• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jimmy Carter: Wilson comments 'based on racism'

I think that moniker is best applied to those claiming the racism. Others state that there isn't enough evidence to say that this comment was motivated by racism.

I think it has to be equally applied to either side who claim absolute knowledge of his intent.......but taking all things into account....... I'd say ......Protect my bride paying HC industry owners & a good dose of racism would be my favorites for his motives.;)
 
That's because it's a true and correct defense.



Total bullsh1t. The above statement is enough to tell me that you haven't got the first clue what you are talking about and all the rest that will follow is a kneejerk, emotional tirade that I have no interest in indulging.

1) "Thats because it's a true and correct defense."

I'm not going to waste my time with you after this post. It is clear you are a wacky covert defender of institutional slavery.

Like I told you, you can sit there and defend a system which bogusly claimed it was defending its freedom, while so malevolently denying that same freedom to others.

If you think it is "true" and "correct" than there is nothing to further discuss.

Your sympathies are quite clear.
 
Oh look, jallman, a saviour has once again come to your rescue.

Maybe he can tell us all about how pious the Confederate flag is.

:roll:

Oh, joy . . . another one who takes a single statement and makes wild, completely unrelated and unsupported assumptions about the person who made it.

Sadly typical. What do they teach in schools these days about logic and reason?
 
1) "Thats because it's a true and correct defense."

I'm not going to waste my time with you after this post.

It's obvious you would never deign to waste your time with a legitimate conversation. I mean, why have a conversation when you can freely rant and rave and create the world according to your own moonbat image and never have to face the people laughing at your lunacy on the other side of the screen. :lol:
 
Never defended slavery. You are a liar.

For two posts now, you have defended the culture in which slavery was rooted as an institution, masking your feelings in some wacky "States Rights" defense.

You did defend slavery.

Absolutely disgusting.

How dare you.
 
Oh, joy . . . another one who takes a single statement and makes wild, completely unrelated and unsupported assumptions about the person who made it.

Sadly typical. What do they teach in schools these days about logic and reason?

Not worth the time.
 
How dare you.

How dare you run away from legitimate points in the debate.

If you cared about racism, it would stand to reason you care about these incidents of racism that actually have proof :

Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.

Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
 
For two posts now, you have defended the culture in which slavery was rooted as an institution, masking your feelings in some wacky "States Rights" defense.

You did defend slavery.

Absolutely disgusting.

How dare you.

You know what? If you don't like it, go to the mods and complain. :shrug:

And no, I did not defend slavery. You, sir, continue to lie. It's becoming apparent that it's all you know how to do.
 
LOL at it was about "States Rights!"

Where do these people come up with this stuff?

:rofl
 
How dare you run away from legitimate points in the debate.

If you cared about racism, it would stand to reason you care about these incidents of racism that actually have proof :

See post #368
 
Not worth the time.

You could take all the time left in the universe, and I'd still be right. You displayed very sloppy thinking. And that was "obvious."
 
It's becoming apparent that it's all you know how to do.

Tut Tut, we have ample EVIDENCE that he knows how to run away from racism claims that have evidence.

Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.

Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
 
I don't think he's a moron. He is a very bright fellow actually. But, he's one of those people who becomes more and more opinionated and extreme as he ages. And, he IS aging, he's now 85 years old, and is probably starting to slip.

Based on his Presidency and his recent statements, he truly is a moron; perhaps well-meaning is the word you would prescribe to this putz, but intelligence is a stretch in my opinion.
 
You know what? If you don't like it, go to the mods and complain. :shrug:

And no, I did not defend slavery. You, sir, continue to lie. It's becoming apparent that it's all you know how to do.

Why don't you tell us all again how it was about "States Rights"

Tell us all how it was about unfair "economic aggression."

Dig yourself further into a hole.

C'mon, stand up for Dixie, Jefferson Davis is watching.
 
See post #368

Why would anyone want to see last week's episode ?

Watch the new episode of "The Flight of The Limt" right now kids . . .

Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.

Thats where the racism claims WITH EVIDENCE are, and that is what I posted.
 
You could take all the time left in the universe, and I'd still be right. You displayed very sloppy thinking. And that was "obvious."

It's really funny watching the MO's of some people around here. He comes to this site, supposedly to debate politics but as soon as he is given a debate, it's "not worth his time" anymore.

Once, yeah. Twice, even, I could see it being legitimate. But that's his stock answer whenever he is met with something he doesn't like. He's not here to debate. He's here to troll.
 
You could take all the time left in the universe, and I'd still be right. You displayed very sloppy thinking. And that was "obvious."

Only on planet harshaw.
 
Who's lying?



Wilson is a major recipient of contributions from the health care industry.

In fact, over his entire congressional career, health professionals represent Wilson’s top industry contributors, donating a total of $244,196 to his campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics OpenSecrets.org database. He received another $86,150 from pharmaceutical companies, $73,050 from insurance companies and $68,000 from hospitals and nursing homes.

Among Wilson’s top contributors are the American Hospital Association, a lobby group that represents the interests of hospitals and health networks, and the American Medical Association, which represents physicians.
Raw Story Obama speech disrupter a health industry darling

In 2008, Barack Obama received $136,703 in political contributions from AIG, the most of any politician. [1]

How does that make you feel?

In 2008, Barack Obama received $997,095 in political contributions from Goldman Sachs, the most of any politician. [2]

How does that make you feel?

I could go on and on...

[1] - AIG: All Recipients | OpenSecrets

[2] - Goldman Sachs: All Recipients | OpenSecrets
 
It's really funny watching the MO's of some people around here. He comes to this site, supposedly to debate politics but as soon as he is given a debate, it's "not worth his time" anymore.

Once, yeah. Twice, even, I could see it being legitimate. But that's his stock answer whenever he is met with something he doesn't like. He's not here to debate. He's here to troll.

The irony is, one of the biggest knock-down dragouts I've ever had with YOU on this site is over this very issue, and that I, too, think it was about preserving slavery. But no, I make a single point about a dumb thing HE said, and he assumes that you and I must be in lock-step on this.

Kids these days. :roll:

(Of course, it's hardly limited just to kids. Just a saying!)
 
I But that's his stock answer whenever he is met with something he doesn't like.

I'm not going to waste my time with people who ask me biased and heavily loaded questions.

And I'm not going to waste my time with posters who think slavery as an institution was ok.
 
Why don't you tell us all again how it was about "States Rights"

Tell us all how it was about unfair "economic aggression."

Dig yourself further into a hole.

C'mon, stand up for Dixie, Jefferson Davis is watching.

You want to start with the protectionist tariffs (namely the Tariff of Abominations) and how the north was stifling trade of raw goods from the south while simultaneously forcing the purchase of higher priced manufactured goods from the north?

Or how about Lincoln's response to the first Secession being simply "What will become of my tariff?"

I mean, where do you want to start...I'll let you pick since you seem to be an authority on the issue. :lol:
 
I'm not going to waste my time with people who ask me biased and heavily loaded questions.

And I'm not going to waste my time with posters who think slavery as an institution was ok.

Good for you!

I must say I am enjoying the freedom from the usual childish attacks today...& yes....I got the memo.:lol:
 
I'm not going to waste my time with people who ask me biased and heavily loaded questions.

And I'm not going to waste my time with posters who think slavery as an institution was ok.

That's all bull**** lying on your part. You thought you were in safe territory attacking something you didn't have the first clue about and then you found you stepped in a mine field that you weren't capable of diffusing.

You lie about me defending slavery (something I have not done) and you lie about the whole "it's not worth my time" defense you are throwing up. You failed epically and now you are gonna bitch out by running and hiding from the topic you approached.

I think we're done with you. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom