• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2 Generals Wary About Repealing Gay Policy

Hey, either you obeyed the rules of service, or you didn't and you are a hypocrite. But I like to assume the best of people and that you just lived a boring life. :mrgreen:

What part of its none of your ****ing business what I did?
 
If they do that its probably in a hotel or in private so they are hard to catch unlike gays who get into 100 man daisy chains in bath houses in the Peoples Republic of San Francisco or Seattle......

Nice to hear you have a fascination with daisy chains NP. Better be careful or you might get discharged.
 
If they do that its probably in a hotel or in private so they are hard to catch unlike gays who get into 100 man daisy chains in bath houses in the Peoples Republic of San Francisco or Seattle......

WOW you have quite an imagination:lol:
 
Nice to hear you have a fascination with daisy chains NP. Better be careful or you might get discharged.

I am just telling you how gays were catching AIDS by the thousands in the eighties and are doing it again....Since you flaunt your sexuality like that or in those obnoxious disgusting parades its hard to not know about them//////
 
I don't deny it and they have caused thousands of deaths....

Well if gays are so great at killing people, maybe you should them serve in the military so that they can get to work on our enemies.

Not everyone can be a Nun like you who didn't do anything to break the rules of enlistment.
 
Guess you never heard of that huh........They shut them down in the eighties but they are back now........

Really? You have lots of experiences with daisy chains NP? Seen one or two yourself maybe?
 
Well if gays are so great at killing people, maybe you should them serve in the military so that they can get to work on our enemies.

Not everyone can be a Nun like you who didn't do anything to break the rules of enlistment.

Lets just say when I retired I had 5 gold hasmarks on my left sleeve and that means perfect conduct for the 21 years I served......
 
Lets just say when I retired I had 5 gold hasmarks on my left sleeve and that means perfect conduct for the 21 years I served......

Good to hear you are so good at not getting caugh...er into trouble.
 
No but being gay I am sure you do and worse.......:rofl

Me? I'm celibate. I believe in saving yourself for marriage.

Did you save yourself for marriage? I assume you did, otherwise all that vaginal only sex would probably get boring after awhile.
 
Bottom line is DADT is a long way from being overturned thank God.........:applaud
 
Me? I'm celibate. I believe in saving yourself for marriage.

Did you save yourself for marriage? I assume you did, otherwise all that vaginal only sex would probably get boring after awhile.

Your bound and determine to find out about my sex life my left wing friend.......it ain't gonna happen............Is that how you get your jollies?????
 
Your bound and determine to find out about my sex life my left wing friend.......it ain't gonna happen............

I already know about your sex life. Unless you are a hypocrite, you were a Nun. Either it is one or the other. It doesn't matter to me. :mrgreen:
 
Bottom line is DADT is a long way from being overturned thank God.........:applaud

It is a million miles closer to being turned over than it was even as recently as a couple of years ago.
 
So let's do the count...

We have one military leader in support of lifting the ban.

Two generals who are wary of doing it quickly but who express no explicit concern about doing it.

And one general opposed to doing so.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Folks, this is not the thread to postulate about any member's sex lives. Discuss the topic.
 
Im just curious...are you a deliberate idiot...or does it come natural to you? Do you refuse to accept that in a male dominated, testosterone driven environment where anger, and violence is a commonplace occurence that a fairly large number of soldiers might not be...lets just say eager...to take orders from a flamboyantly gay individual?

Im not here to ARGUE with you the merits. I DONT CARE if you agree or disagree...we wont be making policy changes. Im pointing out the problems. If you continue to stick your head in the...sand...well...fine...

Not being able to follow the orders from a flamboyantly gay officer is a disciplinary problem from the ones not following the orders. The origination of the problem does NOT come from the gay officer, but from those who cannot get past their homophobia, or macho man superiority complex.

If this is the problem that you're pointing out, explain to me how it is a problem that you attribute to gays? It seems to me the problem should be attributed to those who can't follow the chain of command.

Is this really your point?

And before you go on and write your response, please filter your ad homs out of your posts. I don't appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Like I said if you don't like the rules don't enlist....But if you do enlist obey the rules....

There's a difference between not liking the rules and not obeying them. And I don't remember any part of any contract I signed for the Navy saying that I couldn't complain about the rules, as long as I was not officially representing the Navy or DOD.

Now I'm not gay, but I certainly could have been brought up on charges a couple of times if I would have been caught. The problem is this particular rule makes it wrong for someone else to do the exact thing that I did while I was in by just routing my chit, marry the person I love. There are other things, but that's a major one. It's not fair, and it needs to change. If any group of people are being catered to in the DADT issue, it's those that are opposed to repealing it, not gays. Gays aren't asking for special privilege, they're asking for something that we have, the right to be in the military and still be able to date, kiss, hold hands with, dance with, and marry someone they are attracted to while on their own time without fearing discharge for doing any of these things that heterosexuals can and do do in the military all the time. Many of the things mentioned above are even authorized on base and in uniform for heterosexuals, although some require special occasions.
 
Unless society is ready to face the fact that being a homosexual is nothing more that a life style choice and goes against nature

:roll::roll::roll:

Yeah yeah yeah. Come up with some new material, we've heard this act already.
 
Im just curious...are you a deliberate idiot...or does it come natural to you? Do you refuse to accept that in a male dominated, testosterone driven environment where anger, and violence is a commonplace occurence that a fairly large number of soldiers might not be...lets just say eager...to take orders from a flamboyantly gay individual?

Uh, did it ever occur to you that a fairly large number of soldiers might not be eager to take orders from ANYONE?

Yet they do.

And like so many objections to gay soldiers, this one was used against letting blacks in the military too. After all, can you imagine a bunch of racist white boys taking orders from a negro? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Me? I'm celibate. I believe in saving yourself for marriage.

Did you save yourself for marriage? I assume you did, otherwise all that vaginal only sex would probably get boring after awhile.

Hey professor critical thought...I want you to close your eyes...think loving thoughts about your mom...your grandma...and then think what wonderful ways they liked to 'take it'...I mean...other than vaginally...because OF COURSE they must have. They wouldnt have been 'normal' otherwise...right?
 
Back
Top Bottom