• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama to call for 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal, adviser says

kansaswhig said:
I don't get it.

He is a drama queen.

He respects no one.

Those are two facts.

What's the problem?
Click to expand...

This thread is about gays in the military, not the fashion trends of Navy Pride.
 
Jerry said:
This thread is about gays in the military, not the fashion trends of Navy Pride.
Click to expand...

Navy has taken over the thread.

The destruction of his character is paramount at this juncture, which I will facilitate if I can.

Who said anything about fashion trends? I didn't call him a runway queen...I called him a drama queen because he is.
 
kansaswhig said:
Navy has taken over the thread.

The destruction of his character is paramount at this juncture, which I will facilitate if I can.

Who said anything about fashion trends? I didn't call him a runway queen...I called him a drama queen because he is.
Click to expand...

Reported for trolling :2wave:
 
Jerry said:
Reported for trolling :2wave:
Click to expand...

Everyone knows I'm right on this one. I can't believe you stuck up for Navy.

How old are you Jerry? Maybe Navy is your grandpa and you are sad because we are all picking on him.

I'll fall on my sword for this one. They can ban me from this thread, that's cool. I'm tired of arguing with senile folks.

And you tattled on me? :rofl
 
Moderator's Warning:
Discuss the topic, not each other. Thanks.
 
kansaswhig said:
You are the biggest drama queen I have ever seen. I bet you fit right in the Navy.

Don't tell me about combat casualties, old man. Those that really know don't even need to talk about it. Unlike you, who brings it up every chance he gets. That should tell everyone here all they need to know.

Just answer my question of how the Navy is apparently so distracted right now. That's what I asked. I didn't ask for an emotional diatribe, which was some lame attempt to paint me as lacking respect for the other services. If anyone on this entire forum lacks respect for others, it is you, sir.
Click to expand...


The truth hurts my left wing friend and name calling which is what you lefties always do won't change that and just remember this there is a whole bunch of Navy guys name on the wall in DC......
 
Navy Pride said:
The truth hurts my left wing friend and name calling which is what you lefties always do won't change that and just remember this there is a whole bunch of Navy guys name on the wall in DC......
Click to expand...

I wonder how many were gay?
 
Jerry said:
I agree but I don't think that matters...unless you want to take women completely out of the military also.

IMO any able bodied citizen who is willing to serve should be permitted the honor.
Click to expand...

I don't want women out of the military but I don't think the belong aboard Navy combatent ships...........
 
I agree wth Independent Thinker, lets get back on topic and discontinue insulting other members of the forum..........
 
I watched the hearings of the Armed Services Committee this morning on DADT held on Tuesday and Senator McCain had a listing of 1100 Flag and General Officers that were against the repeal of DADT...That sort of trumps Mullins and Gates.......Looks to me this is going to be a fight between the Right and the left in the Senate and I was glad to see Senator Webb From Va. a democrat step up and join the people on the right on his issue..........
 
Navy Pride said:
I watched the hearings of the Armed Services Committee this morning on DADT held on Tuesday and Senator McCain had a listing of 1100 Flag and General Officers that were against the repeal of DADT...That sort of trumps Mullins and Gates.......Looks to me this is going to be a fight between the Right and the left in the Senate and I was glad to see Senator Webb From Va. a democrat step up and join the people on the right on his issue..........
Click to expand...

What is their reasoning for opposing the repeal? What function does the ban perform?
 
Navy Pride said:
No arguement grom me and I salute them for their service and making the ultimate sacrafice...............
Click to expand...

No you don't. You want gays kicked out of the military.
 
Jerry said:
Hmm so let gays serve openly except in combat MOSs?
Click to expand...

I thought we were talking about women.........You know gays serving openly might work in the Airforce, Army, and Marine Corps but the Navy and the Coast Guard are unique organizations in that people live, sleep, dress showere 24/7 365 days a year whereas its a little different in the services I mentioned............
 
Jerry said:
What is their reasoning for opposing the repeal? What function does the ban perform?
Click to expand...

Unit Cohesion, Morale at a time when we are fighting 2 wars.....

It maintains unit cohesion and morale..........
 
Navy Pride said:
I thought we were talking about women.
Click to expand...

Not women only, no, but both in parallel per your 'gay men think like women when it comes to sex' argument.

Since gay man have the sexual attraction of hetero women, integrating gays in the way women were integrated seems to be the way to go.
 
winston53660 said:
Meh whatever DADT will be a thing of the past.



That applies to every one Heterosexual and homosexual right?
Click to expand...

No it doesn't.

An unwanted sexual advance of a heterosexual nature will result in disciplinary action such as loss of pay, rank, or non judicial punishment. In contrast, an unwanted sexual advance of a homosexual nature will result in a mandatory dishonorable discharge in addition to any other punishment.

This is true with or without DADT.
 
Last edited:
Jerry said:
No it doesn't.

An unwanted sexual advance of a heterosexual nature will result in disciplinary action such as loss of pay, rank, or non judicial punishment. In contrast, an unwanted sexual advance of a homosexual nature will result in a mandatory dishonorable discharge in addition to any other punishment.
Click to expand...

I should have said that should apply equally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom