 12 16

Percent of sexually active single 15 to 19-year olds using
birth control:


Germany 95%
United Kingdom 92
Netherlands 88
Norway 87
Sweden 79
Denmark 70
United States 56

Teen pregnancies per 1,000 teenagers:


United States 98.0
United Kingdom 46.6
Norway 40.2
Canada 38.6
Finland 32.1
Sweden 28.3
Denmark 27.9
Netherlands 12.1
Japan 10.5

Teenage mothers per 1,000 teenagers

United States 54
United Kingdom 31
Canada 28
France 25
Norway 25
Germany 20
Finland 19
Denmark 16
Switzerland 10
Netherlands 9
Japan 4
Notes on race

Blacks comprise only 12 percent of the nation, but, according to the above figures, they comprise 37 percent of the welfare rolls. This should not be surprising; in 1994, blacks had a poverty rate of 33 percent. We should not, of course, think it unusual to find poor people on welfare. Consequently, discussions of race and welfare must turn on different issues.

The most prevalent question is why there are so many blacks in poverty. Liberals argue that it is the result of continuing racism and discrimination, especially at hiring time. Conservatives have argued a variety of other causes: moral shortcomings, poor work ethic, even intellectual inferiority. Another important question is whether welfare causes poverty.



Return to Overview

Endnotes:

1. Overview of Entitlement Programs, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994).

2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Characteristics and Financial Condition of AFDC Recipients, Fiscal Year 1992 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1992); 1994 Green Book, p. 47.


2) You don't want me to be banned, do you?....:2razz:
I'm beginning to think they brought Aaronssong out of retirement to get rid of me.......:lol:

They? Who, pray tell is "they"??? No one brought me anywhere. I returned of my own volition....holding my nose, as the n-word is bandied about like butter. And why does everything have to be about "you"? Who are you?
 
They? Who, pray tell is "they"??? No one brought me anywhere. I returned of my own volition....holding my nose, as the n-word is bandied about like butter. And why does everything have to be about "you"? Who are you?

Wouldn't the correct question be, "Who dat"?......:rofl
 
Wouldn't the correct question be, "Who dat"?......:rofl

Uh, no. Elitists and snobs never speak in that manner. I think you have me confused with someone else.
 
If that's so, why would you ask me the previous question? I find it and you suspect.
Suspect?.....:confused:
You will need to catch up by reading some old threads (& some not so old) to ascertain the identity of 'they'.........;)
I assure I am not 'suspect', I am very real.......:)
 
They? Who, pray tell is "they"??? No one brought me anywhere. I returned of my own volition....holding my nose, as the n-word is bandied about like butter. And why does everything have to be about "you"? Who are you?

No one here is permitted to use the word "nigger" in any remotely contextual fashion. It is used as example, quote, or out of context entirely, but never as a racial slur without some serious consequences.

Stop lying.
 
They? Who, pray tell is "they"??? No one brought me anywhere. I returned of my own volition....holding my nose, as the n-word is bandied about like butter. And why does everything have to be about "you"? Who are you?




This is a lie. Jallman has corrected you.
 
Uh, make me...you can cease and desist with ordering folks around like you're still in the military. Get off the stage.

So in other words, you got nothing.

Duly noted.

Hyper partisan rhetoric will get you no place here.
 
Last edited:
I wish I had the third party data, but it does not negate my first hand experiences. I believe you agreed with me that the attitude of a "white man's education" does in fact exist among some black communities.

It makes no difference to the point I was making. In debate anecdotal evidence means nothing as anyone can say what ever they want. This is why it is delegated to the realm of opinion and not fact. You need corroborating sources to state anything as fact.

Your experience was wrong in some cases and you made bad generalizations because of it.

Real tangible evidence is the best in debate.

PS: Common sense and reality also play a part in this. I mean we all know the sky appears blue. So this is common knowledge and you would not need evidence to back up that statement.

I'd like to know what kinds of things could be done to combat this damaging attitude.

People taking responsibility for actions as parents. Nothing else will have much of an effect.
 
Last edited:
It makes no difference to the point I was making. In debate anecdotal evidence means nothing as anyone can say what ever they want. This is why it is delegated to the realm of opinion and not fact. You need corroborating sources to state anything as fact.

Your experience was wrong in some cases and you made bad generalizations because of it.

Real tangible evidence is the best in debate.

I don't disagree. This is why I like to have conversations rather than debates. And thereby question and explore my opinions with others.



People taking responsibility for actions as parents. Nothing else will have much of an effect.

This is my feeling as well. Unfortunately, many factors (women's liberation, upscale housing and lifestyle, two income families, high divorce rate, single parent families) conspire to make it harder to have devoted time on behalf of parents, for the children's education.
 
I don't disagree. This is why I like to have conversations rather than debates. And thereby question and explore my opinions with others.

OK.

This is my feeling as well. Unfortunately, many factors (women's liberation, upscale housing and lifestyle, two income families, high divorce rate, single parent families) conspire to make it harder to have devoted time on behalf of parents, for the children's education.

Now in the black community add a high rate of single teenage mothers and deadbeat dads, throw in rampant drug use and wala! A recipe for disaster.
 
No one here is permitted to use the word "nigger" in any remotely contextual fashion. It is used as example, quote, or out of context entirely, but never as a racial slur without some serious consequences.

Stop lying.

Sez you. You and others, seemingly favor the word more than any other.
It should never be used as an example, quote or in any context. It is reprehensible...and a reflection of the baseness of the forum members who use it.
 
This is a lie. Jallman has corrected you.

I am not a liar. I call you out. You as a moderator should set an example. That you don't, speaks volumes. This is a racist forum. Period.
You gonna issue me an infraction for telling the truth?
 
Back
Top Bottom