• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ridge backpedals on pressure to raise terror alert level

Harshaw said:
But, this is all a distraction, as usual; the debate isn't going your way, so you're trying to make it about me, personally. Been down this road with you many, many times.
Click to expand...

As far as your above characterization........I'll stand pat on how my end of this debate is going.;)
 
Grim17 said:
Again, you are forgetting one critical thing... Ridge never accused the Administration in the first place. There was no backpeddling, because he never accused them in the first place.

Facts can really be a bitch.

.
Click to expand...

Yes, they can. Fact is, Ridge signed off on the book cover.
 
Devil505 said:
OK...Pretty weak admissions
Click to expand...

:roll:

I had no doubt that you would say so.


So...since you are evidently capable of admitting error, I'm aty a loss to understand your refusal to do so here??
Click to expand...

Because I haven't made one. :2wave: It's you who misread me. Which is, as I've said dozens of times, not my problem.
 
Harshaw said:
: Which is, as I've said dozens of times, not my problem.
Click to expand...

Dozens of time??....Dozens...really???

If you said it once it may have been true........ but dozens of times?? Have links to you saying that dozens of times??

(let's see....a dozen would be 12 so dozens would be at least 24 times...Have at least 24 links?...or was that a lie?)
 
Last edited:
Devil505 said:
Dozens of time??....Dozens...really???

If you said it once it may have been true........ but dozens of times?? Have links to you saying that dozens of times??
Click to expand...

OMG. You're seriously going to hang your hat on that? Really?

Wow. You just keep "standing pat" there.

In the meantime, every thing I said about Ridge (everything I actually said, not your fantasy of what I said), still holds.
 
Harshaw said:
OMG. You're seriously going to hang your hat on that? Really?
Click to expand...

So...you admit you lied to improve your point?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op3zA9XaUKQ"]YouTube - Escena - Testigo de cargo (1958)[/ame]

I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here & trying to understand your refusal to admit you were wrong in your obvious belief that what Ridge suspected was a big deal. if true.....But now....You admit to intentionally lying, just to improve your debate standing???
 
Last edited:
Devil505 said:
So...you admit you lied to improve your point?

YouTube - Escena - Testigo de cargo (1958)
Click to expand...

:doh

No, slugger. I simply find it far too stupidly inconsequential to bother verifying for you. But if you think it's a big deal, then it only shows how desperate and insanely pedantic you are. Seriously -- was it literally "dozens"? It certainly seems like a good ballpark figure to my recollection. But if it wasn't . . . who the bloody hell cares? You? How sad is that?

And my points about Ridge STILL hold, no matter how much you STILL wish to make this about me.
 
Harshaw said:
:doh

No, slugger. I simply find it far too stupidly inconsequential to bother verifying for you. But if you think it's a big deal, then it only shows how desperate and insanely pedantic you are. Seriously -- was it literally "dozens"? It certainly seems like a good ballpark figure to my recollection. But if it wasn't . . . who the bloody hell cares? You? How sad is that?

And my points about Ridge STILL hold, no matter how much you STILL wish to make this about me.
Click to expand...

I added an edit to my above post which you haven't had time to see yet....SLUGGER

BTW.....Lying discloses a weak character trying to hide his weakness with deception. Why would you waste such an important thing as a lie for so little benefit?? (I perceive it as a character flaw)
 
Last edited:
Devil505 said:
I added an edit to my above post which you haven't had time to see yet....SLUGGER
Click to expand...

The same accusation will get the same answer every single time. You misread me, and it's your failing.

From here on out, as I do not wish to repeat myself yet again, the shorthand for this will be "blue bunnies." As in, you will continue to demand the same thing from me, and I will reply "blue bunnies." Every time I do, refer back to this post.
 
Harshaw said:
And my points about Ridge STILL hold, no matter how much you STILL wish to make this about me.
Click to expand...


No....As that old (great) film clip shows........someone given to lying can't be trusted to ever tell the truth....That is my obvious point.;) (I hope you had the opportunity to watch it)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom