- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,909
- Reaction score
- 11,003
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
USA Today said:A Treasury Department watchdog is warning that a key $700 billion bailout program has damaged the government's credibility, won't earn taxpayers all their money back and has done little to change a culture of recklessness on Wall Street.
"The American people's belief that the funds went into a black hole, or that there was a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to Wall Street, is one of the worst outcomes of this program, and that is the reputational damage to the government," said Neil Barofsky, special inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), in an interview.
...
"We don't even know where the money went," says Rep. Daniel Lipinski, D-Ill., who recently called for TARP assistance to end in December, when it's set to expire. The Treasury has the authority to extend the program until next October.
LINK 1
Bad huh? Bad like all of us who were against these bull**** bailouts from the beginning said they would be. Why? Because that's what government does with money - pisses it away. But wait... it get's better...
[quote="USA Today"
Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky, who is in charge of overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), said Treasury's failure to provide more details about the use of TARP funds has helped damage "the credibility of the program and of the government itself, and the anger, cynicism, and distrust created must be chalked up as one of the substantial, albeit unnecessary, costs of TARP."
Barofsky has made 41 recommendations to better implement the program, of which Treasury has executed 18 and partially adopted seven.
One proposal calls for Treasury to require all of the hundreds of TARP recipients to report how they use the funds, which the Treasury has applied to only three of the largest recipients —American International Group, Citigroup and Bank of America.
Barofsky also describes at least nine unimplemented proposals, saying their adoption "could help bring greater transparency to TARP and answer some of the criticisms of the program."
Several recommendations dealt with the Making Home Affordable program, which has access to $50 billion of TARP funds.[/quote]
LINK 2
So let's summarize... TARP was a fiasco. They don't know where the money went... there's still a belief it helped avoid a depression but there's no evidence in my opinion, to substantiate. And the "transparency" is transparent - in fact so transparent it doesn't exist at all. Sounds great. 700 billion down the ****ter, little to no return expected on any of it (remember all the nonsense about how we're all going to make our money back and then some!? ) and not only do we not know where the money went, but for all we know, it was spent on hookers, a lot of blow and Vegas trips to the Bunny Ranch.
Well, at least some working stiffs are making out on the deal.