You refuse to go point for point and you have the gall to call me dishonest? Take a good look in the mirror Redress.
Ah the last refuge of the defeated. And of course you can't even quote what you claim I "took out of context"
Your dishonesty really knows no bounds does it?
Proclaiming victory without even addressing the specific points is a sure sign of defeat.
While you duck going point for point like a real debator.
Wrong. Once again I point to your own post:
So which is it Redress? Which face am I addressing again?
Once of those being MARRIED to another woman according to YOUR OWN POST.
Once again I must embarass you and look at the law behind this:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex.
US CODE: Title 10,654. Policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces
How are you going to try wiggle out of it this time?
Just in case you missed it for the 5th time, it states:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex
And once more:
That the member has married or attempted to marry a person known to be of the same biological sex
Are you done now? Or are you going to continue to pretend that you haven't said it despite me quoting you and now being confronted by yet another source informing you once again how painfully wrong you are.
US CODE: Title 10,654. Policy concerning homosexuality in the armed forces
This truly is like watching a sinking ship with the captain still claiming nothing is wrong. Its painful and amusing to watch at the same time.