• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Outspoken gay activist called back to active Army duty

Because at the end of the day, we're real men.

Oh, prey tell what makes a gay man any less of a "real" man than a heterosexual man?

I was just making light, but it seems you want to pick a fight. I didn't realize real men attempt to insult anonymous strangers they meet on the internet.
 
Oh, prey tell what makes a gay man any less of a "real" man than a heterosexual man?

I was just making light, but it seems you want to pick a fight. I didn't realize real men attempt to insult anonymous strangers they meet on the internet.

Oh pray tell what makes a straight man have less drive than a gay man?

See, that's typically where you Librulz go wrong. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.
 
Oh pray tell what makes a straight man have less drive than a gay man?

See, that's typically where you Librulz go wrong. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

You aren't giving it. You are creating and knocking down strawmen. Congratz, a two year old with a modem could do that.
 
Oh pray tell what makes a straight man have less drive than a gay man?

It was a joke. Gay men work out more to attract gay guys, yadda, yadda.

See, that's typically where you Librulz go wrong. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

That is where you typical Cons go wrong, you take a joke seriously and then get all pissy.
 
It was a joke. Gay men work out more to attract gay guys, yadda, yadda.



That is where you typical Cons go wrong, you take a joke seriously and then get all pissy.

So, you'll be cool with a few jokes knocking gays? Choose your answer wisely. How about some nigger jokes? I mean, hey, it's just a joke. No need to take it seriously. Right?

Liberals always present a double standard.
 
You aren't giving it. You are creating and knocking down strawmen. Congratz, a two year old with a modem could do that.

Of course you're going to say that. You're a Liberal.
 
So, you'll be cool with a few jokes knocking gays? Choose your answer wisely. How about some nigger jokes? I mean, hey, it's just a joke. No need to take it seriously. Right?

I am gay. I don't care if a black man makes nigger jokes. For that matter, I don't care if a Christian makes Christian jokes, or if a Jew makes Jew jokes. I don't care if a white man makes Honky jokes. So there isn't a double standard since it applies to everyone. You can make jokes about the group you belong to but you are being an ass when you make jokes about people in other groups.

Liberals always present a double standard.

Generalize much?
 
I am gay. I don't care if a black man makes nigger jokes. For that matter, I don't care if a Christian makes Christian jokes, or if a Jew makes Jew jokes. I don't care if a white man makes Honky jokes. So there isn't a double standard since it applies to everyone. You can make jokes about the group you belong to but you are being an ass when you make jokes about people in other groups.

So, if a white formite posted a nigger joke, you would be cool with it? How about if a straight formite posted a fag joke? Still cool?? It's just a joke, after all. Right?

All I was doing was making a joke, in response to your joke, but look what happened.
 
Your ignorance of what defines civil rights is only equalled by your ignorance of the history of their denial.

This is as poor a post as you've ever managed, Bikeman, and you've had some doozies...

Homosexuality has been labeled a felony crime in the past, existing "Sodomy Laws" which prohibit oral and anal sexual intercourse, even between consenting adults, were primarily used to target homosexuals, the government denies openly gays employment to federal institutions like the military, one of the nation's largest employers.

Are you here to discuss this topic or to attack me?
 
So, if a white formite posted a nigger joke, you would be cool with it? How about if a straight formite posted a fag joke? Still cool?? It's just a joke, after all. Right?

What the hell is a "formite"? My answer is still no to both. Go back and read what I said.

All I was doing was making a joke, in response to your joke, but look what happened.

Bull****. You weren't trying to make a joke, you were trying to be insulting. Where is the joke in arguing that the only real men are heterosexual men? I was making light of the stereotype that gay men work out and are in considerably better shape than heterosexual men.

Why are you so condescending? Were you not hugged as a child?
 
There's always room at the front for more gays.

You don't want them behind you.
 
If that's the case why did the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy originate with the Clinton adminstration?

It didn't. Read DoD Dir. 1332.14. It simply got the name DADT under Clinton. Homosexuality has been explicitly banned from the military since 1982. Guess who was President then?
 
Last edited:
Your ignorance of what defines civil rights is only equalled by your ignorance of the history of their denial.

Please define civil rights and the history of denial. Frankly, you could have previously written your views here and showed me where I was wrong, but you chose the insulting approach, not a very effective way to debate.

This is as poor a post as you've ever managed, Bikeman, and you've had some doozies...

Another example of an ineffective debating technique.

Please give examples with links of my doozies.

Homosexuality has been labeled a felony crime in the past, existing "Sodomy Laws" which prohibit oral and anal sexual intercourse, even between consenting adults, were primarily used to target homosexuals, the government denies openly gays employment to federal institutions like the military, one of the nation's largest employers.

Here's some simple laws of man, which were inspired by God. God made man with a penis and woman with a vagina with the idea of using these tools in procreation. God made man desirous of women and the use of these tools pleasant so man and woman would continue to use these tools for creation of life. God did not make the anus for sexual intercourse. It was made for a means to evacuate the body of solid waste matter. For that reason, God did not make it pleasant to insert objects into the anal cavity. Therefore, if it was not pleasant, man and woman would not do it. Every tool had its purpose. Vagina to vagina didn't work. Penis to Penis didn't work. Penis in vagina is against God's laws, therefore deviant behavior.

Look around you. You plug in your computer into the wall socket. The power cord is male. The wall socket is female. Male to male and female to female doesn't turn on your computer so therefore, your computer doesn't compute.

Think of the creation story, if God had wanted men to be gay, he would have made two Adams in the Garden of Eden, but he didn't, did he? He made Eve. Have you ever wondered where the term sodomy originated? It's out of the Bible. It was a city that God destroyed because the same people you seem to think, are normal, were practicing these same acts in this city.
 
Please define civil rights and the history of denial. Frankly, you could have previously written your views here and showed me where I was wrong, but you chose the insulting approach, not a very effective way to debate.



Another example of an ineffective debating technique.

Please give examples with links of my doozies.



Here's some simple laws of man, which were inspired by God. God made man with a penis and woman with a vagina with the idea of using these tools in procreation. God made man desirous of women and the use of these tools pleasant so man and woman would continue to use these tools for creation of life. God did not make the anus for sexual intercourse. It was made for a means to evacuate the body of solid waste matter. For that reason, God did not make it pleasant to insert objects into the anal cavity. Therefore, if it was not pleasant, man and woman would not do it. Every tool had its purpose. Vagina to vagina didn't work. Penis to Penis didn't work. Penis in vagina is against God's laws, therefore deviant behavior.

Look around you. You plug in your computer into the wall socket. The power cord is male. The wall socket is female. Male to male and female to female doesn't turn on your computer so therefore, your computer doesn't compute.

Think of the creation story, if God had wanted men to be gay, he would have made two Adams in the Garden of Eden, but he didn't, did he? He made Eve. Have you ever wondered where the term sodomy originated? It's out of the Bible. It was a city that God destroyed because the same people you seem to think, are normal, were practicing these same acts in this city.

This ridiculous post presumes an awful lot.

In order for your argument to succeed, sex would only be to procreate. If men and women have sex for any other reason, it defeats your entire point.
Men and Women must never have oral sex or anal sex. If they do, that defeats your entire argument and your point fails.
By this argument, it would be a sin to masturbate. Do you believe that masturbation is a sin? If so, there are an awful lot of sinners doing an awful lot of sinning.
and this doesn't even mention birth control. That would be a sin as well. Do you believe birth control is a sin?
 
It didn't. Read DoD Dir. 1332.14. It simply got the name DADT under Clinton. Homosexuality has been explicitly banned from the military since 1982. Guess who was President then?

Homosexuals were banned from the military before 1982. Ronald Reagan didn't address the matter. It was military policy. Why should he?

I know. It's all a vast right-winged conspiracy, but look at the following:

The leading House Democrat on military policy said Friday that he opposes repealing the law that bans openly gay people from serving in the military.

Seventeen years ago, Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) played a major role in crafting the controversial law known as "Don't ask, don't tell." When President Bill Clinton wanted to lift the ban preventing gay people from joining the military, Skelton opposed the move. The end result was a compromise under which gay service members would conceal their sexual orientation.

Skelton opposes repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' - TheHill.com

How do you explain a Democrat being against this policy, or for that matter coming up with the idea in the first place?
 
Its the truth. The radical right-wing has tried to keep the best people out of the military because of their fears that if gays are allowed in the military, people might be more accepting of them in other areas such as marriage.

If you care about this Country, you want the best people in the best positions.
The right-wing doesn't care about that, they only care about advancing their right-wing anti-gay social agenda and they are willing to sacrifice the security interests of this country to do it.
Radical right-wing??? Pulleaze, how long has the policy of no gays in the military been around? Hmmmm?
 
Homosexuals were banned from the military before 1982. Ronald Reagan didn't address the matter. It was military policy. Why should he?

I know. It's all a vast right-winged conspiracy, but look at the following:



Skelton opposes repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' - TheHill.com

How do you explain a Democrat being against this policy, or for that matter coming up with the idea in the first place?
The democrat in question was either a homophobe, anti-gay, or believed that gays openly serving in the military would be detrimental to the quality of our armed forces.
 
Let's undermine our military and morality :D two shots with one decision...
 
This ridiculous post presumes an awful lot.

In order for your argument to succeed, sex would only be to procreate. If men and women have sex for any other reason, it defeats your entire point.
Men and Women must never have oral sex or anal sex. If they do, that defeats your entire argument and your point fails.
By this argument, it would be a sin to masturbate. Do you believe that masturbation is a sin? If so, there are an awful lot of sinners doing an awful lot of sinning.
and this doesn't even mention birth control. That would be a sin as well. Do you believe birth control is a sin?

You evidentally didn't read the whole post. You can't cherry pick. God made the sex act pleasant, or man and woman wouldn't be doing it, but the whole thing was for children. Of course, God knew men and women would have sex for fun, that's why he made it so good and why he made them attractive to each other, but with the knowledge that sex creates life. Nowhere has a penis in an anus created a child. It's just not normal.
 
The democrat in question was either a homophobe, anti-gay, or believed that gays openly serving in the military would be detrimental to the quality of our armed forces.

Don't you find it strange that he wasn't a gay bashing right-winged conservative?
 
This ridiculous post presumes an awful lot.

By this argument, it would be a sin to masturbate. Do you believe that masturbation is a sin? If so, there are an awful lot of sinners doing an awful lot of sinning.
and this doesn't even mention birth control. That would be a sin as well. Do you believe birth control is a sin?

The questions you are now asking could best be answered in the Religion forum and would make an entire discussion all to themselves.
 
The questions you are now asking could best be answered in the Religion forum and would make an entire discussion all to themselves.

I agree...but then so would your post since your post was based on those issues.

I'm glad that you could see that.
 
Back
Top Bottom