• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

REO SpeedDealer said:
Wow...what a call! Of course you probably predicted that McCain would win the last election.
Click to expand...

Actually, you would be mistaken. I knew he was going to lose the day he was nominated. I won a hundred bucks off the deal, in fact.
 
Scorpion89 said:
Sorry you made a statement syaing this was the first time in US House history that this has happen and I'm telling you don't know your History
Click to expand...
You're wrong. This is the first time in history.

Scorpion89 said:
as for you calling me a Nazi I told you that I would keep calling you on this till you apoligizes so I'm still waiting for that
Click to expand...

Topic Title: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson
 
Scorpion89 said:
Well since I was the person who put up the original link to the Park Service comment I know what the link says as for the rest of the post partisain BS. The Park Service doesn't Lie so are you saying that Park Service Spokeperson Dan Bana is lieing come on simple ye sor no it's not that hard quit walking around the question if you have any Balls or Tits make a stand if not I suggest you runj along and drink your warm milk and head off to bed and let us Adults discuss Adult subjects.
Click to expand...

You shouldn't asl people for links if you won't provide one yourself. Also, there were a lot of people who went who had signs that were irrelevant to healthcare... Radical, racist signs featured at 9/12 march on DC — and one vindicating my birther-denier link Climate Progress
 
pro-bipartisan said:
You shouldn't asl people for links if you won't provide one yourself. Also, there were a lot of people who went who had signs that were irrelevant to healthcare... Radical, racist signs featured at 9/12 march on DC — and one vindicating my birther-denier link Climate Progress
Click to expand...

Maybe before you make a post you take the time and either go back thru this thread and read the post I put on the link or better yet go over tot he Thousand thread and go to page 13 and read it you will find the link their if you can't do that then I have nothing to do with you.
 
REO SpeedDealer said:
Well...let's see. Who should I believe?

The DC fire department?

Or you?
Click to expand...

You do understand that the DC firer Dept. is one of many source used by the Park Service along with CCTV, USAF,NSC/NSA Sat Images, Park Service Police all the info is gathered and then the Park Service give's there est.


So once again I ask are you on the Left Calling the Park Service Liers how ****ing hard is it for you to answer the question come on it either Yes or No.

Whats wrong don't have the Balls to make a statement typical Left Wing Bull****.
 
Scorpion89 said:
Maybe before you make a post you take the time and either go back thru this thread and read the post I put on the link or better yet go over tot he Thousand thread and go to page 13 and read it you will find the link their if you can't do that then I have nothing to do with you.
Click to expand...

I just wanted to make sure that was the only link you have because if so it doesn't prove anything. She is guessing, if you can provide a link saying how she got to that number then we can talk.

By the way, you are badly-informed if you think Wilson's 1st amendment right has been violated because the supreme court has ruled multiple times that people don't have unlimited free speech plus there's this thing called the body of the constitution that says the House can make its own rules. So tell me, how is something in the constitution unconstitutional?
 
Scorpion89 said:
Well since I was the person who put up the original link to the Park Service comment I know what the link says as for the rest of the post partisain BS. The Park Service doesn't Lie so are you saying that Park Service Spokeperson Dan Bana is lieing come on simple ye sor no it's not that hard quit walking around the question if you have any Balls or Tits make a stand if not I suggest you runj along and drink your warm milk and head off to bed and let us Adults discuss Adult subjects.
Click to expand...

Wow...you are indeed well on your way to becoming my favorite surrealist!

Seriously you do need to read back through my earlier post; hint....there's no such person as Dan Bana working for the Park Service.:shock:
 
Scorpion89 said:
You do understand that the DC firer Dept. is one of many source used by the Park Service along with CCTV, USAF,NSC/NSA Sat Images, Park Service Police all the info is gathered and then the Park Service give's there est.


So once again I ask are you on the Left Calling the Park Service Liers how ****ing hard is it for you to answer the question come on it either Yes or No.

Whats wrong don't have the Balls to make a statement typical Left Wing Bull****.
Click to expand...

"The DC Park Police stopped trying to estimate crowds years ago."

American Thinker Blog: First reports from AP and NY Times indicate 'thousands' at DC protest? (Updated with crowd estimate)

By the way, can you prove the park services use these sources?
 
pro-bipartisan said:
By the way, you are badly-informed if you think Wilson's 1st amendment right has been violated because the supreme court has ruled multiple times that people don't have unlimited free speech plus there's this thing called the body of the constitution that says the House can make its own rules. So tell me, how is something in the constitution unconstitutional?
Click to expand...

While I'm not trying to say that Wilson's 1st Amendment rights were violated here (they weren't), I would point out that the House can't just make whatever willy-nilly rules it wants regardless of anything.
 
Last edited:
REO SpeedDealer said:
So who do you believe?

The DC Fire Dept?

Or nancy boy Glenn Beck?
Click to expand...

I believe the photo I posted, which Voidwar quoted me as posting, above, and the point which went along with it.
 
REO SpeedDealer said:
Wow...you are indeed well on your way to becoming my favorite surrealist!

Seriously you do need to read back through my earlier post; hint....there's no such person as Dan Bana working for the Park Service.:shock:
Click to expand...

Hmm you sure about that don't forget were and who I work for before you make a post.
 
Harshaw said:
I believe the photo I posted, which Voidwar quoted me as posting, above, and the point which went along with it.
Click to expand...

Oh so you believe that you can estimate the size of a crowd just by looking at a photo.

Right.:mrgreen:
 
REO SpeedDealer said:
Oh so you believe that you can estimate the size of a crowd just by looking at a photo.

Right.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Did I give an estimate of a crowd size?

I did not.

Does the photo show a massive throng of people stretching from the Capitol all the way to 14th & E?

Yes, it does. That crowd would more than fill the Mall, and that's only the people who can be seen in the picture.

But, nothing can stop you from believing that it's just a tiny fringe if that's what you want to believe, so I'm not going to worry about it much. :roll:
 
pro-bipartisan said:
By the way, you are badly-informed if you think Wilson's 1st amendment right has been violated because the supreme court has ruled multiple times that people don't have unlimited free speech plus there's this thing called the body of the constitution that says the House can make its own rules. So tell me, how is something in the constitution unconstitutional?
Click to expand...

Far from it yes Article I Section 5 states that the House can pass there own rules but they can't pas laws that go against the US Constitution or Bill of Rights which the 1st Adm is. Also as I pointed out no where in Article II Section 3 does it state that no one can interupt the President while he is addressing a Joint Session of Congress you would think that are Founding Fathers would have included that while they were writting this section.

The Truth is that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were both in favor of free flow of speech between Congress and the President during the Presidents Speech hell up to the late 18th Century it was unusal for a memeber of Congress to ask the President a question during speechs to the Joint session of Congress.
 
Scorpion89 said:
Far from it yes Article I Section 5 states that the House can pass there own rules but they can't pas laws that go against the US Constitution or Bill of Rights which the 1st Adm is. Also as I pointed out no where in Article II Section 3 does it state that no one can interupt the President while he is addressing a Joint Session of Congress you would think that are Founding Fathers would have included that while they were writting this section.

The Truth is that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were both in favor of free flow of speech between Congress and the President during the Presidents Speech hell up to the late 18th Century it was unusal for a memeber of Congress to ask the President a question during speechs to the Joint session of Congress.
Click to expand...

You still haven't answered my question: how is something in the constitution unconstitutional?

Also, do you not know that the supreme court has ruled that tehre are limitations to our first amendment right?

By the way, the founding fathers probably didn't think someone would be so disrespectful as to do what Wilson did.
 
REO SpeedDealer said:
Oh so you believe that you can estimate the size of a crowd just by looking at a photo.

Right.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...


I don't know....Some of these guys claim the ability to read minds too!!
(like those who insist that Wilson was not motivated by racism to yell at the POTUS)

Maybe we are dealing with beings who posses.......SUPER POWERS here!!:eek:
 
Scorpion89 said:
I guess you don't know were and who i owrk for then right keep telling yourself that their is no Spokeperson named Dan Bana at the Park Service never mind the facts Buck Wheat.:doh
Click to expand...

Can you provide any proof of that person existing, I googled that name and no one came up...
 
Harshaw said:
Did I give an estimate of a crowd size?

I did not.

Does the photo show a massive throng of people stretching from the Capitol all the way to 14th & E?

Yes, it does. That crowd would more than fill the Mall, and that's only the people who can be seen in the picture.

But, nothing can stop you from believing that it's just a tiny fringe if that's what you want to believe, so I'm not going to worry about it much. :roll:
Click to expand...

Well obviously I'm not terribly worried about it either. In a country with a population of over 300 million, a measly turnout of 60-70 thousand malcontents is hardly notable.
 
REO SpeedDealer said:
Well obviously I'm not terribly worried about it either. In a country with a population of over 300 million, a measly turnout of 60-70 thousand malcontents is hardly notable.
Click to expand...

Unless they agree with you; then they're a force to be reckoned with. I know how it works.

Besides, though there's no consensus on the actual numbers, most agree that 60-70K is quite lowball. Not I think you're going to do anything other than cling to the lowest number out there . . .
 
pro-bipartisan said:
You still haven't answered my question: how is something in the constitution unconstitutional?

Also, do you not know that the supreme court has ruled that tehre are limitations to our first amendment right?

By the way, the founding fathers probably didn't think someone would be so disrespectful as to do what Wilson did.
Click to expand...

If you don't know the difference between what is and isn't Constitutional then I cxan;t help you. Articl I Section 5 States that the House can set there own rule in accords with the US Consatitution and Billof Rights. Which means they can't have a rule that stops any memeber of the House Excersissing his or hers 1st Adm Right which Rep. Wilson was doing. As I have stated Article II Section 3 ther is nothing in there stating that the President can't be interupted.

Oh as for are Founding father guess you don't kno wmuch about them then huh. John Adams, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton used to have shouting matchs with each other when Congress was in session. When John Adams was the Vice President Hamilton shout him down in a debate on the floor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom