Yup.... beyond a doubt, only 60,000 people... :lamo
I wouldn't be surprised to find out those photos have been photoshopped.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out those photos have been photoshopped.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out those photos have been photoshopped.
Like I said...."Party of the paranoid"
I wouldn't be surprised to find out those photos have been photoshopped.
What, are you making some kind of attempt to appear "moderate" and level-headed now?
is it better to be paranoid or delusional??
Edit : When the 'paranoia' is based off of historical precedences and reality, and the delusion is well... delusional...
I mean, for me at least, the paranoia is in a sense of 'if we don't confront the evil it will kill EVERYONE (well... most sources I would give call for the death of at least 50% of the earths population... the more common is 75-90% human extinction, and a few extreme sources just say that humanity is a parasite that must be completely eliminated, but I digress), and not some sort of 'they are out to get ME!' I've not done anything important enough to warrant that kind of attention.
Doesn't change that those few that control the system, in their writings, claim to simply have no more use for the majority of humanity and call US... both of us... USELESS FEEDERS!! Ok... so, unless you are SERIOUSLY in control (which I doubt anyone 'important' actually uses this site) then you stand to gain from actually looking at the information that the 'paranoid' are talking about... then go out and LEGITIMATELY try to debunk them... and NOT through the use of the 'talking heads' at most news outlets (few exceptional newscasters), and SERIOUSLY look at the information on an equal merit and you'll find yourself becoming quite 'paranoid' as well when you see what is REALLY going on.
Cheers.
Well, if you look at the polls, you will find that every demographic and political leaning in America is losing faith in Obama and his policies, so it would make perfect sense to say that the protesters were not just conservatives and republicans... But hey, common sense has no business in political debate... right?
Is that code for "no liberals, so no legitimacy"?
The crowd attendance numbered at 2 million in DC, actuallly.
Um...
You lie!
Umm your wrong there Hazlnut as I have stated the NPS has stated this was the largest March in DC History so are you calling the NPS Liers.
^One word.....classic!
Umm your wrong there Hazlnut as I have stated the NPS has stated this was the largest March in DC History so are you calling the NPS Liers.
When the National Park Service produced an official estimate that 460,000 had turned out for the so-called "Million Man March" in 1995, organizers threatened to file a lawsuit. After that, Congress prohibited the Park Service from making official estimates.
From my favorite source: How Many Protesters? | FactCheck.org
maybe 60-70 thousand in the area around the stage...
A serious estimate would be in the MINIMUM 300k, likely around 500k, and a max of around 800k.
In spite of the name, factcheck isn't the most reliable source... better then say wikkipedia, but it still has a bias.
That is close to my personal guess, which is 500 to 750k.
What do you base your claim of bias at factcheck on, and are you suggesting they are in error in saying the NPS is prohibited from making official estimates?
A serious estimate would be in the MINIMUM 300k, likely around 500k, and a max of around 800k.
Lol....based on what?
Honestly; you guys need to get a grip.