• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama "very close" to Afghan troop decision: TV report

I have seen no proof of what is common knowledge to those of you who claim it.

Forget him ten, the old obtuse grade school debating tactic. I guess he will do his virtual victory dance now and wonder why no one wants to answer his lame*** post on the future.
 
Forget him ten, the old obtuse grade school debating tactic. I guess he will do his virtual victory dance now and wonder why no one wants to answer his lame*** post on the future.

The problem is you make claims and refuse to back them up. You will not show percentages of educated people in each country.

The biggest difference between the two is Iraq is more urban and desert while Afghanistan has less big cities and a very mountainous treacherous terrain.

Both have Sharia law and barbaric uneducated punishment for law breakers.
 
So you support Obama even though he is a liar?

Merely because I disagree with your overly hyperpartisan view on life doesn't mean I support Obama. Unlike you, I can remove my bias from analysis. I can attempt to answer the hard questions rather then fleeing from them because I'm afraid to examine my beliefs.

Apparently you are completely unable to even acknowledge that both Bush and Obama faced the same problem. To you, only Obama deserves criticism for a problem Bush never even tried to solve.
 
Sure you don't.



Obama said a lot of stuff.

Doesn't change the fact that the underlying problems of Afghanistan haven't changed. You seem completely unwilling to even acknowledge that Bush never dealt with the key problem, but you have absolutely no problem bashing Obama on the same problem.

That's extreme hyperpartisanism at it's absolute worst.
Funny how everyone forgets that Bush caught or killed about 80% of the top al Qaeda leadership at the time.
 
Funny how everyone forgets that Bush caught or killed about 80% of the top al Qaeda leadership at the time.

bush_binladen.jpg
 
Funny how everyone forgets that Bush caught or killed about 80% of the top al Qaeda leadership at the time.

Please provide evidence of this. I wasn't aware we even knew who 80% of the top leaders were. And I'm not even sure it matters given how the organization actually functions. Granted, we didn't know exactly how it worked and I'm sure that under the Bush Administration we bagged a lot of scumbags but that in no way changes what you responded to.

How does your reply even address what I wrote?
 
Iraq culture centers on three basic religious/ethnic groups - Kurds, Sunni, and Shia. While an Iraqi considers himself a member of a clan the real association is with one of the three major groups. This makes politics and national organization easier since you have three groups to deal with that comprise about 98+% of the population. This helped the surge work as the surge took out the majority of the violently inclined members of the groups out in the six months of the surge. Iraq is also a developed country where travel by vehicle is fairly easy.

Afghanistan is completely different. The culture there centers on the tribe and/or clan - or about 200-3,000 people. There are well over 300 of these clans/tribes within Afghanistan. There are over 80 Punjab clans in the Afghan-Pakistan border region where the Taliban has its strength. Afghanistan is also a mountainous and rough country - where it can take a day or more for movement between adjacent areas for the normal citizen and may require a month or two from one point to another. This country is not going to benefit from a surge in the same manner that Iraq did. What a surge may do is enable the troops to break up more of the Taliban and al Queda cells in the border region and make their stance even more unpopular with the rest of the natives.

But despite all of that, you must admit that this topic started several weeks ago and we still are waiting for a decision. This is not very good for our troops, our citizens, our allies, or the people of Afghanistan. He could easily have made an interim decision on the focus for the in country troops rather than have everyone on hold waiting for his decision. A decision not to decide is still a decision, just a very bad one.

As an aside, let it be known that World War II combat operations ended in 1945 but the last Nazi partisan attack on Allied troops occurred in 1959 in southern Germany near Munich where a car bomb killed three French officers shortly after a military meeting in the area. This makes it 20 years from the start of WWII before it was completely over. So Iraq or Afghanistan taking 10 years is not that long in historical terms.
 
Show proof

I detest "proving" anything to you people.

UNESCO reports that prior to the first Gulf War in 1991 Iraq had one of the best educational performances in the region. Primary school Gross Enrollment Rate was 100% and literacy levels were high. Since that time education has suffered as a result of war, sanctions, and instability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Iraq

Looking it up instead of taking the "nu-uh" attitude would have gone a long way. Find your own "proof" of the real world or live in ignorance. Makes no difference to me.
 
Last edited:
I detest "proving" anything to you people.



Looking it up instead of taking the "nu-uh" attitude would have gone a long way. Find your own "proof" of the real world or live in ignorance. Makes no difference to me.

So ignore the facts then.
 
So ignore the facts then.

If you wish, but you could tap your mouse button on top of that link I provided to gain some insight. People who are unable to google a simple thing and then find too much difficulty on clicking on provided links are usually determined to remain clueless (but with great opinion, of course.) I am not here to prove reality. I am here to discuss, hopefully, with people who actually care to base their opinions on some sort of knowledge and wisdom. From the average ignorant citizen to the average ignorant Washington politician, "nu-uh" seems to serve people quite well.
 
Last edited:
Merely because I disagree with your overly hyperpartisan view on life doesn't mean I support Obama. Unlike you, I can remove my bias from analysis. I can attempt to answer the hard questions rather then fleeing from them because I'm afraid to examine my beliefs.

Apparently you are completely unable to even acknowledge that both Bush and Obama faced the same problem. To you, only Obama deserves criticism for a problem Bush never even tried to solve.

Only because Obama will not lead and make decisions when the requests are made. Obama is more concerned about politics then he is the safety of the troops and national security.

As for your statement I hope you don't mind I find it funny
JC-hysterical.gif
 
I detest "proving" anything to you people.



Looking it up instead of taking the "nu-uh" attitude would have gone a long way. Find your own "proof" of the real world or live in ignorance. Makes no difference to me.

Another words liberals should be taken at their word and you would want a different standard for conservatives?


What about Afghanistan? No higher education there?
 
Last edited:
Only because Obama will not lead and make decisions when the requests are made. Obama is more concerned about politics then he is the safety of the troops and national security.

And you are again ignoring how Bush took months on the Surge. Much less the full overhaul of Iraq strategy.

So much for reasonable discussion with you.

Democrat = Evil
Republican = Can Do No Wrong
 
obama's about to ESCALATE the war in afghanistan

how's that make you few remaining supporters of the president feel?

it's clear (to me) he's been holding off this decision, desperately trying to finish health care first

this is now no longer possible

health care, if it's not officially surrendered before, will still be being debated in april

in the meantime, how's ESCALATION of an afghan war play within obama's shrinking, exhausted base?
 
And you are again ignoring how Bush took months on the Surge. Much less the full overhaul of Iraq strategy.

So much for reasonable discussion with you.

Democrat = Evil
Republican = Can Do No Wrong

So it is bad for Bush and good for Obama. You have proof for your claims.
 
Another words liberals should be taken at their word and you would want a different standard for conservatives?

That's between you and who you discuss with. For me, if you wish to know something, I'll see what I can do to explain. Let me explain this...

The military has spent 8 years in Afghanistan developing cultural knowledge and wisdom. It has spent 11 years studying the Iraqi culture (ignored by the Rumsfeld coven) and another 6 years in Iraq up close with the culture. Couped with my persoinal dribve to undertand my enemy and my personal education in Middle Eastern studies I feel confident enough to carry on a discussion (if only to understand things a bit better for myself).

They are two different cultures and thusly two diffferent kinds of people. If you still refuse to see this then let me put it to you a different way...

The Russians were at a crossroad after the Berlin Wall came down. They could have traveled the western world of success or sought something familiar. In the later part of Yeltsin's presidency and throughout Putin's, they chose to surrender their individual liberties and freedoms one by one in exchange for security. Is something western Europeans could do? Americans? These are different civilizations with different cultures and histories. The Middle East is no different.

But if you prefer to "nu-uh" what I offer or to fall back on the "prove it" dismissals while refusing to perform a simple google search, then live in ignorance and do me a favor - ignore me.


What about Afghanistan? No higher education there?

As compared to Iraq? No. Don't confuse the difference between individuals and a society. The population of Afghanistan is largely "clan" based. Iraq is "tribal" based. Those who are educated in Afghanistan spend an enormous amount of time focused on clan power and preservation over national good.

Iraq spent a few years battering their way through their historical tendency's to hate each other. The Shia sought revenge while the Sunni sought to further prove their superiority. In the end, the two distinct tribes grew tired of swimming in Muslim blood. What they have is their long line of educational base amongst its population to push foreward. Afghanistan does not have this advantage. They are clan (gang, thugs, warlords,) based. Those who lived in the cities were only somewhat educated if they were males and they were subjected to Saudi built Madrasahs where religious Sharia was a big part of curriculum. Or do you think the secular Saddam Hussein and the religious Tali-Ban had similar goals in its education systems?


Think of Somalia and the almost impossibility of national unity and you will have an idea of what your troops are dealing with in Afghanistan while our politicians far away in Washington profess to know what's best.
 
obama's about to ESCALATE the war in afghanistan

how's that make you few remaining supporters of the president feel?


Fine if he gives the war fighters what they have asked for.

I find it odd how quickly people jump to assume that the White House knows more about an enemy than those who face them everyday. It's like a hospital administrator telling a surgeon that his advice on surgery is "noted," but he will need to take in the advice of non-doctors before he makes a decision.
 
Fine if he gives the war fighters what they have asked for.

I find it odd how quickly people jump to assume that the White House knows more about an enemy than those who face them everyday. It's like a hospital administrator telling a surgeon that his advice on surgery is "noted," but he will need to take in the advice of non-doctors before he makes a decision.

I respect you Marine, is there anyone you know, that thinks we should come home?
 
me, too, gysgt

i profess to having no clue about what to do in afghanistan

i just know the politics here at home, that after obama addresses the nation from west point tuesday, he's gonna have one hella pissed off dem party in washington to deal with

the congressional black caucus is gonna go ballistic over this by wednesday morning

msnbc's gonna be one angry network when i wake up that day

he's gonna have more than half of his own party in strong disagreement with his decision to ESCALATE over there

that all-capped E-word really bothers folks on the flowery side

obama's gonna do his own SURGE

libs aint gonna like it, he's acting just like bush

people on my side of the aisle---politically---are gonna question his commitment

either way, thanks for all you do for us, i feel a debt i can never repay

stay safe, please

and thank your people for us, too, your mom first and foremost

cliff
 
me, too, gysgt

i profess to having no clue about what to do in afghanistan

i just know the politics here at home, that after obama addresses the nation from west point tuesday, he's gonna have one hella pissed off dem party in washington to deal with

the congressional black caucus is gonna go ballistic over this by wednesday morning

msnbc's gonna be one angry network when i wake up that day

he's gonna have more than half of his own party in strong disagreement with his decision to ESCALATE over there

that all-capped E-word really bothers folks on the flowery side

obama's gonna do his own SURGE

libs aint gonna like it, he's acting just like bush

people on my side of the aisle---politically---are gonna question his commitment

either way, thanks for all you do for us, i feel a debt i can never repay

stay safe, please

and thank your people for us, too, your mom first and foremost

cliff

epicdude86-albums-stuff-picture1197-obama-cool-story-bro.jpg
 
I respect you Marine, is there anyone you know, that thinks we should come home?

Of course...at all levels. I see it in the voices of those who wear stars and are asking for more troops and those who are students in Comm School asking about who the enemy is. But then again, there are also plenty who are just looking to get back in the fight wherever that is and could care less about wider visionary things.

In the end there are only two options that are at least practical...

1) Give the Generals what they have voiced to need.

-OR-

2) Pull out and simply execute punitive strikes upon the bad guys as we please from afar in conjunction with MEU and special forces.


Number 2 is the best option because Afghanistan is never going to be anything but Afghanistan. In the end we will only be legitimizing a horribly corrupt government that seeks the preservation of distinct clans rather than a national unity (In this sense, this is at least a little better than Vietnam.) We will simply give further "ammo" to the religious extremists who seek earthly justification for his salvational calling.

Denying the commanders the troops they are asking for is exactly what Rumsfeld did and we saw the results of not listening to the duty experts. Opting to order the troops to bring an impractical victory where there is none without the tools it clearly states that it needs will only make this effort longer, costlier, and deadlier than it has to be (sound familiar?). If this happens, just wait and see how quickly the Democrats and Liberals cling to support their guy just like Republicans and Conservatives did for Bush. And both will lose sight of the military's side of things as they rush to blame all the wrong things and criticize the military for not bringing absolute victory as defined by the media.
 
Last edited:
Of course...at all levels. I see it in the voices of those who wear stars and are asking for more troops and those who are students in Comm School asking about who the enemy is. But then again, there are also plenty who are just looking to get back in the fight wherever that is.

In the end there are only two options that are at least practical...

1) Give the Generals what they have voiced to need.

-OR-

2) Pull out and simply execute punitive strikes upon the bad guys as we please from afar in conjunction with MEU and special forces.


Number 2 is the best option because Afghanistan is never going to be anything but Afghanistan. In the end we will only be legitimizing a horribly corrupt government that seeks the preservation of distinct clans rather than a national unity (In this sense, this is at least a little better than Vietnam.) We will simply give further "ammo" to the religious extremists who seek earthly justification for his salvational calling.

Denying the commanders the troops they are asking for is exactly what Rumsfeld did and we saw the results of not listening to the duty experts. If this happens, just wait and see how quickly the Democrats and Liberals cling to support their guy just like Republicans and Conservatives did for Bush. And both will lose sight of the military's side in their quest to prove their partisan slavery (but blame the military for not bringing absolute victory as defined by the media).

Thank you for that, and I agree, the second option is the best option, and I hope our brothers and sisters get home soon!
 
Thank you for that, and I agree, the second option is the best option, and I hope our brothers and sisters get home soon!

Well, if they don't then they will do the best they can with what our civilian leaders leave them with. Nothing new.
 
Back
Top Bottom