• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin and McCain will campaign again

McCain is such an old man! I'm pretty sure he'll get creamed again.

Oh well now isn't that just a gem of analysis. Anything else you wanna contribute like maybe a commentary on how his hair is too white and his wrinkles too deep?
 
Navy.....we know that you are embarassed about voting for Bush....not once....but twice.
But C'mon man....you are never going to fool people into believing that you didn't like the man you called "a great and inspired world leader".

Just fess up. Yes, Bush was a disaster as a President....but don't run from your mistakes...admit them and move on.

I have explained my reason for voting for Bush a dozen times.Believe what you want DD.
 
This is the only thing you got correct in all that. I was speaking of Monegan and I misspoke Wooten.

As for the rest, the report still stated she did nothing illegal. You're just gonna have to learn to live with that.
You seem to be doing a lot of misspeaking in this thread from claiming oil companies gifted their plane to Murkowski to Wooten being fired to confusing Wooten with Monegan. It just further proves you have no idea what you're speaking of when you show adoration for Palin
Which part of she abused her power of office and was found to have violated the Alaska Ethics Act do you not understand?
 
Last edited:
Which part of she abused her power of office and was found to have violated the Alaska Ethics Act do you not understand?

Oh I see you are back from your little vacation.:2wave:

Don't bother, sparky. This thread has moved on past your deranged mutterings and irrelevant ramblings.

Glad to see you made it back though. :lol:
 
I conceded nothing. I merely pointed out how you obsessively clung to a word and tried to build the whole case around it. The oil companies were the driving force behind Murkowski's jet. You're just going to have to learn to live with that, also.
I didnt obsess around a word. When you use words like their like you did in the following context:

"Told the oil companies to shove it when she sold off their jet gifted to the previous governor."

it implies ownership. So yes you did claim the jet was owned by the oil company then sold to Murkowski. What proof do you have that the oil company was behind the jet? You just saying so doesnt prove it. Every source Ive seen states Murkowski bought it with State funds just as the State of Alaska owns many private planes. I could just as eaily say that the improvements on her house were made by the driving force of the oil companies as well.
 
First he was not nude.........second there are two kinds of conservativers, fiscal and social......
What else would you call not wearig any clothes in a cosmo spread besides being nude?
 
I have explained my reason for voting for Bush a dozen times.Believe what you want DD.

It all depends on what your reasons are this week.

For years you were saying how incredible GWB was and that he was a "Great and inspired world leader".

Now....even you are running away from his legacy and proclaiming that you never REALLY liked him, you had to hold your nose and vote for him.

I guess I'm just trying to decide which of your split personalities is out this week.
 
I didnt obsess around a word. When you use words like their like you did in the following context:

"Told the oil companies to shove it when she sold off their jet gifted to the previous governor."

it implies ownership. So yes you did claim the jet was owned by the oil company then sold to Murkowski. What proof do you have that the oil company was behind the jet? You just saying so doesnt prove it. Every source Ive seen states Murkowski bought it with State funds just as the State of Alaska owns many private planes. I could just as eaily say that the improvements on her house were made by the driving force of the oil companies as well.

Are you still obsessing over that simple word choice rather than the larger point? My, no wonder everyone forgot about your mutterings within 20 minutes of you getting the boot. :lol:
 
Oh I see you are back from your little vacation.:2wave:

Don't bother, sparky. This thread has moved on past your deranged mutterings and irrelevant ramblings.

Glad to see you made it back though. :lol:
Ah another concession instead of addressing your lack of knowledge you decide to ad hominem. As for your use of sparky I called you that last time, do you ever have original thoughts?
 
Are you still obsessing over that simple word choice rather than the larger point? My, no wonder everyone forgot about your mutterings within 20 minutes of you getting the boot. :lol:
Oh so now its a word choice. Another instance of you misspeaking and backpeddling. You said they owned the jet then lies and said you never said that. There is no proof they had anything to do with the jet no matter how much you pretend.
 
Ah another concession instead of addressing your lack of knowledge you decide to ad hominem. As for your use of sparky I called you that last time, do you ever have original thoughts?

We still muttering and rambling? I bet you can go on all day. Especially since you worked yourself into a frenzy just chomping at the bit to get back to the stomping you got in this thread, huh? :rofl

Keep going. I need some amusement today.:lol:
 
We still muttering and rambling? I bet you can go on all day. Especially since you worked yourself into a frenzy just chomping at the bit to get back to the stomping you got in this thread, huh? :rofl

Keep going. I need some amusement today.:lol:
We're not in the basement anymore toto ad homs aside this is the place to debate the topic.
 
We're not in the basement anymore toto ad homs aside this is the place to debate the topic.

Then get going, pal. There is nothing in the rules that bars me from taking a great amusement at your expense whilst you are making a caricature of yourself upstairs.

Do continue....:lol:
 
Then get going, pal. There is nothing in the rules that bars me from taking a great amusement at your expense whilst you are making a caricature of yourself upstairs.

Do continue....:lol:
Im refuting your lack of knowledge on specific points in regards to Palin while you refuse to debate as usual.

I'll ask you again what dont you understand about Palin abusing her office and violating the Alaska State Ethics Act as attested by the Branchflower Report?
 
Im refuting your lack of knowledge on specific points in regards to Palin

I think OC said it best..."let me know when your perception ever decides to intersect reality".

:lol::lol::lol:
 
I think OC said it best..."let me know when your perception ever decides to intersect reality".

:lol::lol::lol:
And in this case it would be entirely relateable to your satirical potrayal of Sarah Palin as some super hero crimefighter.

Its okay if you dont want to debate what I said regarding the plane, the branchflower report, wooten, and the other supposed corruption fighting things you claimed; just man up and admit to your deflection.
 
And in this case it would be entirely relateable to your satirical potrayal of Sarah Palin as some super hero crimefighter.

Its okay if you dont want to debate what I said regarding the plane, the branchflower report, wooten, and the other supposed corruption fighting things you claimed; just man up and admit to your deflection.

You keep demanding that I make some concession for your convenience. I am not in the habit of making concessions to spare the feelings or ease to obsessions of others, especially when such concessions are not true in the least.

You have done nothing except spin your wheels in the mud you created by walking into the quagmire that your dishonesty created. I am loving how your struggles only make you sink further in. And all the while you beg me to tell you that you are right. Beg away...I love hearing it.

But I would be a jackass if I didn't tell you up front that all your begging is serving no purpose save my own amusement. It will get you nothing.
 
You keep demanding that I make some concession for your convenience. I am not in the habit of making concessions to spare the feelings or ease to obsessions of others, especially when such concessions are not true in the least.

You have done nothing except spin your wheels in the mud you created by walking into the quagmire that your dishonesty created. I am loving how your struggles only make you sink further in. And all the while you beg me to tell you that you are right. Beg away...I love hearing it.

But I would be a jackass if I didn't tell you up front that all your begging is serving no purpose save my own amusement. It will get you nothing.
I dont have to demand for a concession you already have conceded. Everytime you refuse to discuss the topic we were talking about it is a concession. The only one being dishonest here is you from the lie you made about the plane to the branchflower report to trooper wooten all subjects you dropped because you "misspoke"
 
I dont have to demand for a concession you already have conceded.

I think it's very brave of you to try to bend reality to your will. I also think it's a hallmark of insanity to continue the same action repeatedly and expect a different result from it each time.

Everytime you refuse to discuss the topic we were talking about it is a concession.

So far, since you returned from your vacay, all you have done is shrilly proclaim how right you are while simultaneously begging me to tell you that you are right. :confused:

The only one being dishonest here is you from the lie you made about the plane to the branchflower report to trooper wooten all subjects you dropped because you "misspoke"

Ummm, I gave you as a gift one point of contention to call all your own. And I basically made an honest mistake in using Wooten's name instead of Monegans, but it was clear that Monegan was the issue I was discussing. So if my making a typo makes you feel that great about yourself...you should get involved in an Iran/Iraq discussion with me. I mistype those all the time. You'd be high as kite for days off the euphoria from one of those threads, pal.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
I think it's very brave of you to try to bend reality to your will. I also think it's a hallmark of insanity to continue the same action repeatedly and expect a different result from it each time.



So far, since you returned from your vacay, all you have done is shrilly proclaim how right you are while simultaneously begging me to tell you that you are right. :confused:



Ummm, I gave you as a gift one point of contention to call all your own. And I basically made an honest mistake in using Wooten's name instead of Monegans, but it was clear that Monegan was the issue I was discussing. So if my making a typo makes you feel that great about yourself...you should get involved in an Iran/Iraq discussion with me. I mistype those all the time. You'd be high as kite for days off the euphoria from one of those threads, pal.

:lol::lol::lol:
Nothing shrill about it. I refuted what you said and you refused to debate it. Your mixup of Wooten and Monegan further shows you not doing thorough research. You claimed Wooten was fired and the oil companies gifted their plane to murkowski in the same post. Both false statements that now you backtrack on. These are amateur mistakes you keep making in this thread. It further show your lack of doing credible research on Palin. So lets start over how exactly did Palin fight corruption?
 
It all depends on what your reasons are this week.

For years you were saying how incredible GWB was and that he was a "Great and inspired world leader".

Now....even you are running away from his legacy and proclaiming that you never REALLY liked him, you had to hold your nose and vote for him.

I guess I'm just trying to decide which of your split personalities is out this week.

Come on jallman your drinking DDs koolaid.......Lets put this thing to rest once and for all...Make sure your buddy sees it..........in 2000 I voted for Bush thinking he was a true Conservative....Even if he had not been I still would have voted for him because who his opponent was.......Same for Kerry in 2004..........Bush fooled me in 2000.........He was a social conservative but a very moderate fiscal Conservative........He spent money like a democrat or a drunken marine........That really pissed me off........In 2004 if the dems would have run anyone who was the slightest conservative I might have voted for them but instead they ran a liar and a cheat at best and at worse a traitor to this country........No way I could vote for him........

Bush did do some good things though in regime change in Iraq, going after Bin laden in Afghanistan, installing 2 hard core Conservative justices to the SCOTUS, and giving much needed tax relief which stimulated the economy and dropped interest rates to the lowest in 50 years.........In addition unemployment was down to around 5%....As soon as the dems took over the congress in 2006 all this changed and when Obama became prez he started spending and trying to turn this country into a socialist state causing us to be in the situation we are presently in........

Bush had his weaknesses but I believe history will judge him as a decent president, at least better then Clinton and Carter and probably Obama.

Now I want you to make a note of this post because it is my honest opinion of President Bush and if you and Comrade DD bring it up I will just cut and paste and repost this...........

Have a good day my friend............
 
Back
Top Bottom