• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Filmmaker Demands Apology From ACORN for Claiming Undercover Video 'Doctored'

So you have no respect for the First Amendment (people exercising their freedom of expression by donating to an organization of their choice)?

WOW! You also receive a failing grade. Please, take civics 101 over again as you have failed to grasp the basic concepts which were imparted to you.

ACRON receives tax-payer money...REPEAT...ACORN receives tax-payer money. Are you able to grasp this immensely challenging concept or should I simplify it even more so, so that even an O-bot can understand?
 
Well it's good to see that you support taxation funded child prostitution rings. Good on you.

missed the part where i expressed support for publicly funded child prostitution rings
point that stated support out or recant the lies you have cast at me
 
Last edited:
WOW! You also receive a failing grade. Please, take civics 101 over again as you have failed to grasp the basic concepts which were imparted to you.

ACRON receives tax-payer money...REPEAT...ACORN receives tax-payer money. Are you able to grasp this immensely challenging concept or should I simplify it even more so, so that even an O-bot can understand?

Wow! You must not have read the entire thread, or you would have known that I was responding to another poster who had said, "it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN."

Although the poster did not specifically say that he was referring to tax dollars, others have assured me that he was, along with a generous helping of insults.

I was not.

Now, is it possible for you to have a reasoned discussion of the matter?
 
Wow! You must not have read the entire thread, or you would have known that I was responding to another poster who had said, "it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN."

Maybe you shouldn't have tried to nitpick his point with technicalities.

As I stated earlier, it was obvious to me from the context of the thread that your previous opponent meant tax dollars. Had you been genuine rather than nitpicky, the entire discussion would have gone better.
 
Maybe you shouldn't have tried to nitpick his point with technicalities.

As I stated earlier, it was obvious to me from the context of the thread that your previous opponent meant tax dollars. Had you been genuine rather than nitpicky, the entire discussion would have gone better.

Why don't you take your own advice?
 
Back
Top Bottom