• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

As I said before... Nice equivocation. Nothing changes.

Your continued equivocations and attempts to get out of having to prove your claims -- just as I predicted -- serve only illustrate your eagerness to self-sodomoze your credibility as a sentient being.

Oh, and regarding this little bit of petulance:

One of two things is true:
-This is a lie
-I'm not a child
Your call.

I've now switched focus towards convincing you to have a general debate on the macro economy given the global financial system's composition in the last 8 years. Up for it? Or would you rather argue sentence structure?
 
I've now switched focus....
Rather than continue to avoid the point, why don't you man up and admit that you made a claim that you know you cannot support?
 
Last edited:
Rather than continue to avoid the point, why don't you man up and admit that you made a claim that you know you cannot support?

I did confirm that i made a claim that was impossible to support. We call those opinions. You should know!

With that aside, are you interested in a debate concerning the macro economy in the absence of various stabilization policies enacted since q4 2008? Petty squabbles regarding sentence structure and meaning do not interest me.

If you are afraid, you may decline. :2wave:
 
YOU called it a fact.
Man up.

Didn't call "think 1930's" a fact. You took it as one in an attempt to argue with me without having to provide sound analysis of the economy.

Why are you afraid to debate me in this subject, yet have all the nerve in the world to argue my sentence structure?
 
YOU called it a fact.
Man up.

He has, he said it was an opinion, like 10 times now.

Here is something interesting:

CaseShillerDecComposite.jpg


House prices have began to recover. Look at when that started to happen. About the time massive government intervention began in the housing market.
 
He has, he said it was an opinion, like 10 times now.
But it wasnt -- he stated it was a fact -- "the fact remains..."

House prices have began to recover. Look at when that started to happen. About the time massive government intervention began in the housing market.
Can you show causation?
 
But it wasnt -- he stated it was a fact -- "the fact remains..."

it would have been much worse. (we refer to that thing at the end of a sentence as a period) followed by my opinion.

Can you show causation?

Are you afraid to have a debate on the subject?
 
it would have been much worse. (we refer to that thing at the end of a sentence as a period) followed by my opinion.
This is a lie.
Still waiting for you to man up.
(Note that I am sure you never will)
 
Back
Top Bottom