• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Census worker hanged, "FED" written on his chest

Bravo.

Heroic.

Not guilty.

Self defense.

Jury nullification.

Well, you get the idea.
 
Last edited:
Did it not happen aroung the same time as those protests? A lynching, Fed written across the chest, A federal worker....it doesn't look good.

Wow, are you, like, a detective or something? Cuz yer really smart...:lol:
 
Ah c'mon Gill. We're just speculating like everyone else. :2wave::spin:

Yes, you are speculating, speculating wildly and irrationally.

Uhhhh, two things happened at the same time, therefore they are related!!!

Ultimate logical failure...
 
Bravo? Heroic? How so? Are you against government workers?

Government worker is besides the point. The key thing is murder, not that he was a government worker.
 
Yes and he was tying his shoes and accidentlly tied a noose and it by mistake fell over this Federal workers neck and oops a accidental lynching.
Yes this can all be explained away so easily.

No, I think it is more logically explained by the fact that these individuals were so riled up by Glenn Beck and the Tea Parties that they decided to brutally murder a random government employee. That seems like the most likely explanation...:roll:
 
Government worker is besides the point. The key thing is murder, not that he was a government worker.

I know. I'm just trying to understand what his deal is. Is it a personal vendetta against government workers that makes it justifiable to him?
 
I know. I'm just trying to understand what his deal is. Is it a personal vendetta against government workers that makes it justifiable to him?

Libman is a radical decentralist.
 
Here are some things you can either ignore or not.

This was done on or around 9-11.

This person was a federal worker and the people the did this knew it.

He was lynched.

A political message was scrawed upon his body.
 
Libman is a radical decentralist.

:shock:

I'd say! Though, it's hard to tell how real people are when they are chatting on an internet discussion forum. It seems to me that a radical decentralist would have far better things to do than causing stirs on an internet forum. Then again, who knows?
 
Here are some things you can either ignore or not.

This was done on or around 9-11.

This person was a federal worker and the people the did this knew it.

He was lynched.

A political message was scrawed upon his body.

So what? That means nothing. And FED is too vague for you or anyone to really assess what it is or isn't referencing. There's absolutely no reason to bring partisan nonsense into this.
 
And that philosophy manages to justify murder?

I don't think he was implying that. I was only asking what his motivation was to say such a thing. It doesn't justify murder, but it helps to understand why he would say that.
 
:shock:

I'd say! Though, it's hard to tell how real people are when they are chatting on an internet discussion forum. It seems to me that a radical decentralist would have far better things to do than causing stirs on an internet forum. Then again, who knows?

Well, I would wager that Mr. Libman is not so radical that he's actually willing to fight the government straight up, but espousing radical views on an internet forum, that's something else entirely.

And that philosophy manages to justify murder?

It depends, I suppose, since murder is the unlawful killing of another person and Libman denies the legitimacy of the law, so...
 
Here are some things you can either ignore or not.

This was done on or around 9-11.

This person was a federal worker and the people the did this knew it.

He was lynched.

A political message was scrawed upon his body.

We already heard your stupid theory and we all reject it.

Simply because two things occur contemporaneously does not mean they are necessarily related to one another. This is a basic logical concept that is taught to college students in their freshman year...:doh
 
We already heard your stupid theory and we all reject it.

Simply because two things occur contemporaneously does not mean they are necessarily related to one another. This is a basic logical concept that is taught to college students in their freshman year...:doh

Those things I mentioned are not theory...Read the OP.

Who's this WE?????:rofl
 
Those things I mentioned are not theory...Read the OP.

Who's this WE?????:rofl

No, your "theory" is how they connect. It's hogwash.
 
It depends, I suppose, since murder is the unlawful killing of another person and Libman denies the legitimacy of the law, so...

So he is just harmlessly delusional?
 
No, your "theory" is how they connect. It's hogwash.

Have I accused anybody? Have I discussed anything that is not FACTUAL?

The people that have been feeding these whackos and fueling their fire are going to run from this like it's the plauge.
 
Have I accused anybody? Have I discussed anything that is not FACTUAL?

Oh, please; you're just bringing this stuff for no reason at all, right? You can't possibly think anyone buys this.

Besides:

Did it not happen aroung the same time as those protests? A lynching, Fed written across the chest, A federal worker....it doesn't look good.

Not to mention the implication you make in this very post:

The people that have been feeding these whackos and fueling their fire are going to run from this like it's the plauge.
 
Don't waste your time, Harshaw. This one is hopeless.
 
Oh, please; you're just bringing this stuff for no reason at all, right? You can't possibly think anyone buys this.

Besides:



Not to mention the implication you make in this very post:

What implication? The FACT that those two events occured at appoximately the same time.
 
Back
Top Bottom