• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Attacked Asian Students Afraid To Go to School

Rednecks are a rather nebulous demographic. I haven't seen that designation of the U.S. census yet. :2razz:

I havent really seen a demographic for "ghetto hood bangers" yet either. And that's really mostly what we have been talking about as a systemic "African American" problem.
 
I havent really seen a demographic for "ghetto hood bangers" yet either. And that's really mostly what we have been talking about as a systemic "African American" problem.

That's very true.
 
I havent really seen a demographic for "ghetto hood bangers" yet either. And that's really mostly what we have been talking about as a systemic "African American" problem.

I always wondered...why do black people get the "African American" title when so many of them are so far removed from their direct ancestors. You wouldn't bother to find out anyone Else's ancestral nationality if they were white, amirite? :D
 
I always wondered...why do black people get the "African American" title when so many of them are so far removed from their direct ancestors. You wouldn't bother to find out anyone Else's ancestral nationality if they were white, amirite? :D

Two words: Political Correctness.
 
I always wondered...why do black people get the "African American" title when so many of them are so far removed from their direct ancestors. You wouldn't bother to find out anyone Else's ancestral nationality if they were white, amirite? :D

In the northeast it is very important what kind of white person your ancestors were.
 
In the northeast it is very important what kind of white person your ancestors were.

I can see that in terms of cultural heritage people would be proud (like the Italian-Americans or Irish-Americans), but on forms, paperwork, and the like all I see is "white (non-hispanic)" as the only thing referring to white folk. Is it just because there's so many different types of whitey? or...is it something more...
 
I can see that in terms of cultural heritage people would be proud (like the Italian-Americans or Irish-Americans), but on forms, paperwork, and the like all I see is "white (non-hispanic)" as the only thing referring to white folk. Is it just because there's so many different types of whitey? or...is it something more...

I wouldn't even know how to explain my heritage. I'm mixed from a few different European backgrounds.
 
I wouldn't even know how to explain my heritage. I'm mixed from a few different European backgrounds.

But for the most part do you think/call yourself an 'American' or 'White' if you're just referring to what you are without going into too much detail?
 
But for the most part do you think/call yourself an 'American' or 'White' if you're just referring to what you are without going into too much detail?

The only time I really think that I am white, is when I try to dance. Other wise it doesn't cross my mind.
 
I havent really seen a demographic for "ghetto hood bangers" yet either. And that's really mostly what we have been talking about as a systemic "African American" problem.

Bear in mind that there are plenty of polynesian, pinoy, viet, laotian, hmong, native american, and latino ghetto hood bangers...
 
Didn't take long to make this thread about something other than the topic. Did it?
 
Asian kids are phuckin' pansies. I bet they were whining that they were afraid of being made fun of for carrying Hello Kitty keychains or Pokemon cards. phuckin' dweebs got what they deserved. Gooks are also 10 times more racist than whites or blacks are. :rofl
 
It is very sad but it is not the fault of the black students. The fault lies with their upbringing and culture. They are brought up to hate other races as they may be a threat to the blacks. The school committee should make conscious efforts to teach racial tolerance to the students.
 
It is very sad but it is not the fault of the black students. The fault lies with their upbringing and culture. They are brought up to hate other races as they may be a threat to the blacks. The school committee should make conscious efforts to teach racial tolerance to the students.

Always the victims, never accountable for their own actions....;)
Racial tolerance begins at home....;)
 
Rural white rednecks are supposedly perpetrating all manner of predations on the country and the world, inciting acts of terror and global warming (ooga booga booga).
It's an empirical fact that white elites have caused far more destruction throughout the world than blacks of any SE strata. Rural white rednecks are not in charge but do often serve as cannon fodder. They are perceived as relatively safe scapegoats.
Yet the justice system is clogged with African American career criminals.
i.e. black market merchants and their underground enforcers.

Who made marijuana illegal and put it on the black market to begin with? I can tell you for sure that it wasn't black people.

Who made tobacco illegal? Wait, no one did. That's why white tobacco dealers grew rich as CEOs while black marijuana dealers got branded as thugs and drop-kicked into the rape camps otherwise known as prisons.

White tobacco CEOs have killed more people with their mass produced cigarettes than black pot dealers ever killed even after being forced into the underground. But which face are people more likely to associate with killing, a white face or a black face?

doctors-smoke-camel.jpg


Yeah, dealers in illegal drugs have to resort to street violence and hire violent enforcers in the underground because unlike dealers in legal drugs, they obviously can't be protected by the pigs. The white dominated system drew the first blood in the street wars by launching the War on Drugs in the first place. Research indicates that marijuana is much safer than tobacco (as used in cigarettes, anyway), yet marijuana was made illegal. Guess what? America's marijuana laws were pushed through by white racists.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3XI8RIbHa8"]YouTube- History of Racism in Drug Laws[/ame]

Leaving that aside for a moment, we need to put this violence in perspective. Henry Kissinger has more blood on his hands than all those terrible "black thugs" put together, and he got the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't think Obama's white half getting the same prize for doing nothing does anything to rectify that injustice. Black criminals act on a neighborhood scale, white criminals on a global scale. It's the violence on a global scale that costs far more lives and leaves far more devastation in its wake. But white war criminals rarely get prosecuted, let alone brought to justice. The Nazis are the exception, and their "crime against humanity" involved killing Europeans on a massive scale. Anyone who thinks the Nazis would have been prosecuted for war crimes had they invaded Africa and committed genocide against Africans needs to take off the rose colored glasses and take another look at history.
And white redneck bigots are supposedly still choking the life out of African American culture yet if an African American is killed, 93.1% of the time, it's by another African American.
So blacks are the most supremacist race and they show this superior attitude by killing their own? Looks to me that their supposed racial solidarity is miles wide but inches deep. Looks to me that they're on the bottom of the figurative food chain, not the top. Sure, Americans have a half-black figurehead now but as right-wingers are fond of pointing out when they feel it serves their purposes, exceptions do not necessarily negate the overall rule. Some blacks are more powerful than some whites, but as a rule, power is overwhelmingly concentrated in white hands. We keep hearing about how black people now have all the privileges. But let's be real. The "wigger" phenomenon aside, how many white people would really want to trade places with black people?
 
Last edited:
it's an empirical fact that white elites have caused far more destruction throughout the world than blacks of any se strata. Rural white rednecks are not in charge but do often serve as cannon fodder. They are perceived as relatively safe scapegoats. I.e. Black market merchants and their underground enforcers.

Who made marijuana illegal and put it on the black market to begin with? I can tell you for sure that it wasn't black people.

Who made tobacco illegal? Wait, no one did. That's why white tobacco dealers grew rich as ceos while black marijuana dealers got branded as thugs and drop-kicked into the rape camps otherwise known as prisons.

White tobacco ceos have killed more people with their mass produced cigarettes than black pot dealers ever killed even after being forced into the underground. But which face are people more likely to associate with killing, a white face or a black face?

doctors-smoke-camel.jpg


yeah, dealers in illegal drugs have to resort to street violence and hire violent enforcers in the underground because unlike dealers in legal drugs, they obviously can't be protected by the pigs. The white dominated system drew the first blood in the street wars by launching the war on drugs in the first place. Research indicates that marijuana is much safer than tobacco (as used in cigarettes, anyway), yet marijuana was made illegal. Guess what? America's marijuana laws were pushed through by white racists.

youtube- history of racism in drug laws

leaving that aside for a moment, we need to put this violence in perspective. Henry kissinger has more blood on his hands than all those terrible "black thugs" put together, and he got the nobel peace prize. I don't think obama's white half getting the same prize for doing nothing does anything to rectify that injustice. Black criminals act on a neighborhood scale, white criminals on a global scale. It's the violence on a global scale that costs far more lives and leaves far more devastation in its wake. But white war criminals rarely get prosecuted, let alone brought to justice. The nazis are the exception, and their "crime against humanity" involved killing europeans on a massive scale. Anyone who thinks the nazis would have been prosecuted for war crimes had they invaded africa and committed genocide against africans needs to take off the rose colored glasses and take another look at history.
So blacks are the most supremacist race and they show this superior attitude by killing their own? Looks to me that their supposed racial solidarity is miles wide but inches deep. Looks to me that they're on the bottom of the figurative food chain, not the top. Sure, americans have a half-black figurehead now but as right-wingers are fond of pointing out when they feel it serves their purposes, exceptions do not necessarily negate the overall rule. Some blacks are more powerful than some whites, but as a rule, power is overwhelmingly concentrated in white hands. We keep hearing about how black people now have all the privileges. But let's be real. The "wigger" phenomenon aside, how many white people would really want to trade places with black people?

A: None.....;)
 
Last edited:
^^^^ There's the second most assinine pos......:roll:

Aren't you the clever boy?;) Ya really know how ta win friends and influence folks, dontcha? ;)
 
White tobacco CEOs have killed more people with their mass produced cigarettes than black pot dealers ever killed even after being forced into the underground. But which face are people more likely to associate with killing, a white face or a black face?

You do have actual proof and links for this statement right :shock:

Yeah, dealers in illegal drugs have to resort to street violence and hire violent enforcers in the underground because unlike dealers in legal drugs, they obviously can't be protected by the pigs. The white dominated system drew the first blood in the street wars by launching the War on Drugs in the first place. Research indicates that marijuana is much safer than tobacco (as used in cigarettes, anyway), yet marijuana was made illegal. Guess what? America's marijuana laws were pushed through by white racists.

Once again I ask you to show the proof that Pot is safer then Cigs. Also it's the Police if you can't use that term the you need to leave. Oh and for the record I suggest you go and read who actually put forth the Legst, to make Pot Illegal it might surprise you. Just saying



Leaving that aside for a moment, we need to put this violence in perspective. Henry Kissinger has more blood on his hands than all those terrible "black thugs" put together, and he got the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't think Obama's white half getting the same prize for doing nothing does anything to rectify that injustice. Black criminals act on a neighborhood scale, white criminals on a global scale. It's the violence on a global scale that costs far more lives and leaves far more devastation in its wake. But white war criminals rarely get prosecuted, let alone brought to justice. The Nazis are the exception, and their "crime against humanity" involved killing Europeans on a massive scale. Anyone who thinks the Nazis would have been prosecuted for war crimes had they invaded Africa and committed genocide against Africans needs to take off the rose colored glasses and take another look at history.
So blacks are the most supremacist race and they show this superior attitude by killing their own? Looks to me that their supposed racial solidarity is miles wide but inches deep. Looks to me that they're on the bottom of the figurative food chain, not the top. Sure, Americans have a half-black figurehead now but as right-wingers are fond of pointing out when they feel it serves their purposes, exceptions do not necessarily negate the overall rule. Some blacks are more powerful than some whites, but as a rule, power is overwhelmingly concentrated in white hands. We keep hearing about how black people now have all the privileges. But let's be real. The "wigger" phenomenon aside, how many white people would really want to trade places with black people?

Hey here is some word of advice if your going to make racist rants like this you might want to get your fact straight like the fact that Germany did invade Africa, every hear of the Africa Corp(General Rommel come to mind)

Also may I suggest you go and learn somethings about Dr.Kissinger like on how and why he won the Noble Peace Prize. Also if your going ot star a rant like this I suggest you might want to take a hard look at what has happen in Africa before you start making comments that White act in a Global scale. Oh and one other little item it was Black Aficans that introduced the concept of Slavery to White Traders in Africa and it was White Folks in the UK/France and the USA who fought and died to removed the blight of Black Slavery from the World.
 
It's an empirical fact that white elites have caused far more destruction throughout the world than blacks of any SE strata. Rural white rednecks are not in charge but do often serve as cannon fodder. They are perceived as relatively safe scapegoats. i.e. black market merchants and their underground enforcers.

Who made marijuana illegal and put it on the black market to begin with? I can tell you for sure that it wasn't black people.

Who made tobacco illegal? Wait, no one did. That's why white tobacco dealers grew rich as CEOs while black marijuana dealers got branded as thugs and drop-kicked into the rape camps otherwise known as prisons.

White tobacco CEOs have killed more people with their mass produced cigarettes than black pot dealers ever killed even after being forced into the underground. But which face are people more likely to associate with killing, a white face or a black face?

doctors-smoke-camel.jpg


Yeah, dealers in illegal drugs have to resort to street violence and hire violent enforcers in the underground because unlike dealers in legal drugs, they obviously can't be protected by the pigs. The white dominated system drew the first blood in the street wars by launching the War on Drugs in the first place. Research indicates that marijuana is much safer than tobacco (as used in cigarettes, anyway), yet marijuana was made illegal. Guess what? America's marijuana laws were pushed through by white racists.

YouTube- History of Racism in Drug Laws

Leaving that aside for a moment, we need to put this violence in perspective. Henry Kissinger has more blood on his hands than all those terrible "black thugs" put together, and he got the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't think Obama's white half getting the same prize for doing nothing does anything to rectify that injustice. Black criminals act on a neighborhood scale, white criminals on a global scale. It's the violence on a global scale that costs far more lives and leaves far more devastation in its wake. But white war criminals rarely get prosecuted, let alone brought to justice. The Nazis are the exception, and their "crime against humanity" involved killing Europeans on a massive scale. Anyone who thinks the Nazis would have been prosecuted for war crimes had they invaded Africa and committed genocide against Africans needs to take off the rose colored glasses and take another look at history.
So blacks are the most supremacist race and they show this superior attitude by killing their own? Looks to me that their supposed racial solidarity is miles wide but inches deep. Looks to me that they're on the bottom of the figurative food chain, not the top. Sure, Americans have a half-black figurehead now but as right-wingers are fond of pointing out when they feel it serves their purposes, exceptions do not necessarily negate the overall rule. Some blacks are more powerful than some whites, but as a rule, power is overwhelmingly concentrated in white hands. We keep hearing about how black people now have all the privileges. But let's be real. The "wigger" phenomenon aside, how many white people would really want to trade places with black people?

How many black people want to trade places with white people?
 
Back
Top Bottom