• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tea Party Fireworks: Speaker Rips McCain, Obama, 'Cult of Multiculturalism'

Oh, you mean when dearest Rachel used a carefully edited clip of a man carrying his rifle to a meeting to link racism with anti-Obama people.

Then the reality was shown that the man carrying the weapons was blacker than your Messiah. You think maybe he was racist against half-breeds, or just that beloved Rachel is a really crappy and amateurish propagandist no one should watch?


Who is your Messiah?
 
Tom Tancredo is a racist pig

Denying that is like denying the sky is blue or the sun is hot.

Look back at many of his other interviews or speechs and it becomes quite clear

He is against every that is not white, and christian.

Having this douche bag speak at a function taints it (unless of course it is function serving a racist group of people)


The Tea Party would be wise to keep him from any more of their conventions
 
Where is the evidence of the group's racism or more importantly where is the evidence that Tancredo know they were? Go ahead.

There are many racists in the NAACP and Obama addressed them. Does that make him racist too? :roll:



Where is the evidence of the group's racism or more importantly where is the evidence that Tancredo know they were? Go ahead.

There are many racists in the NAACP and Obama addressed them. Does that make him racist too? :roll:



Wow are you out there. So in your mind we have a supreme court who is an open racist.

Did you know about Sotomayor? Not only did she address La Raza, she sat on their board.

Are you going to call her a racist as well or is this just for conservatives?


Still waiting for HIS racist comments. Direct quotes please.

So is Tom Tancredo so lazy that he would not research a group that he was going to speak at function for?

As for the League of the South being racist

if this is person is their president and this article truely his then yes it is as racist as they come

Proposition Be Gone! by J. Michael Hill

The League of the South, unlike the America of the New World Order, is not wedded to a universal proposition: equality, democracy, or the rights of man, but to a real historical order based on place and kin. If we are to survive as a distinct people with a physical place to live, work, and worship, then we must never waver from this commitment. Men much wiser than we can hope to be repeatedly caution that it is from our fathers, and not from abstractions, that we draw our sustenance as a separate, distinct, God-ordained people.
Historical order based on place and kin, not equality or rights
The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, subsequent legislation, and judicial edicts have allowed into the U.S. millions of non-Europeans while closing the “Golden Door” to European immigrants. They encourage Third World immigrants—both legal and illegal—to maintain their own cultures and languages while plundering America’s taxpaying citizens.
Note the focus on non europeans's. How many Russians Ukrainains, jews, Germans have maintained much of their culture, just as Mexicans or Nigerians have?

To survive and prosper, we have to adopt Frank Owsley’s attitude. The great Southern historian who said, “The term ‘folk’ has for its primary meaning a group of kindred people, forming a tribe or nation [in the truest sense of the word]; a people bound together by ties of race, language, religion, custom, tradition,and history... A folk thus possesses a sense of solidarity and is quite different from a conglomerate mass of people. It has most if not all of the characteristics of nationalism [again, properly defined]. Indeed, it may be contended with much force that there can be no true nationalismwhere the population does not constitute a folk.

Our primary objective should be to preserve our people—kith and kin—on their ancestral lands. Without our land, we cannot exist. The Southern people are not a “universal idea” any more than Germany, Holland, or Spain. There can be no Scotland in France among the French, but only in Scotland among the Scots. Once we secure our future as “the Southern people,” then, and only then, can we bring back States Rights and gain our independence. The South is a true nation built on realities of place and kinshipand history. Without it, we cannot survive.
How much do you want to bet that kinship for the league does not expend to those Americans of african, hispanic, or Asian ethnicity, but only to those of european ethnicity

What do we need?


A South where our borders are sealed against massive immigration.

A South where the Southern people protect their interests from the ravagesof multiculturalism and phony diversity.

A South where a prosperous, self-confident,and distinct people can welcomeinto its ranks, by its own choice and on its own terms, productive and sympathetic immigrants

So not only is the League of the South a bunch of Racist douche bags, they are a group of people who want the Soiuth to leave Union

Overall their ideology and goals mirror those of the Ayran nations, who wanted to form a "white homeland" in the Pacific North West
 
So is Tom Tancredo so lazy that he would not research a group that he was going to speak at function for?

As for the League of the South being racist

if this is person is their president and this article truely his then yes it is as racist as they come

Proposition Be Gone! by J. Michael Hill

Historical order based on place and kin, not equality or rights Note the focus on non europeans's. How many Russians Ukrainains, jews, Germans have maintained much of their culture, just as Mexicans or Nigerians have?

To survive and prosper, we have to adopt Frank Owsley’s attitude. The great Southern historian who said, “The term ‘folk’ has for its primary meaning a group of kindred people, forming a tribe or nation [in the truest sense of the word]; a people bound together by ties of race, language, religion, custom, tradition,and history... A folk thus possesses a sense of solidarity and is quite different from a conglomerate mass of people. It has most if not all of the characteristics of nationalism [again, properly defined]. Indeed, it may be contended with much force that there can be no true nationalismwhere the population does not constitute a folk.

Our primary objective should be to preserve our people—kith and kin—on their ancestral lands. Without our land, we cannot exist. The Southern people are not a “universal idea” any more than Germany, Holland, or Spain. There can be no Scotland in France among the French, but only in Scotland among the Scots. Once we secure our future as “the Southern people,” then, and only then, can we bring back States Rights and gain our independence. The South is a true nation built on realities of place and kinshipand history. Without it, we cannot survive.
How much do you want to bet that kinship for the league does not expend to those Americans of african, hispanic, or Asian ethnicity, but only to those of european ethnicity



So not only is the League of the South a bunch of Racist douche bags, they are a group of people who want the Soiuth to leave Union

Overall their ideology and goals mirror those of the Ayran nations, who wanted to form a "white homeland" in the Pacific North West

Yeah, what you siad.:)
 
I don't think most people fall with in the 2 categories, but why does everyone think that universal suffrage is an absolute good?

Where does this come from?
Haven't we read enough history to understand that democracy is nothing more than a dictatorship of the majority.

I believe there should be certain checks and balances, yes, but what it comes down to is that all people have a right to have a say in the government that runs them. All government runs by consent of the people. If people are not able to be an active part of that government, they can not give their consent, and can not be truly represented by that government.
 
Back
Top Bottom