• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Governor says no more Arkansas parolees

Speaking to the Republican National Committee in July 1995, Gingrich called for the death penalty for anyone caught shipping narcotics into the country.

I could live with that.

Again, what does that have to do with a burglar in Arkansas who was given an excessively long sentence?
 
Reports in 1995 showed the overall level of crime declining slightly for the third year in a row, and such Republicans as Representative Bill McCollum of Florida attributed some of the dip to making convicts serve longer prison sentences, another policy for which Republicans have advocated during the 1990s. In fact, the Grand Old Party's anticrime proposal of 1995 included a provision that would require violent criminals to serve 85 percent of their prison terms. Such hardline policies as determinate sentencing advocated by conservative Republicans have not been without their costs, however, resulting in a U.S. prison population proportionately larger than that of any other country.
 
so you don't see the difference between executing a drug dealer and a long sentence for a burglar?
 
or rather, you don't see the similarity. sorry.
 
In fact, the Grand Old Party's anticrime proposal of 1995 included a provision that would require violent criminals to serve 85 percent of their prison terms. QUOTE]

Good idea.

Again, what does this have to do with a burglar in Arkansas who was never reportedly violent?

At least not until years later when he moved to Washington?
 
Originally Posted by Dayton3
Isn't she the one who stole her first election by insisting on a series of recounts until one showed she won and then her and the Democrats insisted that the process was over.

dayton is a sore loserman.
 
Notice how scotty is avoiding answering the questions by people here at every turn?
 
Originally Posted by Dayton3
Isn't she the one who stole her first election by insisting on a series of recounts until one showed she won and then her and the Democrats insisted that the process was over.

dayton is a sore loserman.

New here? ;) :cool:
 
In fact, the Grand Old Party's anticrime proposal of 1995 included a provision that would require violent criminals to serve 85 percent of their prison terms. QUOTE]

Good idea.

Again, what does this have to do with a burglar in Arkansas who was never reportedly violent?

At least not until years later when he moved to Washington?

so it depends on the definition of violent? burglary is not violent?
 
Originally Posted by Dayton3
Isn't she the one who stole her first election by insisting on a series of recounts until one showed she won and then her and the Democrats insisted that the process was over.

dayton is a sore loserman.

She lost the original vote.

She lost the first recount.

She lost the second recount.

She won the third recount.

Then she and the dems declared the process over.

Sounds like the fraudulent governor and the dems were the sore losers.
 
Notice how scotty is avoiding answering the questions by people here at every turn?

* Total Posts: 139
* Posts Per Day: 138.00
* Find all posts by scottsoperson
* Find all threads started by scottsoperson
 
Notice how scotty is avoiding answering the questions by people here at every turn?

And notice the constant use of the Strawman arguement.
 
She lost the original vote.

She lost the first recount.

She lost the second recount.

She won the third recount.

Then she and the dems declared the process over.

Sounds like the fraudulent governor and the dems were the sore losers.

i don't recall that many recounts. in florida they never counted all the votes. some repubs called us sore losermen. excuses excuses excuses.
 
And notice the constant use of the Strawman arguement.

one of you says i didn't answer any questions. the other one says my answers are strawman answers. make up your minds.
 
one of you says i didn't answer any questions. the other one says my answers are strawman answers. make up your minds.

We are of one mind on this.
 
i don't recall that many recounts. in florida they never counted all the votes. some repubs called us sore losermen. excuses excuses excuses.

The Democrats were sore losers in Florida because Gore was NEVER ahead in the vote.

In Washington, the Republican candidate won the initial election plus two recounts before the Democrat narrowly won the third and declared the process over.

That is exactly what the Democrats were planning in Florida. Recount the votes until they got one that showed Gore ahead then declare that it was ''time to let the healing begin".
 
In Washington, the Republican candidate won the initial election plus two recounts before the Democrat narrowly won the third and declared the process over.

this doesn't look like a link to me.

all the votes were never counted in florida. i guess all sore losermen have their excuses.
 
Back
Top Bottom