- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 36,913
- Reaction score
- 11,283
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
By that logic pedophilia would be legal if a child agrees to it.
FAIL. Children cannot consent under the law.
By that logic pedophilia would be legal if a child agrees to it.
Sorry. She involved the ACLU to force the school to change the rules. That isn't following the rules, thats trying to circumvent them.
By that logic pedophilia would be legal if a child agrees to it.
It's supported by as much evidence as your claim that being gay is a choice.
Say she wasn't gay, did not have a date for prom, and wanted to go with another girl so that both girls could attend a significant high school event.
Would you still have the same objections?
Not only is she being discriminated against because she's gay, she's being treated with gender bias. There is no good reason that a girl can't wear a tux to prom as long as the clothing is suitable and doesn't violate normal on-campus clothing restrictions.
What this thread needs is an irrational appeal to emotion that has nothing to do with the actual topic.
Oh look, here we go, right there. Thanks for supplying that.
By that logic pedophilia would be legal if a child agrees to it.
Don't children make decisions on friends, what to wear, what to eat? Who are you to decide arbitrarily that they cannot think for themselves?
This is where the argument falls apart because there is always a sexual practice you will want to ban based on morality which is why using the argument you are making is so hypocritical.
Sorry. She involved the ACLU to force the school to change the rules. That isn't following the rules, thats trying to circumvent them.
Tex, I'd respect you so much more if you just said, "I hate fags, I hate dykes and anything that anyone does to f**k them up is okay by me."
Okay, scatch the bit about respect, but at least it's be honest.
By that logic pedophilia would be legal if a child agrees to it.
Don't children make decisions on friends, what to wear, what to eat? Who are you to decide arbitrarily that they cannot think for themselves?
This is where the argument falls apart because there is always a sexual practice you will want to ban based on morality which is why using the argument you are making is so hypocritical.
Sorry. She involved the ACLU to force the school to change the rules. That isn't following the rules, thats trying to circumvent them.
But I don't hate them at all. Your conclusion fails.
But I don't hate them at all. Your conclusion fails.
What this thread needs is an irrational appeal to emotion that has nothing to do with the actual topic.
Oh look, here we go, right there. Thanks for supplying that.
When you can't debate the point, make fun of it and run away. That ensures you are always right.
You did not make a point. Being gay is not being a pedophile. Bringing it up is just an appeal to emotion.
Nope, because under the law Children do not have the right to determine such a thing.
Actually, no. Children make all those decisions under the assumed legal permission of their parents. For example if you decided to go to a party with a group of friends and are under 18 and you're not allowed theoritically the parent could have the police take you back home. Why? Because technically you DON'T get to make those decisions under the law.
Actually, it isn't where the law falls apart. Not for people that actually are viewing this objectively and actually exercising intellectual honesty instead of being extreme hyper partisan hacks like yourself who instead come to a conclusion and then manipulate, exaggerate, or flat out ignore information to then back up the conclusion you already came to.
Your pedophilia reasoning doesn't work under the law, because children do not have the legal authority to make such decisions.
No, that IS following the rules. To "Break the rules" which you REPEATEDLY accuse her of doing...wrongfully and seemingly willfully dishonestly...one would actually have had to BREAK them. She's broken no rules, instead she sought to try and change said rules. There is nothing wrong, illegal, or rule breaking about that.
You did not make a point. Being gay is not being a pedophile. Bringing it up is just an appeal to emotion.
Ooh, now we're getting somewhere. So, what do you most like about them?
Well its been fun kids but 4 pages is enough
Thats a belief not evidence.
No, bringing it up goes beyond that. Bringing it up is just a dishonest red herring thrown out there in an attempt vilify one's opponents in a thinly veiled way.
It is hackmanship at its finest.
You want to continue your epic fail and ignore that I fully support civil unions?
Its your choice but your idiocy and ignorance isn't helping you.
I never said being gay is being a pedophile. Another baseless lie by you.
So you have nothing to back up your claim. Not a shocker at all. There's a 4 year old in the back asking to go "pee"
As I quoted from the article:
And neither you nor they can cite any "rights" within the law that support her in any way shape or form at a state or federal level. At least you are consistent.
Then where is the law? Show it to us. If they could quote it, they would have.
Until you can cite the law that gives her these "rights" you don't have a leg to stand on.
hahaha I see I can't rely on you to follow the logic if she got the ACLU involved she had every intention of breaking the rules.
Where does it say that? You aren't citing a law are you?
Isn't she under 18? So by your own claim how could she decide for herself she is a lesbian?
I know you are frustrated but claiming evidence based on your own personal conclusions of an argument isn't evidence. Stick to citing the law that supports you.
Isn't she trying to change the rules the school put forth? Why is one rule more sacred to you than another. Oh thats right. Personal preference
As I've said multiple times and directly to you, she had every intention of breaking the law or she never would have asked the ACLU to try and circumvent it.