it's an empirical fact that white elites have caused far more destruction throughout the world than blacks of any se strata. Rural white rednecks are not in charge but do often serve as cannon fodder. They are perceived as relatively safe scapegoats. I.e. Black market merchants and their underground enforcers.
Who made marijuana illegal and put it on the black market to begin with? I can tell you for sure that it wasn't black people.
Who made tobacco illegal? Wait, no one did. That's why white tobacco dealers grew rich as ceos while black marijuana dealers got branded as thugs and drop-kicked into the rape camps otherwise known as prisons.
White tobacco ceos have killed more people with their mass produced cigarettes than black pot dealers ever killed even after being forced into the underground. But which face are people more likely to associate with killing, a white face or a black face?
yeah, dealers in illegal drugs have to resort to street violence and hire violent enforcers in the underground because unlike dealers in legal drugs, they obviously can't be protected by the pigs. The white dominated system drew the first blood in the street wars by launching the war on drugs in the first place. Research indicates that marijuana is much safer than tobacco (as used in cigarettes, anyway), yet marijuana was made illegal. Guess what? America's marijuana laws were pushed through by white racists.
youtube- history of racism in drug laws
leaving that aside for a moment, we need to put this violence in perspective. Henry kissinger has more blood on his hands than all those terrible "black thugs" put together, and he got the nobel peace prize. I don't think obama's white half getting the same prize for doing nothing does anything to rectify that injustice. Black criminals act on a neighborhood scale, white criminals on a global scale. It's the violence on a global scale that costs far more lives and leaves far more devastation in its wake. But white war criminals rarely get prosecuted, let alone brought to justice. The nazis are the exception, and their "crime against humanity" involved killing europeans on a massive scale. Anyone who thinks the nazis would have been prosecuted for war crimes had they invaded africa and committed genocide against africans needs to take off the rose colored glasses and take another look at history.
So blacks are the most supremacist race and they show this superior attitude by killing
their own? Looks to me that their supposed racial solidarity is miles wide but inches deep. Looks to me that they're on the bottom of the figurative food chain, not the top. Sure, americans have a half-black figurehead now but as right-wingers are fond of pointing out when they feel it serves their purposes, exceptions do not necessarily negate the overall rule. Some blacks are more powerful than some whites, but as a rule, power is overwhelmingly concentrated in white hands. We keep hearing about how black people now have all the privileges. But let's be real. The "wigger" phenomenon aside, how many white people would
really want to trade places with black people?