- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,838
- Reaction score
- 68,929
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
How is it different to kill a civilian with a drone than to kill him with an assault rifle or an aerial bomb?
Or a suicide vest.
It's not that we can fully avoid civilian causality, it's how caviler we're going to be about it. Do we just say "**** it" and glass the entire region? Or do we try to limit what and who we hit. With the drones, I'm not sure exactly the argument, but it seems that the contention is that you're mostly hitting civilian areas and targets with them.