• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lesbian teen back at Miss. school after prom flap

Why would I want to do that? I believe in free speech. Just don't think that you have the right to force me to live by your views. That's all. Very simple.
You have your opinion. I have mine. We respect each others views and allow each other to live accordingly.

The problem is...the bigots and homophobes aren't content with that.

I have no intention of respecting any view I disagree with. If I think you're wrong then indeed there's nothing to respect.

If I held the live and let live mentality then I wouldn't be on this forum.
 
She did work to avoid breaking the rules. Kinda admirable actually.

She still has every intention on braking the rules of dress. She wants to bring her girl friend, that's fine, but they are both to show up as ladies.
 
She still has every intention on braking the rules of dress. She wants to bring her girl friend, that's fine, but they are both to show up as ladies.

She did not intend to break any rules, hence her asking for a rule change.

By the way, dress does not determine whether some one is a lady.
 
She still has every intention on braking the rules of dress. She wants to bring her girl friend, that's fine, but they are both to show up as ladies.

I don't think it's appropriate for public schools to differentiate by gender when it comes to dress code.
And yes, if this means banning skirts and dresses because they can't stomach seeing males wearing them to school (although I seriously doubt this would be a widespread issue) then by all means do so.

There should be a student dress code, the end.
Not separate policies for males and females.

Schools do not have the right to demand that female students be- or dress like- "ladies".
They are young women, and Constance McMillen would still be a young woman, whether she showed up to the dance in pants or a dress (or a panda bear costume, for that matter).
 
Last edited:
Although I don't support the homosexual agenda, I think that canceling a prom because of a lesbian couple is too extreme. The school made the wrong decision.

Can you tell me what the gay agenda is?
 
Why would I want to do that? I believe in free speech. Just don't think that you have the right to force me to live by your views. That's all. Very simple.
You have your opinion. I have mine. We respect each others views and allow each other to live accordingly.

The problem is...the bigots and homophobes aren't content with that.

Not really or that miss america lady would not have been crucified for stating her personal opinion.

Gay marriage would be a non-issue because anyone of age can currently stand in front of their familiy and friends and declare their devotion and essentially be married.

This is about taking your own views and forcing it upon others.

You cannot have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
Can you tell me what the gay agenda is?

You asked for it.

The Gay Agenda


6:00 am Gym
8:00 am Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)
9:00 am Hair appointment
10:00 am Shopping
12:00 PM Brunch

2:00 PM
1) Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and Local Governments as well as all other national governments
2) Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle
3) Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages
4) Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian and Jamaican drug cartels
5) Establish planetary chain of homo breeding gulags where over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially impregnated baby factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay leadership
6) bulldoze all houses of worship, and
7) Secure total control of the INTERNET and all mass media for the exclusive use of child pornographers.

2:30 PM Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from stress of world conquest
4:00 PM Cocktails
6:00 PM Light Dinner (soup, salad, Chardonnay)
8:00 PM Theater
11:00 PM Bed (du jour)
 
Last edited:
You asked for it.

The Gay Agenda


6:00 am Gym
8:00 am Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)
9:00 am Hair appointment
10:00 am Shopping
12:00 PM Brunch

2:00 PM
1) Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and Local Governments as well as all other national governments
2) Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle
3) Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages
4) Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian and Jamaican drug cartels
5) Establish planetary chain of homo breeding gulags where over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially impregnated baby factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay leadership
6) bulldoze all houses of worship, and
7) Secure total control of the INTERNET and all mass media for the exclusive use of child pornographers.

2:30 PM Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from stress of world conquest
4:00 PM Cocktails
6:00 PM Light Dinner (soup, salad, with Chardonnay)
8:00 PM Theater
11:00 PM Bed (du jour)

Und you vill accept everyone regardless of your personal beliefs! If you do not ve have veys of making your tolerant....

614_image_02.jpg
 
Can you tell me what the gay agenda is?

The gay activist agenda is simple. They want their lifestyle to be equal to heterosexuality and accepted as such.
 
She did not intend to break any rules, hence her asking for a rule change.

By the way, dress does not determine whether some one is a lady.

You're right, that would be the school's code of conduct. Did she ask for a rules change there also?
 
The gay activist agenda is simple. They want their lifestyle to be equal to heterosexuality and accepted as such.

And the straight agenda, I presume, is to prevent this and to ensure that gays remain second-class citizens in the eyes of the law.

You know, I think I like the gay agenda better.
 
And the straight agenda, I presume, is to prevent this and to ensure that gays remain second-class citizens in the eyes of the law.

You know, I think I like the gay agenda better.

How exactly are gays second class citizens?

Can you explain that crap or is this just fun to throw out?
 
How exactly are gays second class citizens?

Can you explain that crap or is this just fun to throw out?

They're not allowed to marry the one they love.
They are denied the protections that heterosexuals enjoy as a result of their right to marry, specifically health care coverage, adoption, step-parenting rights, and end of life choices.
 
They're not allowed to marry the one they love.
They are denied the protections that heterosexuals enjoy as a result of their right to marry, specifically health care coverage, adoption, step-parenting rights, and end of life choices.

BS. They can go out and get married right now. There are plenty of churches that will marry homosexuals.

I support civil unions for the rest but not marriage.
 
BS. They can go out and get married right now. There are plenty of churches that will marry homosexuals.

I support civil unions for the rest but not marriage.

Gay marriage is legal in only a handful of states.
They are denied the right to travel or relocate within the US, because states which forbid same-sex marriage do not recognize their unions when it comes to legal issues.
 
Gay marriage is legal in only a handful of states.
They are denied the right to travel or relocate within the US, because states which forbid same-sex marriage do not recognize their unions when it comes to legal issues.

So if all states recognized civil unions you would be satisfied?
 
The gay activist agenda is simple. They want their lifestyle to be equal to heterosexuality and accepted as such.

And why is that a problem for you?

More specifically, why do you feel your lifestyle is above that of homosexuals?
 
So if all states recognized civil unions you would be satisfied?

I'd be more satisfied than I am now.
I still consider it a form of apartheid; a second-rate status.
Why not just let them marry and get it over with.
You know it's coming. We all know that.
Within our lifetimes, unless we die next week.
Why stand in the way?
Imagine how you would feel, if someone were throwing up all sorts of obstacles in your path this way.
 
Last edited:
Gay marriage is legal in only a handful of states.
They are denied the right to travel or relocate within the US, because states which forbid same-sex marriage do not recognize their unions when it comes to legal issues.

So they are not denied the right to travel or relocate anywhere they choose?


CNN is pumping the gay agenda for about 6 hours now straight..so to speak.

Trapped at work..cant ...get away....send help...or a remote to change the channel.
 
Last edited:
So they are not denied the right to travel or relocate anywhere they choose?


.


No, not as a married couple.
You wouldn't travel either, if your marriage was not recognized in other states.
Suppose you got in a car accident in Mississippi, and your wife was terminally injured and placed on life support, and you weren't even allowed to see her in the ICU, let alone participate in end of life choices.

When you have children together, it becomes even more complicated than that.
 
And why is that a problem for you?

More specifically, why do you feel your lifestyle is above that of homosexuals?

For one it has been the basis for the family unit since this country and dozens of other countries have used for thousands of years.

It is genetic. I can prove quite easily that heterosexual sex is the foundation for procreation.

Homosexuality has never been proven to be genetic and therefore can never be elevated to the heterosexual level.

There are many alternative lifestyles out there and not one has been proven to be genetic ergo the label "alternative" lifestyles.

Why do you feel (and it is feel since you have no factual basis) that this one alternative lifestyle should be equal to heterosexuality?
 
But you wouldn't be completely satisfied.

And that is where we differ.

A few militant gays and a nunch of "Feel Good" Liberals will not be satisfied until we accept the gay lifestyle as a suitable alternate life style and that will never happen,,It has very little to do with gay marriage.......That is just a ruise..
 
A few militant gays and a nunch of "Feel Good" Liberals will not be satisfied until we accept the gay lifestyle as a suitable alternate life style and that will never happen,,It has very little to do with gay marriage.......That is just a ruise..

You sure seem to have a lot of, ah, insider information about the Gay Agenda there, Navy.

:roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom