• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin and McCain will campaign again

Nothing shrill about it. I refuted what you said and you refused to debate it. Your mixup of Wooten and Monegan further shows you not doing thorough research. You claimed Wooten was fired and the oil companies gifted their plane to murkowski in the same post. Both false statements that now you backtrack on. These are amateur mistakes you keep making in this thread. It further show your lack of doing credible research on Palin. So lets start over how exactly did Palin fight corruption?

Let's go back to the beginning of the thread and let you read for yourself exactly how.

The mix up of Wooten and Monegan was nothing more than a careless typo. It had nothing to do with research.

As to the rest, you are just regurgitating the same false claims that depict me as saying something I didn't say because you keep twisting what was actually said to fit the meaning you want. I'm not playing that game with you.

You may resume your shrill caterwauling as you are obsessed to do.
 
Come on jallman your drinking DDs koolaid.......Lets put this thing to rest once and for all...Make sure your buddy sees it..........in 2000 I voted for Bush thinking he was a true Conservative....Even if he had not been I still would have voted for him because who his opponent was.......Same for Kerry in 2004..........Bush fooled me in 2000.........He was a social conservative but a very moderate fiscal Conservative........He spent money like a democrat or a drunken marine........That really pissed me off........In 2004 if the dems would have run anyone who was the slightest conservative I might have voted for them but instead they ran a liar and a cheat at best and at worse a traitor to this country........No way I could vote for him........

Bush did do some good things though in regime change in Iraq, going after Bin laden in Afghanistan, installing 2 hard core Conservative justices to the SCOTUS, and giving much needed tax relief which stimulated the economy and dropped interest rates to the lowest in 50 years.........In addition unemployment was down to around 5%....As soon as the dems took over the congress in 2006 all this changed and when Obama became prez he started spending and trying to turn this country into a socialist state causing us to be in the situation we are presently in........

Bush had his weaknesses but I believe history will judge him as a decent president, at least better then Clinton and Carter and probably Obama.

Now I want you to make a note of this post because it is my honest opinion of President Bush and if you and Comrade DD bring it up I will just cut and paste and repost this...........

Have a good day my friend............


We understand that this is what you are saying about Bush THIS WEEK.....but a year ago you were saying what an incredible leader he was and what a marvelous job that he did for this country.

I understand your need to distance yourself from him.....but lets keep it honest.
You didn't always see GWB for the loser and the failure that he is. There was a time where you actually spoke of him in highly laudable ways.
 
We understand that this is what you are saying about Bush THIS WEEK.....but a year ago you were saying what an incredible leader he was and what a marvelous job that he did for this country.

I understand your need to distance yourself from him.....but lets keep it honest.
You didn't always see GWB for the loser and the failure that he is. There was a time where you actually spoke of him in highly laudable ways.

Can you read???

Come on jallman your drinking DDs koolaid.......Lets put this thing to rest once and for all...Make sure your buddy sees it..........in 2000 I voted for Bush thinking he was a true Conservative....Even if he had not been I still would have voted for him because who his opponent was.......Same for Kerry in 2004..........Bush fooled me in 2000.........He was a social conservative but a very moderate fiscal Conservative........He spent money like a democrat or a drunken marine........That really pissed me off........In 2004 if the dems would have run anyone who was the slightest conservative I might have voted for them but instead they ran a liar and a cheat at best and at worse a traitor to this country........No way I could vote for him........

Bush did do some good things though in regime change in Iraq, going after Bin laden in Afghanistan, installing 2 hard core Conservative justices to the SCOTUS, and giving much needed tax relief which stimulated the economy and dropped interest rates to the lowest in 50 years.........In addition unemployment was down to around 5%....As soon as the dems took over the congress in 2006 all this changed and when Obama became prez he started spending and trying to turn this country into a socialist state causing us to be in the situation we are presently in........

Bush had his weaknesses but I believe history will judge him as a decent president, at least better then Clinton and Carter and probably Obama.

Now I want you to make a note of this post because it is my honest opinion of President Bush and if you and Comrade DD bring it up I will just cut and paste and repost this...........

Have a good day my friend............
 
Let's go back to the beginning of the thread and let you read for yourself exactly how.

The mix up of Wooten and Monegan was nothing more than a careless typo. It had nothing to do with research.

As to the rest, you are just regurgitating the same false claims that depict me as saying something I didn't say because you keep twisting what was actually said to fit the meaning you want. I'm not playing that game with you.

You may resume your shrill caterwauling as you are obsessed to do.
Yes your post at the beginning of the thead had little to do with actual research as well as your mixup. You claimed at the beginning of the thread wooten was fired not once but several times you had no confirmation of him being fired so I wonder where the claim came from. You still insist the oil companies had something to do with the plane after originally claiming they gifted their plane to murkowski. I didnt need to spin. You actually did claim it was their plane no matter how much you backtrack now.

You can fancy this up however you like trebek but you're merely showing your refusal to have an honest open debate. So far when called on your lack of research you throw hissy fits like you're doing now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom