• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

IAEA chief: Iran probe at 'dead end'

rogerredy

Banned
Joined
Oct 17, 2009
Messages
314
Reaction score
93
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
ElBaradei: Iran nuclear investigation at 'dead end' | Iranian - Iran News | Jerusalem Post

Since the fascist murderous filth that is iran's government has now OFFICIALLY rejected the world's proposal, and 7 years of "diplomacy" have led nowhere - as anyone with a clue would have expected - it is clear that the only alternative is to bomb the iranian nuclear weapons program out of existence, and to depose this diseased regime.

I believe that your assessment is accurate as far as a solution being the removal of the current regime in Iran. However the combination of bombing of the nuclear facilities and removal of the regime are going to have to wait for a couple of things beginning with someone in the White House with back bone and next with someone in the same position with a comprehensive plan to take out the leadership in Iran and not completely alienate the majority of the population that don't hate everyone in the rest of the world.

The Iranian people were happy to see the corrupt & murderous Shaw be removed but I believe they were less than thrilled with the repressive replacement they got. Iran was a pretty secular society and they liked it that way. Today they are not too far from the Taliban type of repression.

So the solution had better be extremely well thought out comprehensive plan and include a strategy for dealing with the aftermath of what ever is decided upon.

Right now if I were running the Pentagon I'd be looking into what kinds of Military responses we are going to need at the ready in the event Israel goes it alone and ignites the tinderbox that is today's middle east.

Like it or not if Israel does mount a unilateral attack Obama is going to be in the hot seat and he will have decide what side he is going to support. If he stays out because of what as he has shown so far, is his Islamic sympathies, Israel may be forced go Nuclear to survive the possible Russian or Chinese intervention.

If this were to occur there is no telling where it could lead and having an amateur at the helm is going to be extra dangerous. Especially since Obama is seen as weak on any military issue and as I said before has Islamic sympathies that are going to complicate the issues.
 
I believe that your assessment is accurate as far as a solution being the removal of the current regime in Iran. However the combination of bombing of the nuclear facilities and removal of the regime are going to have to wait for a couple of things beginning with someone in the White House with back bone and next with someone in the same position with a comprehensive plan to take out the leadership in Iran and not completely alienate the majority of the population that don't hate everyone in the rest of the world.

Hi Councilman, it's good to see someone thoughtful weigh in.

The problem is that we do not have the time, and there are 2 reasons I can think of why the US has not already attacked iran, not only for its nuclear weapons program, but its complicity in the maiming and murder of hundreds of US troops in iraq:

1) iran already has a nuclear weapon, and may have handed it off to one of its terror proxies, either in the middle east, or in Europe, to use as a failsafe should it be attacked

2) iran has threatened to use significant amounts of terrorism against the West should it be attacked.

The Iranian people were happy to see the corrupt & murderous Shaw be removed but I believe they were less than thrilled with the repressive replacement they got. Iran was a pretty secular society and they liked it that way. Today they are not too far from the Taliban type of repression.

This is quite accurate, given the recent mass murders of protestors after the faked June elections.

Like it or not if Israel does mount a unilateral attack Obama is going to be in the hot seat and he will have decide what side he is going to support. If he stays out because of what as he has shown so far, is his Islamic sympathies, Israel may be forced go Nuclear to survive the possible Russian or Chinese intervention.If this were to occur there is no telling where it could lead and having an amateur at the helm is going to be extra dangerous. Especially since Obama is seen as weak on any military issue and as I said before has Islamic sympathies that are going to complicate the issues.

I gave Obama a year-long probation period, as I had hoped he would get smarter over time, but hasn't. He continues to make the same mistakes, catering to America's enemies, both internal and external, and shows little or no resolve regarding Iran, who is a cancer and must be destroyed.

I do not have high hopes for the quality of life for us over the next 20-50 years given the weakness of leadership, not only in the presidency but in congress overall.
 
The international community has given Iran until December to come to an agreement with the West.

Gotta wonder what's going to happen in January.
 
The international community has given Iran until December to come to an agreement with the West.

Gotta wonder what's going to happen in January.

Nothing.

Because by January, Iran is going to have a nuke, and if anyone messes with them, they're gonna blast Israel with it.

Iran needs to be flattened NOW.
 
Since the fascist murderous filth that is iran's government has now OFFICIALLY rejected the world's proposal, and 7 years of "diplomacy" have led nowhere - as anyone with a clue would have expected - it is clear that the only alternative is to bomb the iranian nuclear weapons program out of existence, and to depose this diseased regime.

I'm pretty sure there are other alternatives, even if you disagree with them.

Neitzluber said:
Because by January, Iran is going to have a nuke, and if anyone messes with them, they're gonna blast Israel with it.

This is nothing but warmongering propaganda and something that nobody with any common sense would take seriously.
 
Last edited:
ElBaradei: Iran nuclear investigation at 'dead end' | Iranian - Iran News | Jerusalem Post

Since the fascist murderous filth that is iran's government has now OFFICIALLY rejected the world's proposal, and 7 years of "diplomacy" have led nowhere - as anyone with a clue would have expected - it is clear that the only alternative is to bomb the iranian nuclear weapons program out of existence, and to depose this diseased regime.
I think it's time ElBaradei goes. He is an apologist for the Iranian nuclear weapons program. You can't trust the SOB.
 
The international community has given Iran until December to come to an agreement with the West.

Gotta wonder what's going to happen in January.
Not a GD thing will happen, cause we're all a bunch of ******s in the west. Iran needs a good asskicking.
 
I'm pretty sure there are other alternatives, even if you disagree with them.

What might those be?

This is nothing but warmongering propaganda and something that nobody with any common sense would take seriously.

Why is that? Iran has already been militarily attacking Israel since 1993 using proxies, and has led assaults murdering US troops and Iraqis in Iraq for several years.

Or to the terrorist apologists like yourself, since they were not in uniforms, they could not have been iranian.

Only the CIA could be guilty of conducting illicit wars out of uniform... :roll:
 
Not a GD thing will happen, cause we're all a bunch of ******s in the west. Iran needs a good asskicking.

The regime MUST be destroyed.

When serious adults stop look at the entire middle east equation, they realize that there is one primary rejectionist whose entire antagonistic existence is wholly dependent upon further conflict: Iran.
 
What might those be?

Anything.

Why is that?

Because the use of a nuclear warhead is suicide.

Or to the terrorist apologists like yourself

Is this supposed to make me feel bad about my position or something? I never understood why "people like you" (for lack of a better phrase to describe you, without getting an infraction, at least) say this. Seriously, grow up.

since they were not in uniforms, they could not have been iranian.

For someone that has posted here for such a short amount of time you sure know a lot about my politics! :roll:

the CIA could be guilty of conducting illicit wars out of uniform...

I'm glad you at least admit this much. :lol:
 
Anything.

Yeah, that's constructive. Well since you and the other children have no idea what to do, just be quiet and leave it up to us adults to do the thinking, alright?

Because the use of a nuclear warhead is suicide.

For the billionth time, since iran allowed almost no inspections, noone catalogued their uranium, and therefore, could drop one on you today - and you would not know who it came from.

I see that thoughtful responses isn't a part of your effort here.

Is this supposed to make me feel bad about my position or something? I never understood why "people like you" (for lack of a better phrase to describe you, without getting an infraction, at least) say this. Seriously, grow up.

Can someone on this forum tell me why this forum doesn't suck, with infantile, immature responses like this from internet teens with no facts or clue?
 
Yeah, that's constructive.

Of course it is. I'm just pointing out that nobody is being forced to bomb anyone, which is how you're attempting to justify your insane position.

Well since you and the other children have no idea what to do, just be quiet and leave it up to us adults to do the thinking, alright?

Nice attempt at "putting me in my place". :2wave:

For the billionth time, since iran allowed almost no inspections, noone catalogued their uranium, and therefore, could drop one on you today - and you would not know who it came from.

Uh, yes you would. These things are very easily traceable, even with Iran's lack of cooperation.

Can someone on this forum tell me why this forum doesn't suck, with infantile, immature responses like this from internet teens with no facts or clue?

So now you know how old I am, too. :lol:
 
Uh, yes you would. These things are very easily traceable, even with Iran's lack of cooperation.
No, no they aren't.
Certainly not suitcase nukes planted by a proxy terrorist organization anyway.
 
The international community has given Iran until December to come to an agreement with the West.
Gotta wonder what's going to happen in January.
The deadline will be extended. Repeatedly.
Until an Iranian nuke goes off in Israel, and Israel obliterates Iran.

Then, Bush will be blamed.
 
Back
Top Bottom