• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

TheNextEra said:
Soldiers are controlled by the government policies. Right or wrong he is complaining about the GOVERNMENT.

Either way a claim was made that he was complaining about the existence of Israel. That claim is false.
Click to expand...
You seem to have a deep, strong, reading comprehension problem.
When he calls soldiers "a bunch of racist evil little kids" he's not complaining about policies, he is simply attacking the soldiers themselves and their personalities.
Not one of the soldiers, not two, all of them.
How is that not understandable?
If I tell you "All of the workers in Google are lazy sons of bitches", I am attacking Google's workers, and not their policy.

I am deeply surprised by your lack of the ability to draw assumptions from texts.
 
Apocalypse said:
You seem to have a deep, strong, reading comprehension problem.
When he calls soldiers "a bunch of racist evil little kids" he's not complaining about policies, he is simply attacking the soldiers themselves and their personalities.
Not one of the soldiers, not two, all of them.
How is that not understandable?
If I tell you "All of the workers in Google are lazy sons of bitches", I am attacking Google's workers, and not their policy.

I am deeply surprised by your lack of the ability to draw assumptions from texts.
Click to expand...

Ah yes.

So when someone refers negatively to the Nazis, that someone then hates all Germans!
 
ElBaradei is nothing more than a Muslim turncoat. He's a one man sleeper cell inside the nuclear commission. This was probably planned years ago, just like the UN is home to the world biggest despots.
 
creation said:
Ah yes.

So when someone refers negatively to the Nazis, that someone then hates all Germans!
Click to expand...
A ridiculous and pathetic try at an off-reality analogy that has no shard of connection to my words in the quoted post, and can only be described as the unavoidable failure in truth denouncement.

In order to crush your false analogy into pieces, destroy it, and send it to the place where it belongs and where no rational human being shall ever linger, it is sufficient to mention that the absolute majority of Germans are not Nazis.

Furthermore, speaking of the IDF soldiers as "a bunch of racist evil kids" is a direct claim that IDF soldiers are racist and evil.
This is an obvious attack on Israelis(And not only because the IDF is compulsory), and should never be referred to as "mere criticism" by he who is willing to keep a rational poster's credibility.
 
Apocalypse said:
You seem to have a deep, strong, reading comprehension problem.
When he calls soldiers "a bunch of racist evil little kids" he's not complaining about policies, he is simply attacking the soldiers themselves and their personalities.
Not one of the soldiers, not two, all of them.
How is that not understandable?
If I tell you "All of the workers in Google are lazy sons of bitches", I am attacking Google's workers, and not their policy.

I am deeply surprised by your lack of the ability to draw assumptions from texts.
Click to expand...

Yes he is attacking SOLDIERS which are controlled by the GOVERNMENT. He is not attacking ALL Israelis, nor does that mean he is saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist. Right or wrong, his problem is with Isreals government and how it is acting.

It is you with the reading comprehension problem, not me.
 
Last edited:
creation said:
Ah yes.

So when someone refers negatively to the Nazis, that someone then hates all Germans!
Click to expand...

Actually, it's pretty easy to sort out who is a Nazi and who isn't.

The Nazis focused their hatred on Jews ;)
 
TheNextEra said:
Yes he is attacking SOLDIERS which are controlled by the GOVERNMENT. He is not attacking ALL Israelis, nor does that mean he is saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist. Right or wrong, his problem is with Isreals government and how it is acting.
Click to expand...
The military is in control of the soldiers, not the government, the government is in control of the military but no direct control of the soldiers.
Although this is pointless as his argument was that Israeli soldiers are a bunch of 'racist evil kids', so that makes it quite clear as to who he had an issue with and who he truly attacked.
If you were anything but irrational you would understand that saying 'Liberalism is stupid' is way different from saying 'Everyone who is slightly liberal is a racist dumb****'.
It is you with the reading comprehension problem, not me.
Click to expand...
Said the person with the reading comprehension problem.
 
Apocalypse said:
The military is in control of the soldiers, not the government, the government is in control of the military but no direct control of the soldiers.
Click to expand...

Right, because the government never tells the military where to go or what to do :doh

Apocalypse said:
Although this is pointless as his argument was that Israeli soldiers are a bunch of 'racist evil kids', so that makes it quite clear as to who he had an issue with and who he truly attacked.
If you were anything but irrational you would understand that saying 'Liberalism is stupid' is way different from saying 'Everyone who is slightly liberal is a racist dumb****'.
Said the person with the reading comprehension problem.
Click to expand...


Again, your lack of reading comprehension is astounding, nowhere is he saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist which has been yours and Goobie's claim. Sorry but you lost.
 
TheNextEra said:
Right, because the government never tells the military where to go or what to do :doh
Click to expand...
...Reading comprehension problem, anyone?
Apocalypse said: "The government controls the military that controls the soldiers, but the government does not control the soldiers directly."
TheNextEra said: "Right, because the government doesn't control the military".
Bullseye, TheNextEra, bullseye.
TheNextEra said:
Again, your lack of reading comprehension is astounding, nowhere is he saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist which has been yours and Goobie's claim. Sorry but you lost.
Click to expand...
Post #122(http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-threat-mideast-report-13.html#post1058298049) in this thread, made by Apocalypse:
Apocalypse said:
Where did I make the conclusion that he is against the entire existence of Israel(Something that is very possible nevertheless)?
Either point me to where I've made that conclusion or refrain from making false assumptions.
Click to expand...

Reading. Comprehension. Problem.
 
Last edited:
Apocalypse said:
...Reading comprehension problem, anyone?
Apocalypse said: "The government controls the military that controls the soldiers, but the government does not control the soldiers directly."
TheNextEra said: "Right, because the government doesn't control the military".
Bullseye, TheNextEra, bullseye.
Click to expand...

Again, reading comprehension problem for you, the soldiers are in the military, the government makes policy for the soldiers to follow. So if the government makes policy for the military to do something, then the soldiers have to follow that DUH.

Really, is it that hard for you to understand this or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing.

Reading. Comprehension. Problem.
Click to expand...

yes, you are having a big problem with that, glad you finally admit it.
 
TheNextEra said:
Again, reading comprehension problem for you, the soldiers are in the military, the government makes policy for the soldiers to follow. So if the government makes policy for the military to do something, then the soldiers have to follow that DUH.
Click to expand...
And in other words;
The government controls the military, the military controls the soldiers.
The government indirectly controls the soldiers.
Basic assumptions from the text, done by a person without a reading comprehension problem.

Are you denying these statements for facts?
Are you saying that the listed statements are wrong?
Are you opposing truth?
Really, is it that hard for you to understand this or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing.
Click to expand...
Of course, I always enjoy arguing with stubborn posters who won't embrace the truth. :roll:
yes, you are having a big problem with that, glad you finally admit it.
Click to expand...
Thought about making a stand-up show?
 
Apocalypse said:
And in other words;
The government controls the military, the military controls the soldiers.
The government indirectly controls the soldiers.
Basic assumptions from the text, done by a person without a reading comprehension problem.

Are you denying these statements for facts?
Are you saying that the listed statements are wrong?
Are you opposing truth?
Click to expand...

Are you denying that if the government makes polciy for the military to follow, that the military (and therefore the soldiers) doesn't have to follow it?

Apocalypse said:
Of course, I always enjoy arguing with stubborn posters who won't embrace the truth. :roll:
Click to expand...

You argue with yourself? Interesting...

Apocalypse said:
Thought about making a stand-up show?
Click to expand...

Nah I just enjoy verbally beating people like you. :2wave:
 
TheNextEra said:
Are you denying that if the government makes polciy for the military to follow, that the military (and therefore the soldiers) doesn't have to follow it?
Click to expand...
You did not answer my questions, are you dodging something?
The truth, perhaps?
You argue with yourself? Interesting...
Nah I just enjoy verbally beating people like you. :2wave:
Click to expand...
I've met funnier people in the intensive care room during a risky surgery of a 5 years old kid.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Knock it off with the reading comprehension attacks or I start thread banning.
 
Tashah said:
Moderator's Warning:
Knock it off with the reading comprehension attacks or I start thread banning.
Click to expand...


Have I ever told you how sexy you are when you're dispensing mod justice?

:mrgreen:
 
EgoffTib said:
Again, it is not a racist term.

Zionist is a term often heard, but it's not always understood. Many people assume that to be a Zionist, someone must also be Jewish, or conversely, that all Jews are Zionists. This is not the case.

It appears that the term Zionist was coined in 1890 by Nathan Birnbaum, a Viennese scholar and intellectual. He used Zionist and Zionism to refer to what was basically a political movement, one that would result not only in the return of the Jewish people to their ancestral homeland in Palestine, but a return with political sovereignty.

So, again, stop all of the ignorant hyperbole and start thinking things through before you post. I grow weary of watching nearly everyone of your posts look like this.
Click to expand...

Zionist is a racist term and it is a violation of CC's Martial Law rules.
 
TheNextEra said:
Please explain why zionist is a racist term. The definition has nothing to do with race:
Click to expand...

Nextra,

I consider it a racist term because its use by muslims is derogetory 99% percent of the time. The conotation for its use is negative and meant to be demeaning.

As such, I take it as an insult and a class label. It just stinks of insulting rhetoric. Maybe I am wrong but I find it insulting and demeaning.
 
SE102 said:
How have i implicated that its the existence of israel itself that is a problem.

YOU may think that.

YOU can go ahead thinking anyone who thinks similarly thinks that. You're just a oversensitive reactionist on your side.

Israel commits warcrimes against civilians on a daily (maybe weekly or monthly) basis. A FACT you need to deal with.

It must be your precious beautiful dove you cant stand to see get dirty.

Shooting at civilians is precisely what many IDF soldiers do. It's probably not fun, its more likely in the stratum of a hate crime.

Thanks for playing... badly.

YouTube - Israeli T-shirts mock Gaza killings - 23 March 2009
Click to expand...

1.) The t-shirts are a matter of free speech.

2.) Israel does not commit war crimes. That is pure propaganda.
 
Vader said:
Nextra,

I consider it a racist term because its use by muslims is derogetory 99% percent of the time. The conotation for its use is negative and meant to be demeaning.

As such, I take it as an insult and a class label. It just stinks of insulting rhetoric. Maybe I am wrong but I find it insulting and demeaning.
Click to expand...
So a word is racist because it is used by people who use it with a negative connotation? If I start calling black people "spoons," does it become a racist term because I am using it to demean and using it with a negative connotation? :doh
 
EgoffTib said:
So a word is racist because it is used by people who use it with a negative connotation? If I start calling black people "spoons," does it become a racist term because I am using it to demean and using it with a negative connotation? :doh
Click to expand...

Oh dry up.

Your random attack on a word used to insult Israelis is lame and uncool.

Please do grow up.


The Arabs use that word in a fashion that is meant to be insulting. That makes it inappropriate and offensive.
 
Last edited:
Vader said:
Oh dry up.

Your random attack on a word used to insult Israelis is lame and uncool.

Please do grow up.


The Arabs use that word in a fashion that is meant to be insulting. That makes it inappropriate and offensive.
Click to expand...

It is meant to be an accurate description that describes Israeli political expansionism and it does so.

It is considered racist as an attempt to shut down debate and discussion. It is used extensively by Israelis and Jewish Americans themselves.
 
Moderator's Warning:
If you have an issue with a post, please REPORT it. Do not comment on moderation publicly.
 
creation said:
It is meant to be an accurate description that describes Israeli political expansionism and it does so.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
Zionism is the national movement for the establishment of a Jewish homeland.
Since the Jewish homeland was established like, over 61 years ago, today Zionism simply refers to being pro-Israeli.

Claiming that it refers to Israel's "political expansionism" is quite hilarious, seeing that Israel has given away over 33% of its lands from post-Six-Day-War in 1967, till today, something that one cannot associate with expansionism.
Calling it an expansionist is even more laughable than calling Venezuela a Democracy.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Moderator's Warning:
If you have an issue with a post, please REPORT it. Do not comment on moderation publicly.
Click to expand...
But...but....but CC, without the comprehension attack, TNE won't be able to debate anymore. :lol: j/k
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom