If that were true then you would not be supporting changing the law for homosexuals which you clearly do. Don't make me look up your own quotes on this.
Please do. It's amusing how you are still trying to distort my words.
Bull****. You support changing the LAW. To change a law requires and argument and it requires facts to go along with that argument. Your personal moral viewpoint on homosexuals is not ground for changing law under your own philosophy.
I vote for officials who I feel will change laws that are harmful to me or others as I would hope you vote for officials who change laws you feel are harmful to you and others. That is what a citizen is suppose to do, and expanding anyone's freedom as long as it doesn't infringe on another man's freedom, increases the freedom of everyone.
I listen fine. You just can't get your head around the fact that your definition of harmful is for you alone. When you change law it effects everyone so you cannot use your own moral judgment as an argument to change law. How is this so hard for you to understand?
I know very well what hurts me and what doesn't hurt me is my own subjective experience. I never denied it. But what hurts you and doesn't hurt you is your subjective experience. It is the same for everyone. But neither one of us can change the law alone. It is only when several people agree that a law is harmful to us or others that we are able to change it. So I'm not sure why you are accusing me of "changing the law'. I have no such power. I only have the power to vote and if no one else agrees with me, then my vote is useless.
Thats the whole damn point. You can't claim you support or are indifferent or whatever you want to call it about pedophilia then turn around and say if they act on it that is against the law. That is hardly "live and let live"
Let me break it down for you. Pedophilia is a mental disorder. A person does not have to molest children to be diagnosed as a pedophile. Look it up in the DSM. I have no problem with a pedophile who does not molest children. His issues are his own to deal with and hopefully he seeks help for them. Where I draw the line is when he acts in such a way that is harmful to others. That is why I have said, over and over again, that as long as someone is not hurting someone else or me, I could care less how they live their lives.
The hypocrisy you are displaying is truly amazing. How you think you can support pedos but not the action of pedos is really a sight to be seen.
I don't really "support" pedos. I just don't care what pedos do as long as they aren't molesting children and effectively harming people. That is this thing called "tolerance". I know that somehow you don't have that capability, but that is really your problem, not mine.
Again, the entire point of that example is to prove your "live and let live" philosophy is a sham because you would impose laws against pedos who perform the act and your argument to justify this claim is based solely on your own moral judgment so you do not have a "live and let live" philosophy. You have a "live and let live under my moral code" philosophy which is exactly what you use for your argument on homosexuality.
I don't impose laws on anyone. I'm one man. I can't create or enforce laws by myself. I only offer my input on what I consider harmful and what I don't consider harmful by voting just like everyone else does. For some sad reason, you believe that homosexuality and gay marriage are harmful even though you can't provide much of an explaination for why. Whereas I can provide a detailed rational explaination for why pedophilia is harmful, supported by evidence. But alas, something tells me you wouldn't understand it anyways.
But hey, it is amusing that are so uncomfortable with my ability to live without trying to control others that you are desperately trying to put me in the same box as you. Are you feeling a bit guilty? Sounds like a personal problem.