nonetheless is one word my man.
My grammar and spelling is not any better. Just thought you would like to know since you use it allot.
I don't know but, murders by gangs seem to be alive and well and the body count still climbing and this is only L.A. We can go to Chicago, Detriot, Houston, Washington
so what's a acceptable number of murdered to where we don't have to act, the body count is still high for one city.
How so?..this gangs where colors not very hard to find.
Having colors representing a armed force which creates a threat to the citizens of this land by threat of violence is unconstitutional. Now that said, it's up to the state government to neutralize that threat per the constitution by all means neccesary. These gangs are no longer a individual criminals but a group a militia hostile to the citizens of this land.
I didn't say your statistics where wrong, I said the gang murder rate is alive and well. So I will ask you how many murdered is acceptable to you?..100, 200, 1000
It's not unconstitutional to label them as a hostile force against the citizenary either because basically that's what they are, so it all boiles down to labels. Label the gangs correctly and the whole spectrum changes and law enforce can be rid of this vermon once and for all.
I am not ignoring you, i am on several other topics, not just this one. A few may have past me by.
So I want justice for some, come on we are talking about one gang currently, if you wish we can talk about all gangs but this will take quite some time. So in short if any group that is armed and creates a threat amongst the citizenry on a level such as the L.A. gangs or gangs in Chicago etc. than yes the same applies.
which one?
I would have but, as a rule I do not download unknown links to my PC sorry. I replied to your comment but, non the less what I stated still applies, we do not negotiate with gangs etc.
