- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 20,688
- Reaction score
- 7,320
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
An amendment...you do know what the amendment process is, 2/3rds majority and all of that....would "yank" the issue away from Constituents? Really? What other federal emendment yanks decision making from the constituent?
None so far, and I'd like to keep it that way.
Charles Martel said:Can we stop the federal funds supporting your fair city then? I mean if it ain;t none of my business.......why should ANYTHING going on in DC...ACORN, poverty, AIDS, crime, gun control, why should ANY of it be under government purview, correct? Sure you've thought this argument out, it sounds unreasonable to me. Unrealistic and flat out silly really.
Every state in the country has ACORN, poverty, AIDS, crime, and gun control...yet the federal government doesn't have veto power over anyone else's laws. Congress should butt out and let the people of DC run DC, unless the law somehow interferes with the operations of the federal government.
Last edited: