• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lesbian teen back at Miss. school after prom flap

Dr_Patrick said:
How exactly would they force you? :roll:
Click to expand...

They have their ways.




clockwork_big.jpg
 
Navy Pride said:
Well at least you said something this time even if your wrong.....Your a rookie in DP or you would know why I am against gay marriage.........
Click to expand...


Please Navy. Please tell me what gives you or others the right to legislate morality. Even if we do accept the tyranny of the majority, why do you have the position against abortion that you do? A majority Americans support Roe v Wade. Why don't you want to listen to the people there?

Poll: Most Americans Support Roe vs. Wade - Associated Content - associatedcontent.com
 
Navy Pride said:
No comparison at all completely different situation to compare what a race of people went through,,,,Come up with some new talking points.......Yours are old and stale..........
Click to expand...

No, it's exactly the same. People don't choose to be gay or black, and bigots do everything they can to discriminate against them.

And, just to let you know, "Nuh uh it isn't" generally is not considered a winning strategy in debate. If you disagree with my statement, explain why. And try not to base your answer on religious doctrine from 2000 years ago or discredited science.
 
It should be against the law, like an indecent exposure.......;)
 
Partisan said:
Exposing me to it is forcing it on me.....;)
Click to expand...

To a MUCH smaller degree than you are forcing your bigotry upon the rest of us.


Don't worry, though. I would never lobby to outlaw you.
 
Gardener said:
To a MUCH smaller degree than you are forcing your bigotry upon the rest of us.


Don't worry, though. I would never lobby to outlaw you.
Click to expand...

So, you are for indecent exposure in public?.....;)
 
Partisan said:
Exposing me to it is forcing it on me.....;)
Click to expand...

Heterosexuals "force" their ways EVERYDAY on you by public marriages, kissing and holding hands in public, holding each other. I guess you are all against that as well, or are you just against homosexuals doing that?
 
Dr_Patrick said:
Just like heterosexuals constantly flaunt their lifestyle in everyone's face every single day in society via movies, television, music, etc.? :roll:
Click to expand...

Here's a hint: Heterosexuality is a proven genetic trait. It even explains why you are here :rofl
 
texmaster said:
Here's a hint: Heterosexuality is a proven genetic trait. It even explains why you are here :rofl
Click to expand...

Prove that heterosexuality is genetic. Not this "heterosexual sex leads to reproduction crap", which is not proof that heterosexuality is genetic. I know you don't like to actually prove things, but this one is going to need it.
 
Redress said:
And we have our obligatory Hitler reference, by the same guy who brought up pedophilia in this thread. Somehow not surprising...
Click to expand...

Nice ducking on the argument again Redress.

My belief that lesbians should be allowed to go to prom is in the minority? You can prove this? Or my more general belief that gay people are just people? Again, can you prove that? Bet you won't, since you never do prove your claims.
Click to expand...

Well let's see. Where in the article does it show a majority of students have rallied to her cause?

Go ahead, show us.

0-31 Redress. I know its a hard pill to swallow but welcome to reality.
 
texmaster said:
Nice ducking on the argument again Redress.



Well let's see. Where in the article does it show a majority of students have rallied to her cause?

Go ahead, show us.

0-31 Redress. I know its a hard pill to swallow but welcome to reality.
Click to expand...

So you are not going to prove your comments. Surprise surprise.
 
Redress said:
Prove that heterosexuality is genetic. Not this "heterosexual sex leads to reproduction crap", which is not proof that heterosexuality is genetic. I know you don't like to actually prove things, but this one is going to need it.
Click to expand...

How do we procreate Redress? Is it man and man, woman and woman or man and woman?

My God how pathetic is it for you to pretend sex ed 101 never existed?


Yeah Redress! That stupid thing that allows our species and MILLIONS of other species on our planet procreate is really an inconvenient truth for you isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Redress said:
So you are not going to prove your comments. Surprise surprise.
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting for you to prove my original question to you which you ducked. Prove homosexuality is genetic.

Here's a hint: claiming it existed in time doesn't count. So have cannibals :rofl
 
texmaster said:
How do we procreate Redress? Is it man and man, woman and woman or man and woman?

My God how pathetic is it for you to pretend sex ed 101 never existed?
Click to expand...

That does not prove that heterosexuality is genetic. It proves that heterosexual sex leads to procreation. To prove that heterosexuality is actually genetic, you need to do something more. Now, just once, prove a comment you make, with sources.
 
texmaster said:
Prove homosexuality is genetic.
Click to expand...

Prove that it isn't genetic.

Thousands of years ago, they couldn't prove that the Earth revolved around the Sun, but that didn't change the fact that it did.

Unless you can prove that homosexuality is NOT genetic, you cannot say that for certain that it isn't. Nor does your procreation claim validate that heterosexuality is genetic.
 
texmaster said:
I'm still waiting for you to prove my original question to you which you ducked. Prove homosexuality is genetic.

Here's a hint: claiming it existed in time doesn't count. So have cannibals :rofl
Click to expand...

I never claimed homosexuality is genetic. I claim, rightly, that why people have the orientation is not entirely known. Now, you want to, just once, back up one of your claims instead of deflecting and building straw men?
 
Redress said:
That does not prove that heterosexuality is genetic. It proves that heterosexual sex leads to procreation. To prove that heterosexuality is actually genetic, you need to do something more. Now, just once, prove a comment you make, with sources.
Click to expand...

Oh Redress, you are beyond hope if you can't even admit that heterosexuality is required to propagate the species and millions of other species on this planet.


You've gone off the deep end my friend.
 
TheNextEra said:
Prove that it isn't genetic.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to change the law, you are. The burden is on you.

Thousands of years ago, they couldn't prove that the Earth revolved around the Sun, but that didn't change the fact that it did.

Unless you can prove that homosexuality is NOT genetic, you cannot say that for certain that it isn't. Nor does your procreation claim validate that heterosexuality is genetic.
Click to expand...

Sorry, it doesn't work that way. You want to change the law, you must support your position to change it. You can't yet you want everyone else to be forced to accept your opinion in law.
 
Genetic or not, how does that affect the morality of homosexuality?
 
texmaster said:
I'm not trying to change the law, you are. The burden is on you.
Click to expand...

But you are saying for certain it isn't genetic. That is an absolute and as such you have to prove that. You have also claimed that heterosexuality is genetic, and it is up to you to prove that as well. You just put the ball in your court kiddo.

texmaster said:
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. You want to change the law, you must support your position to change it. You can't yet you want everyone else to be forced to accept your opinion in law.
Click to expand...

Genetics is not required to be proven for anti-discrimination laws towards gays to be put into effect.
 
texmaster said:
Oh Redress, you are beyond hope if you can't even admit that heterosexuality is required to propagate the species and millions of other species on this planet.


You've gone off the deep end my friend.
Click to expand...

Ok, once again you duck and avoid proving your claims. I will demolish your argument with one simple fact. Gay people can have kids. In my family, 4 people are direct descendants(within 2 generations, ie kids and grandkids) of a gay person. Heterosexuality is not required for procreation, only heterosexual sex. Orientation only determines preference.

So, once again, prove your claims, and how about using an actual source.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom