• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rep. Jenkins: GOP looking for "great white hope"

Well, you would be wrong because, according to the majority of posters in this thread, code language does not exist in politics.

:rolleyes:

No, the majority of posters in this thread are saying just because YOU try to state as fact that people using Communist/Socialist/Facist are using "code language" to call him a nigger doesn't make it TRUE or CORRECT and no one here gives a crap about your opinion or judgement call because you've shown us nothing that would make us even CARE about your judgement or opinion or to believe it is correct.

This is not the same as not believing that "Code language" can exist. Disagreeing with your idiotic, poorly put together, "judgement" does not mean one doesn't believe that such a circumstance can not happen.
 
No, the majority of posters in this thread are saying just because YOU try to state as fact that people using Communist/Socialist/Facist are using "code language" to call him a nigger doesn't make it TRUE or CORRECT and no one here gives a crap about your opinion or judgement call because you've shown us nothing that would make us even CARE about your judgement or opinion or to believe it is correct.

This is not the same as not believing that "Code language" can exist. Disagreeing with your idiotic, poorly put together, "judgement" does not mean one doesn't believe that such a circumstance can not happen.

I would actually have been interested to read some supporting evidence about these codes, but in lieu of evidence, I categorically reject Limt's opinion as credible.
 
No, the majority of posters in this thread are saying just because YOU try to state as fact that people using Communist/Socialist/Facist are using "code language" to call him a nigger doesn't make it TRUE or CORRECT and no one here gives a crap about your opinion or judgement call because you've shown us nothing that would make us even CARE about your judgement or opinion or to believe it is correct.

This is not the same as not believing that "Code language" can exist. Disagreeing with your idiotic, poorly put together, "judgement" does not mean one doesn't believe that such a circumstance can not happen.
The whole bogus association of "socialism" and "nigger" never crossed my mind until it started showing up in the news. Where do they get these crazy notions?
 
No, the majority of posters in this thread are saying just because YOU try to state as fact that people using

Of course I never said it was a "fact."

I said it was judgement call.

And you are very wrong on your point about what posters in this thread 'really think.' Most posters in this thread (see post #277) simply do not believe code language exists in political dialouge. It is quite the ridiculous stance, but a real one nonetheless.

I have made my view abundantly clear that my claim is a subjective viewpoint.

Do not try to misrepresent my claim by falsely stating I said something I did not say, ie that I stated my claim as 'empirical fact.'

I can only conclude, regrettably, that you're purposefully lying to enhance your objections since I have made myself beyond clear that it is not a fact, but a personal judgement.

Fibbing does not suit you.

Try another more honest approach.
 
Last edited:
I would actually have been interested to read some supporting evidence about these codes, but in lieu of evidence, I categorically reject Limt's opinion as credible.

You still need evidence to determine code language exists in political discourse?

You have got to be kidding me.
 
You still need evidence to determine code language exists in political discourse?

You have got to be kidding me.

We'd all like some evidence of your specific charge of coded language. Otherwise your "judgment call" is just crap. Speculation and nothing more based on preconceived notions of your own.
 
We'd all like some evidence of your specific charge of coded language. Otherwise your "judgment call" is just crap. Speculation and nothing more based on preconceived notions of your own.

It is not "speculation."

It is not a "preconceived notion."

Code language absolutely exists in political discourse.

Requesting proof that such language exists in politics is akin to asking for proof the sun exists.

Keep on proving me right by repeatedly asking for substantiation of the obvious.

I'm sure the others will come to your rescue.
 
It is not "speculation."

It is not a "preconceived notion."

Code language absolutely exists in political discourse.

Requesting proof that such language exists in politics is akin to asking for proof the sun exists.

Keep on proving me right by repeatedly asking for substantiation of the obvious.

I'm sure the others will come to your rescue.

No.

People aren't saying its subjective to say that code language exists and asking you to prove that.

People are saying they don't care about YOUR subjective view that the socialist/fascist/communist statements are code language for nigger. They want you to substantiate YOUR subjective opinion, or stop expecting people to actually care what the hell your opinion is.
 
No.

People aren't saying its subjective to say that code language exists and asking you to prove that.

Wrong as usual Zyphilin.

They are denying its existence.

As for your personal jab "stop expecting people to care about what your opinion..." it is not interesting, not serious and far from the truth.

I have never expected anything from anyone, no matter how hard you wish it to be so.

Contrary to what you think, I do not control the number of responses I get in a thread.
 
Last edited:
No.

People are saying they don't care about YOUR subjective view t.

Now, I do not know about other posters, but this is not the case with you.

Funny, but you accussed me of stating it as "fact."

Originally Posted by Zyphlin
No, the majority of posters in this thread are saying just because YOU try to state as fact that people using

Thank you for finally amending your claim to reflect the truth of what I said: That it is a subjective viewpoint and a judgment call.
 
Wrong as usual Zyphilin.

They are denying its existence.

No. This is what we're denying :

When you hear crazy protester call Obama a Socialist/Communist/Facist = Code Language for the N word.

Bullsnot.

A lot of his opponents are calling him all three of those things.

A lot.


It does not ineterest me what laymen "think" he is or not.

It has nothing to do with whether it is accurate, or a wholesale misrepresentation.

You seem to think that a lot of Obama's opponents call him a communist/socialist/fascist because they won't say nigger out in public. You use purposely ambiguous language to, I would guess, give yourself some sort of mystical aura. Add to this the fact that you've gone on for over 70 posts refusing to clarify your position when asked to do so and it's quite clear that your opinion has zero basis on reality.
 
Who are 'they'?


Is it a daily exercise for you to keep on asking obvious questions, knowing full well you can review this thread and read the comments for yourself?

They're only a dozen or so mouseclicks away.

You have been told countless times.

I will not do your homework for you.
 
You use purposely ambiguous language,[/B] I would guess, give yourself some sort of mystical aura. Add to this the fact that you've gone on for over 70 posts refusing to clarify your position when asked to do so and it's quite clear that your opinion has zero basis on reality.

Ahhh, now I am guilty of employing "ambiguous language."

Well, sir this must be made very clear. I will not retreat, back down, or apologize for anything I said in this thread.

A lot of the crazy Obama opponents who use such names as socialist, commie, or fascist are indeed employing code language for the N word.

I see it in their tone and I feel it in their demeanour.

I will make that call whenever necessary. I do not ask for understanding, I do not ask persmission.

You can call me out. It is your right and apparently, your imperative.

You have been told many times what my position is.

I grow tired of reapeating myself.
 
Last edited:
Ahhh, now I am guilty of employing "ambiguous language."

Yes. Are you confused?

Well, sir this must be made very clear. I will not retreat, back down, or apologize for anything I said in this thread.

A lot of the crazy Obama opponents who use such names as socialist, commie, or fascist are indeed employing code language for the N word.

I see it in their tone and I feel it in their demeanour.

I will make that call whenever necessary. I do not ask for understanding, I do not ask persmission.

You can call me out. It is your right and apparently, your imperative.

You have been told many times what my position is.

I grow tired of reapeating myself.

As we've already explained how this forum works and the ramifications that voicing your opinion without any sort of explanation to why you have that opinion will have, then all we can do is say that you're nothing more then a race baiting e-Sharpton wannabe. It's just a judgment call though. ;)
 
As we've already explained how this forum works and the ramifications that voicing your opinion without any sort of explanation to why you have that opinion will have, then all we can do is say that you're nothing more then a race baiting e-Sharpton wannabe. It's just a judgment call though. ;)

It has been explained countless times. Whether you accept it or not, does not interest me, as you are not an interesting individual.

What you post, however, is of my particular curiosity this Friday afternoon.

What I can only guess is a warning about "ramifications" remains a fantastic breach of reality.

If there exists a partition, consequence or complication I have not exprienced it, for I have not felt intellectually threatened once in this thread.

Not a single time.

As for your Sharpton comment, it is not a weighty comment so it does not deserve a sober response.
 
Last edited:
And Obama's done near nothing to raise it.

Still in Iraq?
Secret prisons?
Torture?
Domestic Spying?
Rapid expansion of government?
Rapid expansion of debt?
More intrusive government?

Yup, all the things I didn't like about Bush, still around in a different packaging. Way to maintain the status quo Obama!

You forgot Afghanistan, Iran, Guantanamo, the deficit, national debt skyrocketing, and his desertion of Israel. Looks like all of the bad about Bush on steroids.
 
When you hear crazy protester call Obama a Socialist/Communist/Facist = Code Language for the N word.

Stupid is a code word for idiot.... stupid.
 
Wrong.

They call Obama a socialist with aboslute disgust in their tone.

They call him a fascist with absolute disgust in their tone.

They call him a communist with absolute disgust in their tone.

I'm still trying to figure out how the President can be all three political stripes at the same time, given that its impossible, but hey, thats ok.

What they really want to say is he is a (insert N word here)!

But they can't. So the crazies choose to call him a socialist, communist and fascist at the same time.

And it never occured to you that they might all be discussed with him? :doh
 
And it never occured to you that they might all be discussed with him? :doh

The fringe do not have an objective bone in their body. Their criticisms or "feelings" mean nothing.

They are out to further their own wacky, sometimes vehemently racist emotional agenda.

Like I have told every other poster in this thread, they belong in the same shelf as those bizarre, idiotic 9/11 "truthers."
 
I have nothing agaisnt Obama on a personal level other then he may not be all that honest but that is not limited to race. I feel pretty much all politians are dishonest.

What I do have a problem with is some of the things that has passed since he has been in office and some of the bills he is pushing for. To my knowledge legislation has no race so how am I racist?
 
I have nothing agaisnt Obama on a personal level other then he may not be all that honest but that is not limited to race. I feel pretty much all politians are dishonest.

What I do have a problem with is some of the things that has passed since he has been in office and some of the bills he is pushing for. To my knowledge legislation has no race so how am I racist?

You're not. He's full of ****.
 
What they really want to say is...

oh, so the guy who can't discuss with familiarity the role of WHIP and his relationship to a white house

who doesn't know durbin's particular proximity to the prez and how it tells

who can't relate the role of senate finance to waxman's energy commerce

and can't articulate the part played by rangel's ways and means in the crafting of 3200

who doesn't dig baucus or conrad, can't tell the two apart

doesn't even KNOW what elmendorf said, nor where, nor when

has no clue what feingold's status is, hardly knows what state he's from

has virtually no understanding of the geographical significance of american regionalisms in electoral context

in short, knows almost nothing about the nuts and bolts of AMERICAN politics

(maybe canada, i wouldn't know, wouldn't care)

doesn't understand the disposition of the bluedogs, how they got to where they are today from their history

does NOT appreciate the tenuous status of our freshmen

probably can't even NAME the SIX put in charge by the white house, the senate and leaders of both parties with the ENTIRE responsibility of crafting some kinda health care that might one day see day's light

etc, etc, etc

THIS is the guy who now presumes to read the minds of others?

LOLOLOL!

calls it a subjective viewpoint and not an empirical claim?

LOLOL!

thus, it's all HIS CALL?

well, i guess THAT it is

and GOOD for you, limit

hey, mr medium, can you tell me what MICHAEL JACKSON was thinking in HIS last hours?

pain pills?

song lyrics?

little boys?

LOLOLOL!
 
Back
Top Bottom