• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oops! Charlie forgot this $1m house

This thread will get buried and forgotten.

But, whats new, a dem cheating on his taxes while at the same time wanting to raise ours.:(
 
Any other sources? The source you posted is spamming me with pop-ups and is crashing my browser.
 
jujuman13 said:
Link
OOPS! CHARLIE FORGOT THIS $1M HOUSE - New York Post

ROFLMBO obviously nothing will be done to this character by either the IRS or (sic) the Ethics Committee of the Senate.
Click to expand...

Dude needs to either go to jail or pay his back taxes with penalties in a timely manner if this is true. Second, though, the Dems have passed THE largest tax breaks in history to the middle class. Sorry, but your assumption that they have raised taxes is a talking point based in fantasy. When tax time comes this next year, you will pay out less than you did before.
 
formerroadie said:
Dude needs to either go to jail or pay his back taxes with penalties in a timely manner if this is true. Second, though, the Dems have passed THE largest tax breaks in history to the middle class.
Click to expand...

They most certainly have not.
 
From the link.

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Charles Rangel failed to report as much as $1.3 million in outside income -- including up to $1 million for a Harlem building sale -- on financial-disclosure forms he filed between 2002 and 2006, according to newly amended records.
Click to expand...
 
Rangel is such a ****ing scumbag. I can't wait until this asshole gets indicted/resigns.
 
Don't Tase Me Bro said:
They most certainly have not.
Click to expand...

Come come, now. Anyone too poor to pay taxes is considered to be middle class in the eyes of a liberal, I-I mean, in the eyes of a "intellectual". :roll: In that case, he would be absolutely right.
 
While I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt for relatively small amounts dependent upon the classification or complicated transactions, this is pretty ridiculous:

One of those deals he did include as a transaction on his original disclosure was the sale of the brownstone on West 132nd Street.

But in the same report, Rangel failed to include proceeds from that sale as outside income.
Click to expand...

How do you include the transaction yet not include in it income?

Normally, I'm thinking evasion, but with that in mind, it's just downright stupidity.
 
obvious Child said:
While I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt for relatively small amounts dependent upon the classification or complicated transactions, this is pretty ridiculous:



How do you include the transaction yet not include in it income?

Normally, I'm thinking evasion, but with that in mind, it's just downright stupidity.
Click to expand...

This is awesome. I'm literally giddy at the thought of this guy going to jail after the **** he's gotten away with.
 
RightinNYC said:
This is awesome. I'm literally giddy at the thought of this guy going to jail after the **** he's gotten away with.
Click to expand...

If you're stupid enough to put the transaction down in your disclosures but not in your other income, you deserve to go to jail. In the real world, you hide it entirely, or disclose it entirely, or disclose enough so that the IRS doesn't get suspicious. What kind of moron discloses it and then doesn't put it on income? And house sales are public record on most state website's so hiding that is exceptionally difficult.
 
Almost always when I forget to report a million or so property it's because I haven't used it in a long time. You forget!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom